‘Syrian Civil War’: British Terrorists, US Troops, and Western Hostages!

Syrian Civil War, for more than 8.5 years the Western pundits paint the crisis in Syria as a civil war, really? See how it could be anything else except a civil war.

A Civil War is ‘a war between citizens of the same country.’ Google’s Dictionary says.

Wikipedia puts it like this: ‘A civil war, also known as an intrastate war in polemology, is a war between organized groups within the same state or country.’

Merriam Webster defines ‘Civil War’ as: “A war between opposing... Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/syrian-civil-war-british-terrorists-us-troops/

---

Sponsored Ad

Start with US$ 100 account and make more than US$ 1 each day, 

Click Here to Learn More

Sky News Team Illegally Embeds with Terrorists, Barks Criminal Lies about Syria

Flaunting International Law with the arrogant impunity of western colonialism, a Sky News team has illegally entered Syria, embedded itself with known terrorists, and now screeches war propaganda on behalf of al Qaeda and friends of child beheaders in the S.A.R.

There is an unwritten agreement among warmongering (NATO, military-industrial-complex conspirators) media that they share each other’s criminal lies as gospel, that they never ask even a rudimentary question.

Secure in this obscene pact, the Sky News operatives loudly screamed that they were “clearly identified as journalists,” and more disgustingly screeching about “International Law!”; they completely ignore the part in the Geneva/ICRC Treaties which describes the need of the “government of the State” in which they are located, to “attest to…status as a journalist.”

For the record, to Alex Crawford and her illicit cohorts: Nowhere in the 1949 treaty, nor in any of its amendments, does International Law bestow the rights of civilians onto journalists who illegally enter countries to embed with armed terrorist gangs. Also omitted from International Law is protection to ‘journalists’ involved with blowing up oil refineries, kidnapping women and children, engaging in femicide, slaughtering soldiers defending countries from invading pathogens.

Crawford and her gang of Brit illegals in the... Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/sky-news-team-illegally-embeds-terrorists-barks-criminal-lies-syria/

When a CNN Crew Blew Up an Oil Pipeline in Homs to Accuse the Syrian State

CNN, along with all other Western corporate media, is not a news reporting establishment as people are told, it can be described as a News Faking Establishment, better even call it: The Pentagon’s Propaganda Arm.

They’re not innocent of any blood drop shed during any of the US and its cronies adventures worldwide throughout their lifespan. CNN is relatively new comparing with corporations like the BBC, New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, and alike.

The following is part of longer report how a Syrian activist... Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/cnn-crew-blew-up-oil-pipeline-homs/

CNN Passive Threat to Dr. Bashar al-Assad about Regime Change in 2005

From an interview by CNN with Syrian President Dr. Bashar Al-Assad  in 2005 just ahead of a UN report on the assassination of Rafik Hariri talking about US's hard work for 'regime change' in Syria..!

CNN: There are some people, Sir, who say that you're the president, but maybe you're not fully in charge of those aspects, maybe you're "not in the loop", is that possible?

Assad: At the same time they say I'm a dictator, so they should to choose, you cannot be a dictator and not in control. If a dictator, you're in full control, and if you're not in control you cannot be a dictator. Actually, I'm not the first one and not the second one. I have my authority by the constitution, by the Syrian constitution, but at the same time it's not enough to have your authority, it's very important to make dialogue with the widest circle of people you can to take your decisions, and this is the way I work.

CNN: Mr. President, you know, the rhetoric of regime change is headed towards you from the United States. They are actively looking for a new Syrian leader.. They're granting visas and visits to Syrian opposition politicians. They're talking about isolating you diplomatically, and perhaps a coup d'etat, or your regime crumbling.. What you're thinking about that?

Assad: I feel very confident for one reason because I was made in Syria and I wasn't made in the United States, so I'm not worried. This is a Syrian decision and should be made by the Syrian people, nobody else in this world. So we don't discuss it in Syria.

CNN: What would happen, do you think, if there was an alternative to you? Who is the alternative to you?

Assad: Could be any Syrian, any national Syrian, and we have a lot. I'm not the only person who's eligible to be president, we have a lot of Syrians so we don't have any problem about that. But no Syrian will be allowed to be president if he's made anywhere outside our borders, this is a Syrian principle.

The difference between a home-made leader and an appointed puppet agent of the West.

2005 interview

WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception

I'm sorry if I missed some in the above banner, there are so many of them and don't have time nor space for all of them, but the above are the leading worst of the rest.

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed" Mark Twain.

Shock and Awe, your enemy won't have time to grasp their breaths, so does your citizens, keep moving them from a conflict to another and they will keep supporting you. The Shock and Awe doesn't only apply on your enemies as you see, it applies on your people, your allies, foes, and no thanks to the mainstream media propaganda which keeps you on your feet awaiting to hear achievements and victories without questioning the credibility or source of information you are fed 24/7 non-stop.

Let's guess who controls the mainstream media? Well, let's not guess, it's all over the net now. I invite you NOT to read this article (Controlling Most US Media), it's a bit outdated but nevertheless the info it contains has barely changed. 


Do you believe in Conspiracy Theory? Of course you don't, you are not stupid, this is only for the silly, naive and shallow people, you are much more sophisticated than such stuff and you don't want to look dumb among your friends, nobody believes the Conspiracy Theory because the world is only led by the good people and nobody ever plans anything, especially in Free Media (you won't click the link under Free Media because you don't believe in the silly Conspiracy Theory thing). But maybe you should spend 20 minutes reading what's in this article and comparing to your surroundings: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Now back to our story, when the Shock and Awe fails and the conflict takes more time, people will start thinking, they're not supposed to, but what to do, it's a human nature, and you have to deal with it, in this case the only solution lies with Mainstream Media, you control it, or those who control it are your allies, ask them to intensify their propaganda, each news bulletin should have at least a line or two in its headlines about your cause, analysts should be available to discuss your point of view, you can accept some criticism but make sure those criticizing you don't have the last words, bring someone to ridicule their replies and carry on, reports should be available, and if you don't have news: create some for God sake.. Your plans will fail if the public starts asking questions.

With the introduction of social media and then citizen journalists who needs to verify credibility, so many blogs I personally wrote about the use of these tools to carry out the media campaign to justify the cause of demonizing your enemy then justifying their killings. The audience when they keep flipping from one news outlet to another to find the same news of such: "dictator killing own people' and 'public uprisings brutally oppressed by tyrants' they'll have no other choice but to buy such stuff, nobody would care to search for the other side of the story, so many sides your friends in mainstream media are providing, and if you don't believe it there're plenty of Youtube videos to prove it, and it just happens that all these videos (over 64,000 in the case of Syria) are so much filling the pattern: shaky videos from mobile phones, breathless citizens running across the streets, so much blood everywhere, sounds of explosions, and if that's not available make it! 

Some examples in the Libyan case were the so many times Saif ulislam Gaddafi was arrested before he was actually arrested, and his brother Khamis was so many times killed before he was actually killed, or maybe not..! The anti-Gaddafi protests and rebels reaching Bab Alaziziya in Benghazi and Doha in Qatar that looks similar to the real one in Tripoli, Libya.. and so on. Al Jazeera's Fake Green Square. (for example)

Al Jazeera tried to do the same in Syria by building miniatures similar to known sites in different cities of the country and fake demonstrations near it, their infamous try was with the miniature of the Clock Tower in Homs which some real activists blew the attempt when comparing the real Clock Tower with the fake ones that kept appearing on this NATO mouthpiece.

And here is where the Shock and Awe failed, the prolonged conflict in Syria gave time to many to revise and compare news aired on mainstream media with the actual ones, and the same Al Jazeera in coordination with its sister channel Al Arabiya exposed themselves when they were given information that the Zero hour in Syria is imminent and simultaneously both channels started broadcasting on an early Friday news of tens of thousands of anti-Assad protesters fill two mains squares in Damascus city, the Abbasid and Ommayad squares, thinking by this they're giving the signal to NATO stooges to flood these two squares and at the same time to push those curious to go there to see for themselves then there will be ready planted 'activists' who will be filming any crowd, airing the same via satellite connections on those two pathetic channels who in turn will magnify the picture same like what they did with the initial Tahrir square (the article was manipulated later by Al Arabiya & the link image mentioned in it that shows stitching of several images to give impression of huge crowds, the image was removed for unknown reason), they failed because those plotting are not Syrians and not aware of so much of reality not starting with the laziness of Syrians on a Friday morning that nothing would move them other than bringing Foul or Fattah ingredients, no politics, no NATO and nothing else would cause a Syrian to gather anywhere on a Friday morning, then the main punch to their plot was the fact that the Syrian state tv's head quarters is in the centre of Ommayad Square itself, overseeing all 7 main roads branching from the square from a single angle, and that on Friday morning there's a live tv programme, and the fact that all Syrians know this pushed them to switch from Al Jazeera & Arabiya channels immediately to Syrian tv to see from the studio how that lie was exposed, furthermore, the presenters were notified of the fake news aired on those two pathetic channels, and the presenters would look over their shoulders onto the square to see how normal lazy Friday morning cars are moving that time, and the TV crews were immediately dispatched to the streets of both squares to interview people who ridiculed that step, a final punch to the two stations credibility.

What's left of the original image on the net, the original one was hundreds of times bigger than this

Another pathetic attempt was by the French France24 channel that cut a live cross talk show to announce the resignation of the Syrian Ambassador to France Ms. Lamia Shakkour because of the 'brutal oppression by president Assad's regime' as they put it, then to receive a fake phone from someone claiming to be Ms. Shakkour, just like a drama show, and at the end had to deny the story after receiving a harsh criticism by Ms. Shakkour in a press conference and the ambassador's threats to file a legal case against the channel. This pathetic attempt was meant to embarrass the ambassador and encourage, as they thought, other ambassadors to resign worldwide, such attempt didn't live more than 20 minutes (Al Jazeera channel insists on the resignation while the ambassador was on phone with Syrian state tv denouncing such news as cheap). And just for the record, this attempt was on June 8, 2011 and  till date there's not a single resignation of any Syrian ambassador worldwide, nor any diplomat to the level of 3rd secretary in a consulate!


Shocking propaganda isn't limited to cheap channels receiving such crap, digesting it and feeding the digested crap to their Sheeple audience, when there's no crap to broadcast they create it! It's difficult to believe because who would risk credibility for propaganda? Not when the prize is destroying Syria and not if they thought they can get away with it, and intelligence agencies informed them that the Syrian 'regime' would fall in few days so they went for the plot to the extent that a prominent US news channel actually plotted destroying oil pipelines in Homs in direct coordinating with terrorists to accuse the Syrian army of shelling them to punish the people. This channel, CNN, was defaced by the Syrian state tv and I discussed in an earlier post (CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier). 


A reporter for Al Jazeera using high-tech satellite devices spies on the Libyan Army communication in this report and brags about it, remember that Colonel Gaddafi was demonized a long while ago and therefore it's fine to spy on his forces by a 'Journalist' who shares the information with 'freedom fighters', then don't wonder why such reporters become targets in retaliations by regular forces tracing the spying devices: 

The role such mainstream media plays is vital for NATO, they're spies, they can reach places without suspicion, can smuggle communication devices to insurgents duped 'freedom fighters' and contributes to the military aggression. Their role is not only to demonize foes, but moved into an uglier phase of actually contributing to the military actions and sabotage.

You can understand the decision of Syrian government to expel foreign reporters from Syria at the beginning of riots in the country last year and then allowing selective reporters to enter, even those who entered based on pressure on the Syrian government by the UN and non-governmental organizations (other NATO tools), those reporters manipulated reports, interviews, and even when sending unbiased reports to their stations, the stations do not broadcast their reports, the same thing that happened with Al Arabiya reporter Hanna Houshan several times and was scolded by Syrian Foreign Minister Mr. Moallem on several occasions for the same. 

Yet, the most alarming interview distorted by a foreign prominent news channel was the one ABC News reporter Barbara Walters did with president Assad himself and doctored, edited, distorted the whole interview before was forced to air the original full unedited interview after the Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesperson showed them that they have a copy of the same interview in full..! (Check it here).


The BBC had its share in Syria's crisis and again put its credibility at risk just for the sake of promoting propaganda on Syria, despite willingly and fully knowing the level of deception it's involved in, but still takes accounts of terrorists and their lies at its shows with no shame and no responsibility and no respect to its own image and the sacrifices of many of its own reporters in shaping that image. In an earlier post I explained how the BBC Promoted a Terrorists to a Victim. 


The Guardian has proved to be a mouthpiece for the criminals, you can see interviews with convicted criminals on it criminalizing others, who usually are the subject of the demonizing policy, and if you as a reader try to point out the fact that the interviewed is a convicted criminal they delete your comment, ban you from further comments and sends you a nasty email reminding you with their Community Standards! This happened with me personally when I commented once on an interview with Ali Sadr Al Din Bayanoni, a convicted terrorist and head of an outlaw terrorists organization (as per the records of his native country), who named the sitting Syrian president Bashar Al Assad with all bad names he could dig from his vocabulary he learned from his gangs including calling the Syrian president a criminal and a thug and other bad words, they deleted my comment and reminded me that it's against their community standards to call a writer of their articles a criminal!!


Reuters reporter on Syria, a Jordanian citizen Mr. Oweis was arrested by Syrian authorities at the beginning of the riots in Syria for faking a report on the events and putting words in an injured soldier's mouth to show him as saying that he was shot by fellow officers for refusing to shoot at peaceful protesters when the injured soldier was shouting with the loudest faint voice he could that the shots he received were from the protesters side he's facing and not from his back. The reporter's bad luck was when a Syrian tv reporter was next close to him and recorded the incident on his own camera, and when all news houses taking reports from Reuters aired the doctored interview where the soldier's voice can't be heard clearly and only the reporter's voice is heard putting words in the soldier's mouth, the Syrian TV aired the film recorded by its own staff showing the Reuters reporter and the real dialogue that happened! ABC News of Australia learned a lesson after airing a Reuters report on Syria and here is what they had to say:

There's nothing called Free Media, whoever pays for the media house either by shareholders contribution or by advertisements controls to a very large extent the strategy of these media houses. Do you think social media is more credible as unbiased free speech supporters providing you with a platform to voice your opinion? Think again. At least with the Syrian issue where we see and been seeing Facebook deleting continuously a page dedicated for a real Free Speech supporting Syrian youth group calling themselves The Syrian Electronic Army over 150 times by now and as soon as the page appears back again, accusing them of showing disturbing images, while they keep another page called 'The Syrian Revolution Against Bashar Al Assad' which shows bodies slashed into pieces, beating by terrorists in army uniforms to accuse the Syrian army, and so on, this is not of course, in their scale, against their community standards. They once deleted a picture I posted of a US Army soldier bragging on top of a dead boy's body in Afghanistan claiming it 'violates Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities', again while they keep supporting the same page that is working to demonize the Syrian president:

Link to Facebook Wall Photo

The Weapons of Mass Deception have much more damaging effects than those of Mass Destruction, they destroy the brain in addition to animalizing the human or in better words: producing the Sheeple audience.

We Warned You

"Syria Scuttles"

Just a small post to give you a hint on how media consumes, digests and passes the crap to the audience in just 2 words.

Today, I was looking for news on Syria and suddenly I kept seeing the same words repeated in so many places: "Syria scuttles" and when I searched for these exact 2 words, this is what I found:

11,400 results in the past 24 hours for "Syria Scuttles"

Yes, that's typical for Google search engine, but shouldn't be typical for journalism, it's not NEWS, it's an interpretation of a news, the news should go as: "Syria demands written 'guarantee' from armed groups" and if you go by the official Syrian government narrative it goes: "Syria Agreed to Annan's Plan as it Respects its Sovereignty" then adds "Syrian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mr. Makdessi added that Annan's speeches at the UN Security Council were interpreted that Syria has pledged to withdraw troops from cities on April 10th, affirming that it is a wrong interpretation, especially that Annan has not offered written guarantees to the Syrian government that the armed groups agreed to stop violence, nor has he offered guarantees that Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey will commit to stop funding and arming terrorist groups." (Check the source here)

And here is how some news agencies have reported it: 

33,400 results for "Syria Demands" in the past 24 hours

That's only to show there's negativity on behalf of the Syrian government and not to show that the 'rebels ACTUALLY rejected to give guarantees' because they're NATO's angels on the ground, and that they would stay outlawed and they'll continue to fight government's police, security and army posts & personnel, take a look on how many search results returned for 'Rebels Rejected': 

143 results for "Syrian rebels reject" - note the titles of the articles

You shouldn't know that the rebels rejected, and in case someone had to highlight this news they'll not give it to you as it is, they have to play with the title to give you an impression that 'rebels' had to 'reject' to keep undermining the Syrian state's legitimacy.

Don't laugh while you take a look at the below image showing the positive news that Syrian government ACTUALLY agreed to Annan's plan and requested written guarantees, then concentrate on Huffington Post's title how it doesn't mention Syrian government agreement and includes it in the body of the article only: 

51 results in the past 24 hours for Syria Agreed (check the last one though: "Has Syria agreed..?"!!

Did you get it?

"They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, but because you're 'Foolable'"

We Warned YOU

If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed. Mark Twain

Journalism or What’s Left of It

3 different verifiable trusted sources, if you don't have them don't air the story; if you have to air the story with less than 3 different verifiable trusted sources just make sure you mention it in the disclaimer at the beginning and at the end. Sounds familiar? That was the old days of professional journalism, not any more.

A shaky mobile video with low camera resolution, some sound effects, and lots of movements, by a 'somebody', could be a 'citizen journalist', an 'eye witness', an 'activist', just 'anybody' as far as it serves the purpose; this is the replacement of journalism today.

Reliable and well established news houses would refer to the first option above to preserve their professionalism and their credibility, but the price sometimes is much more worth than credibility, if you don't add drama and action to your stories, people would shift to where they can find it, people want to see blood, atrocities, crimes, the highest watched are the most violence, some very few would still want to hear good news.

To add some spices to your news, bring on 'analysts' to discuss from their point of experience what's really happening to the audience who are too lazy to work their brains to analyse themselves and would prefer a fast meal of junk news, then ask to recruit some people of public desire like celebrities, clerics even fortune tellers so your story gets more attention and more talks, who cares whether it's true or not? People want action and fiction so just give them what they want.

First, I'll advise you to take a look at how journalism is supposed to be based on by reading the Society of Professional Journalists: Code of Ethics. Then when you are ready, come back here and check the following example.

The following is just one example out of tens of thousands that are polluting our environment with propaganda in a systematic way just to serve the same parties, those who ignite strife amongst 'rogue nations' citizens, then cry because of the bloodshed, then interfere to stop the bloodshed by shedding much more blood than would ever occur by its own, then crying again to get the rebuilding contracts. 

He tweets: "#Syria Statistics 383 Days: Killed:12,460 Children:882 Females:773 Soldiers:1,089 Missing:+65,000 Tortured to death:491 Arrested:+212,000" and he's literally nobody, but has 4,826 followers as of now, and this 'tweet' gets 50+ retweets (Twitter doesn't count beyond 50 retweets, this figure could be hundreds) then this is followed by another tweet: "The source of the Syrian casualty/ arrest stat is an independent Swedish journalist SyrienNyheter"

Then someone smarter would ask: "and what are his sources? i mean, is that independent journo in Sweden or Syria?"  

Reply: "He's done the count himself. He's been covering it since beginning."! 

And who is this super journalist that can count by himself: "12,460 killed out of which he was able to identify 882 children and 773 females (I assume adult females), 1,089 Soldiers (killed by who?), he also counted over +65,000 missing, 491 tortured to death and over 212,000 arrested"? Let's assume he did all this counting in 383 days, where is he doing the counting and who is this super independent Swedish journalist? 

http://twitter.com/#!/SyrienNyheter

He's anonymous, and if an independent Swedish journalist being an anonymous is not credible enough, from where is he sourcing his information and statistics? Don't guess much, he stated it on his own profile, it's from Bassam Al Baghdadi, an Iraqi writer living in Stockholm, Sweden and counting the Syrian casualties! 

If you find the above not stupid enough to base your news thus judgement on, take a look at the following image: 

It's a Top Tweet by a guy sitting in Kabul, Afghanistan!

A nobody sitting in his tent in Kabul, Afghanistan with let me assume, some NATO technology to stay connected from there, reporting news about Syria, basing his reports on an 'independent Swedish journalist' who happens to be another nobody sitting in Stockholm, Sweden who did the counting of casualties himself by sourcing his information from an Iraqi writer living in Stockholm, Sweden! There you have your 3 credible sources. Go ahead and shoot it at the public.

Wait, before you leave, you need to make it public attracting, and you need a celebrity. There's plenty of them, here's one: 

https://twitter.com/MiaFarrow/statuses/188063897553608704

I'm sure Mia Farrow is not involved out of her sudden love to the Syrian people, otherwise she would have done something to stop the unilateral sanctions imposed on the Syrian people by the same powers crying for the Syrian people.

There is killing in Syria, there is a crisis there, but the questions everybody should ask are: Who is doing the killing? Who are the victims? How can over 3,000 soldiers be killed and by who? Surely not by some chants of 'peaceful protesters'. Who did the many suicide bombings Al Qaeda style in Aleppo and Damascus? Who benefits from the killings in Syria? Should we accept that NATO destroys Syria like they did in Libya, devastate the country, kill tens of thousands of Syrians like they killed over 120,000 Libyans (Libya's population is 9.6 million or was living on over 1.75 million square kilometres comparing with 24 million Syrians living on 185,000 sq. kms) to come one year later and say: "No Evidence That Gaddafi Fired On His Own People"

Or like the Iraqi case still looking for those Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction that caused the deaths of over a 1 million Iraqi, displacement of 4 million internally and across the borders, and sending the country to pre-Stone age.

As I say always: They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, it's just because you are 'Foolable'. 

We Warned You

CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier

Camera conveniently in place for the first plane attack on Tower 1 (1 WTC), September 11 Attacks

CNN headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia receives a phone call at 4pm local time, the caller asks for Sean Murtagh, CNN's Vice President. The CNN official orders an urgent meeting of field reporters and 2 anchors. Half an hour later, technical teams were dispatched. Cameras in place, live transition vehicles sent to location and off shore to evaluate and install the best tools they had then. 

Two junior reporters were summoned to Murtagh's office where his aide asked them to guise as tourists with handy cams and get prepared for two events that will take place between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. next day in Lower Manhattan, New York, they were asked to focus on World Trade Towers higher floors and if they manage to get the right shots as it happens they'll have a very promising career.. One of them was Anderson Cooper.

Next day, at 8:46 a.m. a passenger jet crashed into World Trade Center's North Tower (1 WTC), and as predicted the higher floors were hit, Cooper and his colleague on the ground busy taking photos prior and aftermath. 10 minutes later, Cooper calls his colleague reminding her that they were asked to cover 2 events not one, so they get prepared for the second and at 9:03 a.m. that sad day, another passenger jet crashed into South Tower (2 WTC). Their mission is now to take some citizens testimonies on the ground and return to headquarters while their colleagues took control of everything else.

The events caused devastating damage to the site, a 3rd tower, Tower 7 (7 WTC) couldn't stand watching its two elder sisters fall in pieces so it decides to suicide and falls by itself. 2,977 people were the victims of the terrorist attacks. Nobody can estimate a real cost that resulted of this tragedy taking in consideration ensuing wars by George W Bush, the US president then to revenge, the collapse of the US Dollar note worldwide, losses in exchange houses, property damages, insurance... But CNN got a great boost to its business, the owner of Tower 7 (7 WTC) is more than happy that all his debt have vanished and is compensated by insurance, and two persons were promoted: Anderson Cooper and his colleague (don't have her details).

Devastation in the aftermath of  September 11 Terror Attacks

Man falling from tower

World Trade Towers on fire, September 11 Attacks

In every tragedy you will find people benefiting from the ugliness of it, these opportunists as they like to call themselves are not more than accomplices at their best if not the criminals themselves. Have they informed the authorities about the tip they received in that phone call, the entire catastrophe would've been avoided, and so many men, women and children would be among us now and living with their beloved ones. Damage to the entire world wouldn't have occurred, just for the benefit of the few greedy.


The above contains true information gathered from various sources and I added some drama fiction the western style after realizing the extent such a criminal organization like CNN would reach just to make a story, or maybe execute an order by some evil power. 


In Homs, Syria, on February 15, 2012 in an area called Sultanieh in the Baba Amro district, a terrorist attack took place. Terrorists blew up the oil pipes feeding the city of Homs and many other provinces with fuel for power generating plants, heating and factories in the country. The explosion was massive, huge columns of black smoke covered the entire city, there were no casualties in human lives, but the financial cost was enormous, not to mention the infrastructure, the people left without heating in the coldest winter Syria witnessed in the past 20 years, and those who didn't get bread on their tables due to electricity cut and bakeries not getting fuel. 


Surprisingly, a live transition camera was fixed in a location to cover the event that would happen 16 hours later and kept transmitting live for all that period, terrorists went to the site and back to the camera location to fix the angle for better coverage, the story makes headlines and here you see CNN covering from the scene live with a crew in place: reporter Arwa Damon from their Beirut bureau, Tim Crockett a former British Special Forces officer, now a security advisor for CNN in Beirut bureau, and Neil Hallsworth the cameraman. The same crew is seen in the camera location and in the attack location. The anchor is none else than Anderson Cooper.


We wouldn't believe such a story have we not seen a shocking report by the Syrian State TV that gathers all the pieces in one and confirms their complicity in the crime against humanity. At this point, if I was told that CNN knew about the September 11 terrorist attacks 16 hours earlier and prepared for their coverage to bank on their success in covering the tragedy of humanity, I won't be surprised. 


Watch how Syrian State TV uncovers the plot and presents with solid evidence how CNN and its reporters are accomplices in terrorist acts:

While the Good are rare, the Evil are abundant. 

What's Really Happening in Syria?

Questions we should ask ourselves regarding events in Syria in particular, and the MENA (Middle East & North Africa) in general to understand what's really happening:


1) Who are those appearing in foreign media as taking to the streets protesting against Syrian Govt?
2) Where are these protests taking place in Syria?
3) What are they calling for?
4) What are their means when protesting?
5) Who supports them?
6) Why they have an unchallenged priority in coverage above other could be more important news?


First we need to know that Syria is a very diversitified society that has a minority of every ethnic or religious sect known to the wider region, we should also keep in mind that the Syrians have seen most of the aggressors during history and managed to get their independence hence they became ulta-sensitive towards any foreign intervention in their internal matters, they'll simply regather, forget their differences and fight the foreign intervention.


Let's try to answer these questions.


1) Who are those appearing in foreign media as taking to the streets protesting against Syrian Govt? 
Daily so many news channels show footage of large numbers of crowds protesting in several cities in Syria against the govt, many of these news channels took on its shoulders to keep posting these protests all day, all week and rebroadcast it several times, and in many times keep the 'Live' symbol appearing to give an illusion that these are live endless protests. 


By the look at the protesters, most of them will not show faces, recording their protests from behind, or from a distance, but in case we believe that these protesters are Syrians and are actually in Syria, who are they?


Based on the narrations while broadcasting these protests it hints that it covers most of the Syrian territories making it appear like a mass popular movement. Obviously those participating in the protests are from poor and poorest areas based on their looks, cloth and neighborhoods. So these are poor people protesting, and not educated elite or organized political parties or unions.


2) Where are these protests taking place in Syria?
As in our above answer (1), we hinted that it meant to show that it covers all over Syria, but does it? For the past 5 months, ie after the famous Hama 900,000 protesters (number refuted by logic and many media analysts since the entire population doesn't exceed 2 million all over the province) we stopped seeing mass protests in known cities, or centers of provinces. The only reported protests are taking place in remote villages with names like: Kafr Nibl (كفر نبل), Ibtaa (ابطع), Bayyada (بياضة), Dael (داعل).. Now thanks to Google and their revolutionary product: Google Maps, I invite the readers to locate these protest hotbeds on the map.


As we see, remote villages, mostly near borders with other countries, with extremely low populations -not exceeding 5,000 in most cases- are seeing protests demanding the change of the regime!


In a 'Democracy' that's absurd, because they don't stand a chance in a country of 23 million population, in a 'Republic' their rights will be respected, their voices will not be heard. 


3) What are they calling for?
What are these 'protests' demanding? To take to the streets against an 'oppressing brutal regime' there should be grieve demands to allow undesirable consequences that pushes people to protest, so in this case their demands should be very much life touching to take the chance of losing life for?!


At the beginning of protests in March, when events in Syria started unfolding, people were asking for the replacement of the governor and a security chief in Daraa city to the south of Syria, near Jordanian borders. The governor was replaced, the security chief was replaced, but protests turned violent, the court house after replacing the governor was attacked, torched, public and security buildings attacked, rioters used sniper rifles and pump-actions to attack army & security posts in the city, demands increased and the ousting of the president started to be heard with the infamous slogan: "The People Demand the Downfall of the Regime" "الشعب يريد إسقاط النظام".. the same slogan used all over the 'Arab Spring' affected countries from Egypt to Tunisia to Libya to Yemen..


To demand the downfall of the 'regime' requires grave reasons and mass protests and not to start with small local issues and tiny protests accompanied with violent riots.


If we add over 9 million Syrians rallying in support of the president during the month November in the main cities of Syria, to add that many cities never witnessed a single protest, not even with a 100 person protesting, something is wrong about labeling it popular protests. We should know that Damascus, Aleppo, Latakia, Tartous, Al Rigga, Hasaka Suwaida, Qunaitra didn't witness any anti-govt protest, that's a huge indication justifying the doubtful reasons behind 'anti-govt protests'. Keep in mind that Damascus and Aleppo by themselves have about half of the population of the whole of Syria.


Yet, president Assad took brave and very substantial steps towards reforming the entire political system in Syria, starting with dismissing the previous government, forming a new one, forming committees that introduced new laws governing Media, Parties, Constitution, Elections, Local Administration.. etc. Most finished their work and the progress in others is admirable.


So what do these people really want, protesting in small numbers in remote cities, mostly close to the borders? Should their demands of the downfall of the entire 'regime' be taking seriously? Name a country that does so, and we'll look into their experience.


4) What are their means when protesting? 
A protest is known to be peaceful, but when weapons from kitchen knives to AK47 rifles and more, that is called violent riots and their participants could be referred to as armed gangs.


Placards calling for better politics/ life enhancing slogans can be found in a peaceful protest, placards calling for the hanging of the president of a country, is a provocative criminal call.


Marching in a number throughout a road in a city calling for demands can be called a peaceful protest, not mentioning the requirement of a license from authorities, while gathering in groups then attacking an army base, a public building, destroying properties, killing police officers cannot be seen as a 'peaceful protest', it should be called: A Terrorist Act, or in a softer note: An armed mafia attack.


5) Who supports them?
As we said earlier above, Syrians are ultra sensitive to foreigners meddling with their internal country matters, think of an enemy state supporting riots in Syria?!


Whatever the cause of protests can be understood, but when it comes to be supported by weapons, money and covered in media by enemy states, especially in Syria that's seen as a terrorist plot, conspiracy theories will come on mind, because it is not thought of a Syrian taking aide from an enemy state to topple his own regime for whatsoever reason, except under the perspective of a conspiracy plot to invade his country.


The United States of America is not considered a friendly country in Syria keeping in mind its decades long support of israel that occupies Syrian land among other Arab lands, and oppress Syrians among oppressing other Arabs in its apartheid policies. Thus any support by the USA to any group or individuals in Syria is looked upon with suspicion of spying to helping in invading. Syrians also saw what the USA has down for 8 years after invading Iraq to devastating the entire country, killing a million Iraqi and displacing over 4 millions, they also saw what happened when USA and friends in NATO protected Libyans by securing their way to heavens in a genocide. 


6) Why they have an unchallenged priority in coverage above other could be more important news? 
Syria is a very important geopolitical country, its stance against israel, thus imperialism, makes it the most important part of a chain of countries that still stands out of the USA hegemony. Destroying Syria is to USA as destroying Nazi Germany to the Allies during WWII.


Al Jazeera was chosen to be a mouthpiece for NATO backed 'revolutions' in the Arab World, dubbed the 'Arab Spring', for its built up credibility over 11 years, and its acceptance by most of the Arabs as a trustworthy news source, add to it the proclaimed role it had in anti-Mubarak of Egypt protests and others. The role of Al Jazeera was essential to continue the chain of countries split and visited by the 'Arab Spring'. Its role was defaced by Syrians and namely a private-owned satellite channel in Syria 'Addounia' that also was subject to an unprecedented sanction by the EU to block its satellite broadcasting on the European Satellites just because it was able to deface the Al Jazeera and show the warmongering and propaganda it was spreading in order to achieve the biggest goal, 'The New Middle East' by a "creative chaos" that will lead to the New World Order, eventually.


Foreign and other Arab based media started quoting Al Jazeera for news, which Al Jazeera was quoting vague unknown 'Activist' mostly based in Europe telling events and 'brutality' of the Syrian government and security forces 'oppressing' the 'peaceful protesters'. So much of credibility falls when you just follow the line of reporting. Some news houses had to apologize for misinformation and wrong reporting more than once, then they were forced to just follow the leader 'Al Jazeera' which also follows its leaders in the US Secretary of State Near East Office under the official Jefferey Feltman. Among those news houses complicit we can find: Reuters (and what it represents in the media world), CNN, FoxNews (of course), Washington Post, LA Times, NY Post and many others. Al Arabiya pan Arab news channel is just a smaller clone of Al Jazeera.


Same could be applied to tools used by the US Administration that it can have access to.


From all of the above, we come to the concluding question: Is what's happening in Syria peaceful protests against demanding better political contribution against a brutal regime? Or if we look down from an upper level, it is a plot to destroy and slice those countries not fully under the US hegemony and replace their existing governments with ones that are puppets used by the US administrations? 

I'll leave the answer to you.

Our Comments on A CNN Article Distracting The Real US Tax Payers Struggle Away from OWS into Syria

I really admire his (President Assad's) insistence to warn regional countries and international society despite their eagerness to just invade one country after another.. He's doing what he has to do so nobody will blame him in the future when 'very dire' repercussions occur.

And to those who still think it's a peaceful opposition protests against a regime using tanks against them, go visit Homs City, central of Syria where people are kidnapped on remote countryside roads just because of their sect, slaughtered with butcher knifes and sent in pieces to their families, then deny the existence of salafi groups, even secretary Clinton admitted they are well armed, well financed and just waiting to launch a civil war in entire of the country.

Libya scenario won't reoccur in Syria as far as warmongers wishful thinking takes them, civil war won't happen in Syria as Clinton's wishful thinking takes her, if it was to happen it would've happened 8 months ago when the 'peaceful protesters' started killing indiscriminately, the more killings happening there is only uniting the people behind their army that barely saw a crack out of 560,000 troops, 60,000 security members.. 

Stop playing stupid and open both eyes, saving israel's greed isn't worth all the blood spilled and all the money wasted, 1,200,000 families lost their houses in USA itself last year to banks, wake up, your struggle is with the soul of OWS and don't let them distract you by opening wars in far countries and feeding you with misleading Hollywood style media.

Our above comment appeared on a CNN.com article found here: http://edition.cnn.com/2011/11/20/world/meast/syria-violence/index.html