Showing posts sorted by relevance for query cnn knew 16 hours. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query cnn knew 16 hours. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, March 24, 2012

CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier

Camera conveniently in place for the first plane attack on Tower 1 (1 WTC), September 11 Attacks
Camera conveniently in place for the first plane attack on Tower 1 (1 WTC), September 11 Attacks

CNN headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia receives a phone call at 4pm local time, the caller asks for Sean Murtagh, CNN's Vice President. The CNN official orders an urgent meeting of field reporters and 2 anchors. Half an hour later, technical teams were dispatched. Cameras in place, live transition vehicles sent to location and off shore to evaluate and install the best tools they had then. 

Two junior reporters were summoned to Murtagh's office where his aide asked them to guise as tourists with handy cams and get prepared for two events that will take place between 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. next day in Lower Manhattan, New York, they were asked to focus on World Trade Towers higher floors and if they manage to get the right shots as it happens they'll have a very promising career.. One of them was Anderson Cooper.

Next day, at 8:46 a.m. a passenger jet crashed into World Trade Center's North Tower (1 WTC), and as predicted the higher floors were hit, Cooper and his colleague on the ground busy taking photos prior and aftermath. 10 minutes later, Cooper calls his colleague reminding her that they were asked to cover 2 events not one, so they get prepared for the second and at 9:03 a.m. that sad day, another passenger jet crashed into South Tower (2 WTC). Their mission is now to take some citizens testimonies on the ground and return to headquarters while their colleagues took control of everything else.



The events caused devastating damage to the site, a 3rd tower, Tower 7 (7 WTC) couldn't stand watching its two elder sisters fall in pieces so it decides to suicide and falls by itself. 2,977 people were the victims of the terrorist attacks. Nobody can estimate a real cost that resulted of this tragedy taking in consideration ensuing wars by George W Bush, the US president then to revenge, the collapse of the US Dollar note worldwide, losses in exchange houses, property damages, insurance... But CNN got a great boost to its business, the owner of Tower 7 (7 WTC) is more than happy that all his debt have vanished and is compensated by insurance, and two persons were promoted: Anderson Cooper and his colleague (don't have her details).
Devastation in the aftermath of  September 11 Terror Attacks

Man Falling off World Trade Center Tower September 11 Terror Attacks
Man falling from tower

September 11 Terror Attacks
World Trade Towers on fire, September 11 Attacks
In every tragedy you will find people benefiting from the ugliness of it, these opportunists as they like to call themselves are not more than accomplices at their best if not the criminals themselves. Have they informed the authorities about the tip they received in that phone call, the entire catastrophe would've been avoided, and so many men, women and children would be among us now and living with their beloved ones. Damage to the entire world wouldn't have occurred, just for the benefit of the few greedy.


The above contains true information gathered from various sources and I added some drama fiction the western style after realizing the extent such a criminal organization like CNN would reach just to make a story, or maybe execute an order by some evil power. 


In Homs, Syria, on February 15, 2012 in an area called Sultanieh in the Baba Amro district, a terrorist attack took place. Terrorists blew up the oil pipes feeding the city of Homs and many other provinces with fuel for power generating plants, heating and factories in the country. The explosion was massive, huge columns of black smoke covered the entire city, there were no casualties in human lives, but the financial cost was enormous, not to mention the infrastructure, the people left without heating in the coldest winter Syria witnessed in the past 20 years, and those who didn't get bread on their tables due to electricity cut and bakeries not getting fuel. 


Surprisingly, a live transition camera was fixed in a location to cover the event that would happen 16 hours later and kept transmitting live for all that period, terrorists went to the site and back to the camera location to fix the angle for better coverage, the story makes headlines and here you see CNN covering from the scene live with a crew in place: reporter Arwa Damon from their Beirut bureau, Tim Crockett a former British Special Forces officer, now a security advisor for CNN in Beirut bureau, and Neil Hallsworth the cameraman. The same crew is seen in the camera location and in the attack location. The anchor is none else than Anderson Cooper.


We wouldn't believe such a story have we not seen a shocking report by the Syrian State TV that gathers all the pieces in one and confirms their complicity in the crime against humanity. At this point, if I was told that CNN knew about the September 11 terrorist attacks 16 hours earlier and prepared for their coverage to bank on their success in covering the tragedy of humanity, I won't be surprised. 


Watch how Syrian State TV uncovers the plot and presents with solid evidence how CNN and its reporters are accomplices in terrorist acts:




While the Good are rare, the Evil are abundant. 

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Western Media Jump To Rescue Reuters Credibility

New York Times 'Blogs' have taken on their shoulders the mission to try to rescue whatever is left of Reuters credibility compromised by the incident yesterday, when the western News Agency, which is the source of all NATO aligned media, have posted at least 2 reports on its blog site, one of them an interview with the head of the Turkish (NATO members state) sponsored terrorist group the FSA, Free Syrian Army, or to justify their terrorism call them 'Freedom Fighters', this so called leader cries in the interview of being a victim to a ploy by the Qataris and Saudis, the FSA's main financiers and weapon suppliers, that they're leading his troops to their slaughter by the Syrian Army, and his declaration of withdrawing from the city of Aleppo after sustaining heavy losses, 1,000 FSA terrorists killed, over 1,500 arrested by the Syrian authorities, and his intention to further withdraw from all other cities. 

The second article exposes, maybe innocently the fact that the same FSA terrorists have acquired chemical weapons and gas masks in order to carry out a chemical or biological attack against civilians to blame it on the Syrian army as they've carried out earlier the infamous Houla and Tremseh massacres and were found later to be the culprits of these two horrible and heinous massacres, but only after the goal of blaming was achievable during the UNSC sessions held within hours of each of these 2 crimes against humanity..

As we rightly asked yesterday whether Reuters is a Credible News Agency?, it's amazing to see clients of this agency, namely NY Times in this case jump to rescue their doomed once leading news agency by all means even if they have to target other journalists carrying out their duty from inside Syria and on the ground, people whom actually received death threats from FSA terrorists for exposing their fake achievements and the reality of this terrorist organization, unlike say Reuters reporter Mr. Khaled Oweis, comfortably stationed in Amman, Jordan and basing most of his reports on again another comfortably stationed one man show kiosk in London, UK the SOHR, or Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, or on 'activists' without any shred of credibility or even proper names.

Just yesterday a group under the wings of the terrorist FSA organization declared they executed a prominent Syrian TV presenter after kidnapping him on July 21st near his house in Damascus countryside in what was known then to be the Zero Hour where all Syrian based media would be cut off air and then frequencies hijacked in order to air news of the falling of the Syrian state in the hands of the NATO backed rebels, they had to kidnap Mr. Mahmoud Saeed as a well known figure among Syrians to give credibility to their story among the simple masses of the Syrians by forcing him to read such statements, he paid his life as per their confession yesterday for not accepting the pressure, he was under torture as obvious in this picture they posted of him:


And like this hit order where they place a picture of a target and all they need to do is label him 'an informant' or a 'Shabeeh', and all his crime would be a 'Public Employee' refusing to join their 'peaceful revolution':


Then he gets killed later and they'll brag about his killing just like they were wishing for his death, as we've seen in so many cases so far.

It's not a surprise that all NATO aligned media in the west and their stooges elsewhere would jump to help one another to further a goal set to be achieved, but it's becoming very lame just as described below in reaction to the NY Times Blog attempting to rescue Reuters credibility:

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/03/reading-the-fake-reuters-reports-on-syria/
So who to believe now? The 'imposer' or Reuters denying reports written hastily maybe not by the same gentlemen's names but could be one of those hundreds of 'activists' and just didn't have time to edit it properly, using the names of such prominent journos to give credibility, and the fact they're not working with Reuters now gives the agency an additional base to fool people, like the author of this same article maybe on NY Times Blogs, that see: it's not us, our servers were hacked?! 

Well, if it was actually Reuters posting these news then withdrawing them for whatever reason, maybe some embassies interference as the case by so many agencies, that's very harming to Reuters credibility, especially that even Media Watch from ABC News Australia has harshly criticized the unprofessional coverage of Reuters of events in Syria, there's a youtube video for that, just google it, or if its servers were really hacked, that adds stupidity to their failing credibility...!

I personally wouldn't be surprised to see any western news agencies including this very same NY Times faking any piece of news, or manipulating one to serve NATO's goal anywhere, remember how Barbara Walters distorted, edited, and manipulated the interview with Syrian president Assad on December 7, 2011 on ABC News USA, and was subject to severe criticism, herself and her agency for doctoring the interview to show the Syrian leader as disconnected and crazy as the White House spokesperson put it then in a press conference based on the edited snaps of the interview ABC aired, before the Syrian FM spokesperson showed parts of the interview in a press conference, the entire interview which ABC producers thought the Syrians didn't have a copy of, and defaced ABC News, then only the US 'prominent' station had to air the raw interview..! And what a disconnected and crazy leader who manages to fight back against the overwhelming 'secret' orders by NATO member states to infiltrate his country thus far..?!!

Let's not forget how CNN, another prominent news agency, went with terrorists to Baba Amro in Homs, placed a camera, went to a site where an explosion would occur after 16 hours, back to the camera location to fix the angle, again back to the site of the explosion after it actually happened, the same was defaced by Syrian state tv, and could be the reason why Syrian channels are banned in many western countries, and even the Arab League western stooges issued a decree to take it off FTA satellite broadcasting, google "CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier" you might not like it.

So again: Who to believe? 
'They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, it's because you're foolable'

Check our post WMDs: Weapons of Mass Deception

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Al Arabiya News Channel Controls Information

We always complained about mainstream media not being unbiased and on the contrary they moved from being biased, to warmongering to an unimaginable level which is creating news.. Our post CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier sheds a light on how a CNN crew collaborated with the terrorists in blowing up an oil pipe-line in Baba Amro, Homs last year when the area was still under control of the terrorists aka FSA 'Free Syrian Army' aka Freedom Fighters, best known as Al Qaeda.

Yesterday a terrible war crime against humanity was committed by the NATO supported terrorists, FSA's Tawhid Brigade blew up a main fresh drinking water pipe in Aleppo, the largest Syrian city, the water pipe feeds more 2 major neighborhoods and cutting it until it's fixed affects more than 3 million human beings.

Aleppo is not a water rich city, the entire Middle East is not water rich, and among the Syrian cities Aleppo was the most thirsty city all times. Blowing up this main fresh drinking water pipe in the end of the summer when no rain is expected before one more month is a real catastrophe. Haven't these criminals committed enough catastrophic crimes already?

The criminals bragged about their crime in a YouTube video clip which disappeared later on but some of their sympathizers kept posting, one Syrian activist group known to download all the terrorists videos for analyzing kept a copy and uploaded it yesterday, within 2 hours of the first upload, and I made a copy here because it will be definitely removed by YouTube moderators: 


I said "before YouTube 'community standards' watchers remove it" because they removed a video I found on one of their  channels, I just added English translation (cc captions) and uploaded it again to my channel, the same video exactly with the same length and there's no copyright for it as it was aired on many news channels as well, but that's a different story, in case you're interested in following it up you can check this post on my google+ page: (https://plus.google.com/109902869737677938856/posts/emx86oNGea8).

Now back to blowing up the fresh drinking water pipe in Aleppo, today pan Arab Al Arabiya news channel, owned by a Saudi prince, posted a news post on its Facebook Page accusing the Syrian Army of blowing the same pipe by airplanes..! Well, since we have the evidence, the video clip, I tried to comment there on the same post that this was done by the FSA terrorists and here is the proof, but I found out that I was banned from commenting because of a similar incident at the very beginning of the crisis in Syria, so I sent the link to some friends and they managed to post it in comments: 


As you can clearly see, an activist posted the link to the YouTube video and accusing Al Arabiya of lying at (5 minutes ago), while the post time stamp says (28 minutes ago). The comment was deleted and another activist commented in the same time frame, 14 minutes after the post was posted but the first comment doesn't appear: 


As you can see in the above image, the activist posted the last comment appearing and the time stamp says (17 minutes ago) while the post itself was (31 minutes ago), that's 14 minutes after Al Arabiya published their post. 5 minutes later the admin of the Al Arabiya News Facebook Page removed the comment along with other comments, because it simply reveals who actually blew up the water pipe and not who Al Arabiya says did it.. 

At time stamp (59 minutes ago) there's no comments any more: 


Does this tell you anything? They control what the news into the narrative that suits their goals, and in this case the goal is, as it was since day one of the Syrian crisis, demonize the Syrian government and especially the Syrian president Bashar Al Assad to justify a foreign intervention, a 'humanitarian intervention' as the USA like to call it, because of all the atrocities committed in Syria and blamed on the Syrian legitimate government. If this doesn't wake you up, check the CNN post mentioned at the beginning of this post, and if that also didn't wake you up then there's nothing on Earth can wake you up.


Democracy will come in the shape of 'humanitarian intervention'..


'They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, it's because you're foolable'

Thursday, April 19, 2012

WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception

mainstream media logos

I'm sorry if I missed some in the above banner, there are so many of them and don't have time nor space for all of them, but the above are the leading worst of the rest.

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed" Mark Twain.

Shock and Awe, your enemy won't have time to grasp their breaths, so does your citizens, keep moving them from a conflict to another and they will keep supporting you. The Shock and Awe doesn't only apply on your enemies as you see, it applies on your people, your allies, foes, and no thanks to the mainstream media propaganda which keeps you on your feet awaiting to hear achievements and victories without questioning the credibility or source of information you are fed 24/7 non-stop.

Let's guess who controls the mainstream media? Well, let's not guess, it's all over the net now. I invite you NOT to read this article (Controlling Most US Media), it's a bit outdated but nevertheless the info it contains has barely changed. 


Do you believe in Conspiracy Theory? Of course you don't, you are not stupid, this is only for the silly, naive and shallow people, you are much more sophisticated than such stuff and you don't want to look dumb among your friends, nobody believes the Conspiracy Theory because the world is only led by the good people and nobody ever plans anything, especially in Free Media (you won't click the link under Free Media because you don't believe in the silly Conspiracy Theory thing). But maybe you should spend 20 minutes reading what's in this article and comparing to your surroundings: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Now back to our story, when the Shock and Awe fails and the conflict takes more time, people will start thinking, they're not supposed to, but what to do, it's a human nature, and you have to deal with it, in this case the only solution lies with Mainstream Media, you control it, or those who control it are your allies, ask them to intensify their propaganda, each news bulletin should have at least a line or two in its headlines about your cause, analysts should be available to discuss your point of view, you can accept some criticism but make sure those criticizing you don't have the last words, bring someone to ridicule their replies and carry on, reports should be available, and if you don't have news: create some for God sake.. Your plans will fail if the public starts asking questions.

With the introduction of social media and then citizen journalists who needs to verify credibility, so many blogs I personally wrote about the use of these tools to carry out the media campaign to justify the cause of demonizing your enemy then justifying their killings. The audience when they keep flipping from one news outlet to another to find the same news of such: "dictator killing own people' and 'public uprisings brutally oppressed by tyrants' they'll have no other choice but to buy such stuff, nobody would care to search for the other side of the story, so many sides your friends in mainstream media are providing, and if you don't believe it there're plenty of Youtube videos to prove it, and it just happens that all these videos (over 64,000 in the case of Syria) are so much filling the pattern: shaky videos from mobile phones, breathless citizens running across the streets, so much blood everywhere, sounds of explosions, and if that's not available make it! 

Some examples in the Libyan case were the so many times Saif ulislam Gaddafi was arrested before he was actually arrested, and his brother Khamis was so many times killed before he was actually killed, or maybe not..! The anti-Gaddafi protests and rebels reaching Bab Alaziziya in Benghazi and Doha in Qatar that looks similar to the real one in Tripoli, Libya.. and so on. Al Jazeera's Fake Green Square. (for example)

Al Jazeera tried to do the same in Syria by building miniatures similar to known sites in different cities of the country and fake demonstrations near it, their infamous try was with the miniature of the Clock Tower in Homs which some real activists blew the attempt when comparing the real Clock Tower with the fake ones that kept appearing on this NATO mouthpiece.

And here is where the Shock and Awe failed, the prolonged conflict in Syria gave time to many to revise and compare news aired on mainstream media with the actual ones, and the same Al Jazeera in coordination with its sister channel Al Arabiya exposed themselves when they were given information that the Zero hour in Syria is imminent and simultaneously both channels started broadcasting on an early Friday news of tens of thousands of anti-Assad protesters fill two mains squares in Damascus city, the Abbasid and Ommayad squares, thinking by this they're giving the signal to NATO stooges to flood these two squares and at the same time to push those curious to go there to see for themselves then there will be ready planted 'activists' who will be filming any crowd, airing the same via satellite connections on those two pathetic channels who in turn will magnify the picture same like what they did with the initial Tahrir square (the article was manipulated later by Al Arabiya & the link image mentioned in it that shows stitching of several images to give impression of huge crowds, the image was removed for unknown reason), they failed because those plotting are not Syrians and not aware of so much of reality not starting with the laziness of Syrians on a Friday morning that nothing would move them other than bringing Foul or Fattah ingredients, no politics, no NATO and nothing else would cause a Syrian to gather anywhere on a Friday morning, then the main punch to their plot was the fact that the Syrian state tv's head quarters is in the centre of Ommayad Square itself, overseeing all 7 main roads branching from the square from a single angle, and that on Friday morning there's a live tv programme, and the fact that all Syrians know this pushed them to switch from Al Jazeera & Arabiya channels immediately to Syrian tv to see from the studio how that lie was exposed, furthermore, the presenters were notified of the fake news aired on those two pathetic channels, and the presenters would look over their shoulders onto the square to see how normal lazy Friday morning cars are moving that time, and the TV crews were immediately dispatched to the streets of both squares to interview people who ridiculed that step, a final punch to the two stations credibility.
What's left of the original image on the net, the original one was hundreds of times bigger than this




Another pathetic attempt was by the French France24 channel that cut a live cross talk show to announce the resignation of the Syrian Ambassador to France Ms. Lamia Shakkour because of the 'brutal oppression by president Assad's regime' as they put it, then to receive a fake phone from someone claiming to be Ms. Shakkour, just like a drama show, and at the end had to deny the story after receiving a harsh criticism by Ms. Shakkour in a press conference and the ambassador's threats to file a legal case against the channel. This pathetic attempt was meant to embarrass the ambassador and encourage, as they thought, other ambassadors to resign worldwide, such attempt didn't live more than 20 minutes (Al Jazeera channel insists on the resignation while the ambassador was on phone with Syrian state tv denouncing such news as cheap). And just for the record, this attempt was on June 8, 2011 and  till date there's not a single resignation of any Syrian ambassador worldwide, nor any diplomat to the level of 3rd secretary in a consulate!


Shocking propaganda isn't limited to cheap channels receiving such crap, digesting it and feeding the digested crap to their Sheeple audience, when there's no crap to broadcast they create it! It's difficult to believe because who would risk credibility for propaganda? Not when the prize is destroying Syria and not if they thought they can get away with it, and intelligence agencies informed them that the Syrian 'regime' would fall in few days so they went for the plot to the extent that a prominent US news channel actually plotted destroying oil pipelines in Homs in direct coordinating with terrorists to accuse the Syrian army of shelling them to punish the people. This channel, CNN, was defaced by the Syrian state tv and I discussed in an earlier post (CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier). 


A reporter for Al Jazeera using high-tech satellite devices spies on the Libyan Army communication in this report and brags about it, remember that Colonel Gaddafi was demonized a long while ago and therefore it's fine to spy on his forces by a 'Journalist' who shares the information with 'freedom fighters', then don't wonder why such reporters become targets in retaliations by regular forces tracing the spying devices: 


The role such mainstream media plays is vital for NATO, they're spies, they can reach places without suspicion, can smuggle communication devices to insurgents duped 'freedom fighters' and contributes to the military aggression. Their role is not only to demonize foes, but moved into an uglier phase of actually contributing to the military actions and sabotage.

You can understand the decision of Syrian government to expel foreign reporters from Syria at the beginning of riots in the country last year and then allowing selective reporters to enter, even those who entered based on pressure on the Syrian government by the UN and non-governmental organizations (other NATO tools), those reporters manipulated reports, interviews, and even when sending unbiased reports to their stations, the stations do not broadcast their reports, the same thing that happened with Al Arabiya reporter Hanna Houshan several times and was scolded by Syrian Foreign Minister Mr. Moallem on several occasions for the same. 

Yet, the most alarming interview distorted by a foreign prominent news channel was the one ABC News reporter Barbara Walters did with president Assad himself and doctored, edited, distorted the whole interview before was forced to air the original full unedited interview after the Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesperson showed them that they have a copy of the same interview in full..! (Check it here).


The BBC had its share in Syria's crisis and again put its credibility at risk just for the sake of promoting propaganda on Syria, despite willingly and fully knowing the level of deception it's involved in, but still takes accounts of terrorists and their lies at its shows with no shame and no responsibility and no respect to its own image and the sacrifices of many of its own reporters in shaping that image. In an earlier post I explained how the BBC Promoted a Terrorists to a Victim


The Guardian has proved to be a mouthpiece for the criminals, you can see interviews with convicted criminals on it criminalizing others, who usually are the subject of the demonizing policy, and if you as a reader try to point out the fact that the interviewed is a convicted criminal they delete your comment, ban you from further comments and sends you a nasty email reminding you with their Community Standards! This happened with me personally when I commented once on an interview with Ali Sadr Al Din Bayanoni, a convicted terrorist and head of an outlaw terrorists organization (as per the records of his native country), who named the sitting Syrian president Bashar Al Assad with all bad names he could dig from his vocabulary he learned from his gangs including calling the Syrian president a criminal and a thug and other bad words, they deleted my comment and reminded me that it's against their community standards to call a writer of their articles a criminal!!


Reuters reporter on Syria, a Jordanian citizen Mr. Oweis was arrested by Syrian authorities at the beginning of the riots in Syria for faking a report on the events and putting words in an injured soldier's mouth to show him as saying that he was shot by fellow officers for refusing to shoot at peaceful protesters when the injured soldier was shouting with the loudest faint voice he could that the shots he received were from the protesters side he's facing and not from his back. The reporter's bad luck was when a Syrian tv reporter was next close to him and recorded the incident on his own camera, and when all news houses taking reports from Reuters aired the doctored interview where the soldier's voice can't be heard clearly and only the reporter's voice is heard putting words in the soldier's mouth, the Syrian TV aired the film recorded by its own staff showing the Reuters reporter and the real dialogue that happened! ABC News of Australia learned a lesson after airing a Reuters report on Syria and here is what they had to say:



There's nothing called Free Media, whoever pays for the media house either by shareholders contribution or by advertisements controls to a very large extent the strategy of these media houses. Do you think social media is more credible as unbiased free speech supporters providing you with a platform to voice your opinion? Think again. At least with the Syrian issue where we see and been seeing Facebook deleting continuously a page dedicated for a real Free Speech supporting Syrian youth group calling themselves The Syrian Electronic Army over 150 times by now and as soon as the page appears back again, accusing them of showing disturbing images, while they keep another page called 'The Syrian Revolution Against Bashar Al Assad' which shows bodies slashed into pieces, beating by terrorists in army uniforms to accuse the Syrian army, and so on, this is not of course, in their scale, against their community standards. They once deleted a picture I posted of a US Army soldier bragging on top of a dead boy's body in Afghanistan claiming it 'violates Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities', again while they keep supporting the same page that is working to demonize the Syrian president:


Link to Facebook Wall Photo
The Weapons of Mass Deception have much more damaging effects than those of Mass Destruction, they destroy the brain in addition to animalizing the human or in better words: producing the Sheeple audience.


We Warned You

Donate

Donate
Donate to Help Us Continue