The Ultimate US Double Standards: Taliban and Other Countries

It takes no genius to realize the vile, sinister, and often costly double standards the USA, its propaganda outlets, and its EU minions and other proxies, this is one small example.

First of all, I'm no fan of the Taliban, they do not represent the true Islam, they drifted to the extreme versions of it under influence of extremists funded by the Saudis, the US allies and the largest buyers of US weapons by far.

The nomination raised the prospect that the Taliban — the violent, extremist Islamic movement that retook power last month as the American-backed government collapsed — would occupy an ambassador’s seat at the United Nations.
The New York Times

The Pentagon's propaganda outlet, aka the New York Times, seems to be worried about the ambassador to the United Nations of the former US-backed government in Afghanistan, the government that its own president fled the country with about 65 million dollars in cash as some reported and the government that is no longer in existence, not in any single ministry in the country.

This would have really been a moral issue for the USA except for the following reasons:

1. The Taliban is a US byproduct in Afghanistan.
2. The Taliban have been negotiating power take-over for months with the USA itself.
3. The Taliban not only came to power with the help of the USA, they were also armed by the USA when the latter left them all sorts of weapons and munition to play with.
4. The USA has done exactly what the Taliban is trying to do now in every country it toppled its legitimate government or still trying to topple its government, Gaddafi was still in the Libyan capital when the US paid millions to his ambassador to the United Nations to flip against him and declared him as the only representative of Libya, the same with Yemen, and tried to pull this with Syria and only managed to get it done in the Arab League where Al Qaeda representatives occupied Syria's seat for one summit and then no more.

For the Pentagon to be concerned, through its propaganda outlet, of the Taliban appointing an ambassador for themselves after taking full power in Afghanistan, this is beyond ridiculous, it's disgusting, to say the least.

After 20 years of unjustified illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan tainted with massacre after the other and the last was as the US was pulling out slaughtering 7 children and 3 innocent adults, the USA, its officials, and its media should never open their mouths about what is going on or will happen in Afghanistan, the only time they can say something is how much they regret the war crimes they committed in that country, and how much they are planning to pay the Afghani people in compensations? Other than that please USA STFU while your empire sees its final days.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

The Pentagon Apologizes for Slaughtering 7 Children and 3 Adults... AND?

Mistakes do happen, once, and when it does happen and causes damage of some sort some people get held accountable, punished if the damage is serious, what if that mistake resulted in a loss of life? Most certainly in countries that respect the law, any law, those committing the mistake will be tried and would definitely receive an extended punishment, if the mistake was not deliberate, of course.

What if the mistake resulted in the loss of 10 lives at once? That's mass murder, right? Now, what if the mistake was well planned ahead to the extent that an entire command chain is overlooking it and celebrating its success? What if the mistake took enough time to scramble a drone that would fly for a considerable time and chase a car and hit it directly with the commanders observing the situation are getting live feed?

Now that would cause some heads to roll, right? Some people should be held responsible especially those giving the orders and taking into consideration that they're experts in this field and have been doing such attacks for years if not decades.

Now, what if I tell you that when it was proven a 'mistake' all those involved all the way up to the highest officials were trying to cover it up and defending committing it instead of properly investigating and presenting the wrongdoers to justice, that is called covering up the traces of a crime.

Almost everything senior defense officials asserted in the hours, and then days, and then weeks after the Aug. 29 drone strike turned out to be false. The explosives the military claimed were loaded in the trunk of a white Toyota sedan struck by the drone’s Hellfire missile were probably water bottles, and a secondary explosion in the courtyard in a densely populated Kabul neighborhood where the attack took place was probably a propane or gas tank, officials said.
In short, the car posed no threat at all, investigators concluded.
~The New York Times.

Before arriving at the final conclusion, what if I told you that the US forces were acting in revenge mode, not in responsible one and wanting to avenge the killing of some of their troops and dozens of innocent people around their troops at an earlier time? People with power should never act in revenge, the world as we think we know it will end in no time.

How about the entire US invasion of Afghanistan and the slaughtering of thousands over thousands of Afghani innocent people, the US military had a tendency to target weddings, schools, and funeral processions, over 20 years, there are no mistakes there, and this is NOT a mistake.

And before I forget, just imagine the US or any of its allies has any information of such a heinous crime committed by any other country they're targeting for regime change, just imagine...

The next time US officials point any finger at anybody else accusing them of war crimes just simply spit at their ugly hypocrite cold evil faces.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

Will the Syrian Kurds Draw the Lesson before It's Too Late?

The USA is best known to let down its agents and proxies at the first chance it can, whether those are terrorist groups, drug cartels, political parties, or even entire regimes, the reasons might vary from a change of the administration in the USA after a new president elected to as little as the CIA officer in charge retired or moved to another department, that's fine, using others against their people and against humanity is the nature of the US regimes since inception and nothing can be changed about that now, but will those proxies ever learn from all the letdown US proxies? How can the US keep finding such proxies around the world?

I'm not sure I need to remind you of some of the examples of proxies the US regimes consumed and threw away as if they're even cheaper than used toilet papers, take Al Qaeda, ISIS, Manuel Noriega, Guiado, the former Egyptian President Mubarak, even Saddam Hussein, among an incredibly long list of individuals and groups, the stark example among all remains the Kurds, whether in Iran then in Turkey, in northern Iraq or now in northern Syria.

The question that arises when looking at the Kurdish - US relations and formerly the Kurdish - British relations: Do these people like to get used and later thrown under the train, repeatedly? Do they ever learn the lesson? People should learn from the first time, how come they're not learning from all these times they're seeing the USA letting down its proxies and worse: from all the lessons the Kurds themselves had with the USA letting them down and handing them on silver plates to their enemies?

Will they finally draw any lesson especially seeing their patrons letting down the Afghanis and prioritizing their dogs over the people who betrayed their country and served the invaders? Why don't they simply drop their aspiration to create another Israel within hostile countries on stolen land instead of simply living like all other citizens of these countries?

Husni Mahali, Turkish seasoned journalist brings up the history of the US and British betrayals to the Kurds and asks the question: After Withdrawing from Afghanistan and soon from Iraq, What Will the Syrian Kurds Do?

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

While MSM Focused on Afghanistan, NATO Terrorists Escalate their Attacks in Syria

Not sure whether the 'most inclusive and diverse' junta of Joseph Biden is trying to compensate for its humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan after 20 years of occupation and despite a prior agreement with the Taliban by increasing the level of terrorism against Syria, the jeweled prize in the US regime change wars around the world?

The western mainstream media (MSM) are laser-focused on Afghanistan and the Taliban swift take-over of the country within 3 days which all of NATO and stooges couldn't achieve in 20 years and ironically without firing a single bullet in contrast to using all sorts of weapons including the mother of all bombs first ever, paying a few thousand dollars compared to few trillions of dollars spent by NATO and stooges, and the weird PR campaign and molding of the Taliban to look like a 'Moderate Rebel' group that could be relied on to modernize Afghanistan which NATO and stooges did the opposite in the past 2 decades.

But why is that? Isn't there any other news to cover? In regards to wars and military interventions and bombing, terrorist attacks, and human rights violations? Of course there is, but that news is to be suppressed by the Pentagon propagandists because the war crimes are committed by NATO's own troops, allies, and proxies, start with Yemen, Palestine, Mali, Nigeria, and not end with Syria.

In Syria, taking advantage of the absence of the news coverage, Israel and the NATO-sponsored terrorists of Al Qaeda, the Kurdish SDF separatists, HTS, Nusra Front (aka Al Qaeda Levant), the rest of the Turkish-sponsored anti-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood groups escalated their bombing, attacks, and war crimes against the Syrian people.

Here are a few of those war crimes the Pentagon doesn't want you to know about in this short post (GRAPHIC CONTENTS included): Terrorist Attacks on the Rise against Syria; UN Remains Silent.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

The USA, Afghanistan, NATO, and the Taliban - Lies and More!

Let's not start with why the USA invaded Afghanistan in the first place, we all know it wasn't to fight terrorism, the USA created all these terrorist groups starting with the Mujahideen and not ending with ISIS, we were told that Obama killed Osama but that wasn't in Afghanistan, he said he killed him in Pakistan and buried him at sea as per whatever rituals they both follow, was it to spread democracy and freedoms? Surely not, the puppet Afghani regimes installed by the USA are globally renowned to be the most corrupt, there are few reasons though for the US invasion of Afghanistan like plundering its wealth, planing opium to finance its black ops, blocking China's connections westwards, threatening Russia from its Caucasian underbelly or what the US 'strategists' call it: Russia's Green Belt, referring to the Russian federal Islamic republics as green, and selling weapons, naturally, some mouths need to be fed in the USA, only some.

Let's start with what has the USA and its NATO allies and proxies achieved after all these years? All these people slaughtered, maimed, suffered, all this money wasted, all these instabilities started, all these radical terrorist breeding farms established, and whole generations lost?

We know that the Taliban did not fight their way through into the rest of Afghanistan which wasn't under their control, we do know that the USA and the Taliban held talks in Doha, Qatar and they announced that they have reached 'agreements', they won't let you know what are those agreements until after 30 years, or even 60 years like the case of the invasion of Iraq.

This self-explanatory collection of video clips in an attempt to try to wake those Sheeple who insist on putting their trust in NATO leaders, especially the leaders of the USA.

Keep in mind that the Taliban, as when it was established since we don't know their current policies, Al Qaeda, Nusra Front or Jabhat Nusra, Boko Haram, Abu Sayyaf, ISIS, the FSA, and all these terrorist groups had the CIA fingers all over them and inside them and up from their bottoms to their heads, literally, try to convince me otherwise.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

After Syria, Libya, and Azerbaijan, NATO Madman Erdogan Sending terrorists to Afghanistan

The Turkish madman and NATO's 2nd most powerful leader Erdogan vowed to fill in the void in Afghanistan of the other NATO troops after they complete their withdrawal, he kept 500 of the Turkish Army, still NATO, in Kabul to 'protect the city's airport', but those are not enough, from where will Erdogan bring the needed forces to keep a NATO grip on that impoverished country?

Erdogan Army of Al Qaeda Terrorists in Northern Syria

He did it before and he can do it again, so he thinks, Erdogan since and before the beginning of the US-led war on Syria turned his country, Turkey, into a major hub and transit base for radical terrorists who follow his anti-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood doctrine from all over the world to be gathered, trained, armed, and then sent to fight on behalf of NATO where member states of the not needed any more alliance do not want to send their own troops to kill and get killed.

The plan worked well for NATO in Libya, at first, then gathering the terrorists from Libya itself after NATO's major and easy success there to Syria where the terrorists were and are still being augmented on daily basis with more of their ilk, they proved to be very essential in committing genocide, massacres, war crimes, and all ugly things that are a little more difficult to trace back to NATO's headquarters, except when NATO officials themselves spill the beans or terrorists themselves confess, or get caught red-handed like confiscating the shipments of weapons en route to Syria, or the weapons failed to kill and remained with its serial numbers on it leading to its source.

Erdogan's, and NATO's bad luck in Syria was the steadfastness and unbelievable heroism by the Syrian people and their armed forces, and leadership to halt NATO's newest regime change and to reverse the domino, Erdogan's domestic issues grew in his face, whatever funding he's receiving from his sponsors is barely enough, and new battlefronts are opened including their previous Libya, so Erdogan shipped some of those terrorists back to Libya, then to Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, then to Azerbaijan, and God knows where else, and now since he got used to it, he's sending the terrorists to Afghanistan. NATO never leaves a country after they invade it, they either manage to install puppet regimes to serve their interests or return in different ways and shapes including militarily like the US in Iraq or France in Central Africa.

More in this report with additional links to sources of news mentioned above: Erdogan Sending Syrian Muslim Brotherhood Terrorists to Afghanistan - video report included.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

While Putin Opens Doors for Turkey, Erdogan Digs Holes for Russia

Russia and Turkey are not friends, their enmity goes way back in history just because the Turks have the most collective criminal history among all people, the real Turkey is about one-third of the current political one we know, the rest are conquered by the Ottomans.

They fought many wars most of which were won by Russia which was always alone in its struggle, Turkey, however, with the help of so many including some of the world's superpowers won some wars but lost the major ones. The Turks didn't forget that and with a lunatic like Erdogan in absolute power they are trying to revive the most hated Ottoman Empire, in all means and all costs, they do not understand the meaning of building normal relationships with other countries, this is a problem for its neighboring countries.

Husni Mahali wrote an eye-opening article describing how Erdogan's close advisors and inner circle draw their policies and what are their ambitions. Mr. Mahali is a career Turkish journalist and a former close friend of Erdogan until Erdogan turned Turkey into the launchpad for terrorism against Syria when he opposed the Turkish madman Erdogan's policy toward the neighboring country which opened all the doors of the world for Turkey when Europe blocked its doors, Erdogan jailed his former friend for some time..!

All of Erdogan's policies by himself and what his advisers are pushing him to carry out serve the USA and Israel on the account of everybody else including Turkey itself, Mr. Mahali conveys what the Turkish media are telling in addition to the plans of replacing NATO troops in Afghanistan with Turkish troops augmented by terrorists from Al Qaeda he will be shipping from Idlib in Syria. Very interesting information this article I translated from Arabic for its importance: A Witness from His Family Testifies: Erdogan is Putin’s and Russia’s Enemy.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

A Message to French President Macron from a European Muslim

Ahmed from Misto Foundation, a European German Muslim has this profounding short message to the French President Emmanuel Macghon and his hate speech against Islam in 'La France', just scratching the surface on the topic.

Advise to watch and share, then re-watch and let those words sink in:

Note: Ahmed did not mention that the terrorist who carried out the latest attack in France arrived one day earlier via Italy from Tunisia, one of the first countries that were 'Arab Sprung', the country that was the most secular country in Africa before 2010 and turned into a main exporter of terrorists after the NATO-sponsored Qatar-financed anti-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood cult took power there, hundreds of Tunisian young men were brainwashed, trained, armed, and smuggled into Syria, mainly from Turkey, a country which was also one of the strict secular countries in the region turned into a radical country under Erdogan, the global political leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Taliban Celebrates 9/11 in Its Own Way

I wonder when they say only injuries and not life threatening does that mean losing a limb, partial or total paralyzing, life-time psychiatric shock and other long lasting effects?


Sorry to say guys but those who occupy a foreign country deserve much more than this, your troops entered Afghanistan based on a lie, Your country created Taliban and Al Qaeda, supported, trained, financed and even equipped them, and it would be very naive to think that a caveman can send pilots into the USA to precisely attack 2 iconic buildings and to coincide with an evil plan to collapse a 3rd tower (no. 7) at the same time, and the coincidence becomes more outstanding when we know that the owner of the 3rd tower No. 7 is linked somehow to the strongest lobbying group in the United States with external links to a foreign country, an ally that keeps spying on USA, benefits from Billions of US Tax Payer's hard earned Dollars when they themselves need it more, the same country has a criminal gang that is specialized in dramatic mysterious crimes everywhere on Earth..!!


Anyways, the so called 'War on Terror' turned out to be 'The War for Terror' with the killings of millions of Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia (by an American designed Famine), Yemen, now Libya.. This only creates more enemies for your people, put on your hands more blood of innocent people, waste your earnings and deprive you from the welfare, healthcare and education you deserve.


Nobody appointed the USA as the world's Sheriff and nobody appreciate any of its meddling everywhere except one single state on this planet.. Guess which one; if you can't make a guess combine it with paragraph 2 above, in case if you still cannot make the guess I'll give you a hint: It's the only state on this planet that is based on religion (racism) instead of citizenship.. still no clue? Well, it's the only state on this planet that never honored a single UN resolution, ok.. since it's so difficult I'll give you the first letter: israel.. Guess now


The above appeared here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/war-zones/nearly-80-nato-troops-wounded-in-attack/2011/09/11/gIQA9mnxJK_allComments.html?ctab=all_&#comments