NATO-sponsored Muslim Brotherhood Former Govt. Officials Arrested in Tunisia

Tunisian governments were rounded up and charged with terrorism by the judiciary across Tunisia, North Africa.

The video is also available on Rumble and BitChute.

The charges include sponsoring and facilitating terrorist groups and more importantly, the case known as the 'Transfer' in Tunisia, the transferring of thousands of youth from Tunisia and other countries to where the USA needed to spread 'democracy' and 'freedoms', most of those ended up in the ranks of al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria.

Ennahda Movement, Tunisia's branch of the Muslim Brotherhood global organization headed by the NATO leader, the Turkish madman Erdogan, saw its governments overthrown by elections after their corruption and reports of involvement in terrorism could not be hidden anymore.

The main tipping point was when Syria returned to Tunisia dozens of Tunisian terrorists fighting in the ranks of Al Qaeda and ISIS (ISIL - Daesh) were arrested by the Syrian security and Syrian Arab Army, and documents showing hundreds of others killed in Syria.

NATO member state Turkey was the main conduit for these terrorists, and Tunisia under the Muslim Brotherhood Ennahda was the regional hub to gather them from across northern Africa.

Among the arrested officials is Ennahda's strongman shadowy security figure Fat'hi Al-Baldi, a 'security advisor' in the Tunisian Ministry of Interior.

More in this report including the transcript of the above video: Tunisian Authorities Detain Dozens of Ennahda Officials for Terror.

---

Your objective comments are always welcome.

The Turkish Madman Erdogan is the Only Obstacle to Restoring Peace in Libya

The Turkish madman, NATO's second most powerful leader, the anti-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood hypocrite, and the war criminal Erdogan is the only obstacle impeding the restoration of peace and security in NATO-destroyed Libya.

I was tasked a leading role in the Greater Middle East Project (aka Greater Israel Project) by George W. Bush.
~Recep Tayyib Erdogan in an interview on Turkish TV channel

That was a couple of years before the beginning of the US-led NATO-sponsored regime changes in the Arab world dubbed the Arab Spring, a series of colored revolutions that aimed to install puppet regimes led by members of the radical anti-Islamic global group called the Muslim Brotherhood, the same group which Al-Qaeda's leader Zawahiri came from and its political head is Erdogan.

They reached power in Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, and western Libya where the capital Tripoli is, parts of southern Yemen, Sudan, they tried to take Algeria but were pushed back, they are still trying to take parts of Syria. After a year in total power in Egypt having the president and the majority of parliament from their members they were ousted by the Egyptian army, they were unseated last a little over a month ago in Tunisia, and they lost most of the territories they controlled through their military wing ISIS and Al Qaeda Levant (aka Nusra Front) in Syria, now they're on the verge of losing Libya as well.

NATO and Israel loyal servant Erdogan has a role that he insists on continuing to play no matter how many thousands of innocent people are slaughtered, he doesn't want to lose Libya.

Husni Mahali, is a seasoned Turkish journalist and was a friend of Erdogan before the latter threw him in prison for criticizing Erdogan's policies against Syria which turned harmonic relations between the neighboring countries to complete enmity, Mahali talks about the latest efforts by Libya's neighboring countries to help restore peace there and who's the real obstacle in that: Libya and the Neighboring Countries Agree..and Turkey will not Withdraw.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

Erdogan Losing His Muslim Brotherhood Radical Regimes, Tunisia and Libya Next?

Erdogan, the Turkish madman, the political head of the anti-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood radical 'takfiri' group, and NATO's second strongest leader worked hard to establish a web of puppet regimes across the Islamic world, especially in the Arab countries infested by the US-led 'Arab Spring' colored revolutions, these puppet regimes consider the Turkish pariah as their undisputed caliph, he's been working on this project ever since George W. Bush tasked him to lead in the US plot dubbed the 'Greater Middle East', which is literally the same 'Greater Israel' project.'

Erdogan succeeded in the first test in Tunisia in northern Africa, the first Arabic country to be the 'cradle' of the 'Arab Spring', his radical stooges of the Ennahda political party were the only party organized and ready to take over once the hour zero is triggered. However, in Tunisia, the Ennahda did not directly assume power, they led from behind, they slowly took over the parliament and started installing their assets in the main public sector.

Second to fall was Egypt, the largest Arab country by population and Erdogan was flying high when his Muslim Brotherhood took over to the extent they had their president, they controlled the parliament, and they started infesting the main public sector including the army, the Muslim Brotherhood president Morsi handpicked the new Minister of Defense Sisi to replace those high ranking officers who helped takeover from Mubarak.

Erdogan already controls Gaza through his Hamas group, nobody served Israel better than the current Hamas political bureau.

In Qatar, the gas station state and the source of all funding needed, Erdogan had it in his smallest pocket by converting the rulers of this tiny Persian Gulf state into his NATO-friendly Islam-enemy Muslim Brotherhood doctrine.

The biggest prize would have been Syria, after a huge success with Muslim Brotherhood fanatic groups like Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the FSA along with hundreds of other smaller groups taking over large areas of lands starting with remote and border areas and marched toward Damascus, Erdogan started spewing his dream to the public: he wants to revive the most-hated by all nations the Ottoman Empire and he wants to be its new sultan.

He didn't stop there, with the abundance of money coming from Qatar, huge media, and political support from NATO, Israel, and the Gulfies, Erdogan's Muslim Brotherhood were gaining control in Morocco and Libya as well and were trying to revive their old groups in Algeria, he included Sudan as a bonus and sent thousands of Al Qaeda terrorists into southern Yemen. Let's not forget that ISIS was also threatening Baghdad and Erbil, the largest Iraqi cities at the same time.

When facing a roadblock in Syria and thanks only to the steadfastness and heroic resilience of the Syrian people, Syria was not broken and the world started to wake up to the reality of these terrorist groups after the shocking crimes and massacres were finally released to the international public opinion. In May 2013, the Lebanese Hezb Allah party entered the war in Syria against ISIS and Al Qaeda first in Qussayr near the borders with Lebanon where around 30,000 Lebanese live in villages within Syria, and to protect a number of shrines sacred by the Shia-ideologized party watching the terrorists of ISIS and the Free Syrian Army blowing the historical shrines in every place they infested.

By September 2015, Russia woke up to the imminent danger of Erdogan's terrorist groups and Putin realized that if he did not stop these terrorist groups in Syria, he will soon 'have to fight them on the streets of Moscow and St. Petersburg' as he explained several times later on.

Now the tide is turning back and Syria is reversing the Muslim Brotherhood domino effect, first in Egypt, after the Muslim Brotherhood President declared Jihad, a holy war against Syria, the Egyptian Army took over and his own handpicked minister of defense Sisi led a military coup and jailed all the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sisi, in addition to the obvious plot the MB was working on to sacrifice the Egyptian Army in an unwinnable fight against the Syrian Arab Army, had enough evidence of plots against Egypt's own national security, a phone recording was presented in which the MB President Morsi was discussing the plot with no other than his buddy in the Muslim Brotherhood organization Zawahiri, the head of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

An Egyptian intelligence general was asked on Egypt's TV why were they tapping the phone of their president he replied: we weren't, we were listening to the phone calls of the head of Al Qaeda when we heard Morsi calling him!

Losing Egypt and not winning Syria was very hard for Erdogan to accept so he declared Egypt as an enemy state, collected all the opposition figures who are against the Egyptian state in his country Turkey and played as Britain, a dumpster for traitors and outlawed opposition members who would resort to any method to harm their countries.

Another loss for Erdogan was in Libya when a general suddenly appeared called Haftar and started marching toward the Libyan capital Tripoli.

The Gulfies siege on their little sister Qatar was another danger that Erdogan made his country Turkey an enemy for all the most powerful Saudi and UAE in the Gulf Council. Erdogan sent up to 60,000 Turkish cannon fodder army personnel to protect the Qatari ruling family.

Sudan was not a real asset for Erdogan, his role there was limited to help divide the country into two parts and losing the southern Sudanese part to an enemy state for the northern Sudanese part, NATO's divide and conquer at work.

The waters became murky for the Erdogan men in Tunisia, their corruption scandals were getting exposed, their betrayal to their country and loyalty to Erdogan was not hidden anymore when the head of the Ennahda who also heads the Tunisian parliament paid a secret visit to Erdogan and pledged his allegiance to his Muslim Brotherhood boss, the visit was exposed, added to it the Ennahda failure in presenting any workable government during more than 10 years in absolute power in Tunisia, plus the pandemic setbacks, the assassinations of notables of the Tunisian political community, their refusal to pass a law incriminating the recognition of Israel, all the slogans they raised to assume power they worked against it.

Finally, and after riots started to go out of hand in Tunisia, the Tunisian president uses the only power left for him in the constitution and froze the Parliament controlled by Ennahda, fired the government also controlled by Ennahda even though the prime minister was the president's pick but he swiftly turned to what he thought was the more powerful party against his president, and Erdogan is furious afraid fo losing Tunisia which is almost a done deal.

Husni Mahali, a career Turkish journalist, a former close friend of Erdogan to the extent that Erdogan jailed him for merely criticizing his policies against Syria, Erdogan jails more of the people who helped him throughout his power climbing than of his enemies, Mr. Mahali wrote an analysis about the prospect of Erdogan losing Tunisia and maybe Libya afterward in an article for the Lebanese Al Mayadeen news, I translated to English here: After Egypt, will Erdogan lose Tunisia and then Libya?

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

The Rise of the Caliphate

Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him has mentioned the rise of the caliphates after his death then how the caliphate would collapse and kingdoms would ensue, then after a while a new Caliphate would rise and lead the nation once again.

Enemies of Islam have read this prophecy and understood it quite well to the extent they manipulated many Muslims in following it. New sects of Islam had to be invented, sects which look like Islam but would work against the tolerance religion, again in another Hadith (words of the prophet) it was mentioned: 'My nation would split into few & seventy sects, all are misguided except one which will remain following my preaching'. Wahhabism was invented by the Brits and used since. Salafism was taken by Wahhabism and it grew very strong especially after Abdul Aziz Al Saud used it to gain influence over Arabia and called it after his family's name.

Wahhabism for Islam is just like Zionism to Judaism and KKK for Christianity, if not worse. Every extremism in any belief or ideology would work against the cause of that belief or ideology naturally, so imagine when it was founded to destroy that belief or ideology.

Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him described a group of people he called Khawarij (Outlaws of Islam), he said they'll be looking like Muslims, growing beards but not shaping it unlike Muslims, wearing shorter dresses, while Muslims are only told to wear dresses that do not touch the ground while walking to avoid filth picked from the ground, he added these group of people will recur multiple times, they will be killing Muslims and making allies with enemies of Islam. Does that sound familiar? Look at the Wahhabi clerics and the followers of Wahhabism how close they are in Saudi & Qatar to the Zionist leaders of the west.

The Zionist leaders of the west have used Wahhabi followers to further their goals, the military wing of Wahhabism is Al Qaeda in its different names depending on the region it is, its political wing regionally is called the Muslim Brotherhood and its international movement is under the wing of Hizbul Tahrir. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQyBHj9vQF4

Note how in this documentary this Hizbul Tahrir enjoys freedom in practicing its call for establishing the Caliphate which is supposed to unite Muslims and control their huge nation which naturally should be a threat to the Zionist hegemony, but by organizing it into this system: Al Qaeda fighters, Muslim Brotherhood political parties and Hizbul Tahrir international body, the Zionists dream of keeping the control on the inevitable coming Muslim Ummah (nation) and its leader the Caliph.

This might explain the dream of the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan of becoming a Caliph over Muslims, and the cancerous Muslim Brotherhood parties in the countries falling into the well designed Arab Spring ,or as Condoleezza Rice put it: 'Creative Chaos'.

They fool you, they keep fooling you & they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart,
it's because you're foolable.

Americans Are Always Behind - Arab Spring

The Arab Spring was against dictators not accepting to share power with other dictators wannabes, if you think this is not the case, look at the countries infected with this disease: Egypt has a new pharaoh, Tunisia has a new radical fanatic Islamist coalition, Libya is run by also radical fanatic Islamist thugs, Yemen, well.. in Yemen, nothing changed except the country is highly unstable and becoming more divided by the day, I won't get in details in Syria as the picture is more clearer and becoming clearer by the day: trying to replace a secular state with again radical fanatic Islamist thugs group known as Al Qaeda Levant or FSA, Free Syrian Army! 

But a 'spring' should be a spring that will spring off the dictatorship with all miseries that come with it and change the winter & autumn into a lovely spring, but to learn what exactly happened in the Arab Spring, watch this figure closely: 

Arab Spring found

And instead of democracies flourishing, Beardocracy reigned. 

Beardocracy, the new type of ruling the masses

The cost of replacing democracies with 'beardocracies' doesn't matter, one of the hired leading Wahhabi scholars to promote beardocracy said, ironically from Tahrir square in Egypt post Mubarak: 'so what if 100,000 Syrians die for toppling Assad's government?' Another said: 'It's fine to kill one third of the population in order to make the other 2 thirds happy', imagine applying in it in Syria: one third = 7.2 million human beings.

And in case you think that the 'Arab Spring' was a spontaneous public uprising and it's what the Arabs in infected countries wanted, I highly advise you to check this: The Arab Spring, A Spontaneous Public Uprising Or Is It? 

Until now this is fine for people in the west, what do they care for after all? Don't they have enough problems to worry about at home? Healthcare, welfare, education, jobs, taxes, foreclosures.. But wait, if the westerns have so many problems back home and it's mostly financially related, why spending billions to promote 'beardocracies' in the Middle East & North Africa region? And selectively, like in some countries the billions are sent to promote this, while in others very much needy to change we don't see any efforts by western countries. 

Religiously Prohibited in Saudi & Religiously
Encouraged in Syria

Instead of wasting so much billions across the planet to replace secular based ruling countries with fanatic radical Islamists (note not Islamic, Islamists) dictatorship regimes, why not spending it at home to better the lives of westerns themselves? 

Sit back, allocate half an hour of your precious time and enjoy watching the following brilliant clip titled The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation to learn where a real Spring is mostly needed, not a dark winter duped a spring to replace humanity with evil: 

By the way, the same applies to people in UK, France, Germany, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Japan, South Korea... 

Did you know that the cost of running one aircraft carrier in high ocean reaches half a billion dollars a day? That's $500,000,000 every single day, for what? Defending US land from invaders? Do you know that the Zionist Settlers Colony aka Israel receives a sum of $8.2 million a day from US taxpayers? That's enough money to give $100,000 to 8 families each single day, and that's only in direct cash payments not to mention discounts on weapons & machinery purchases which US citizens themselves don't dream of, and it's been the case for the past several decades, while at the same time in the US itself there's 15% of the population on food stamps, that means there are about 50 million US citizens living without proper income on the account of the other US taxpayers. What a great foreign policy your country practice, and what are those aid money used for by israel? Yes, an Iron Dome & a Pillar of Cloud against the largest concentration camp on the planet, the Gaza Strip.

Zionist settlers Pillar of Cloud against Gaza

If you think killing Palestinian civilians in Gaza is more important than your own welfare in the USA then check the nearest psychiatrist. 

Hope you enjoyed the above post and the clip attached, now concentrate carefully on the following image: 

They fool you, they keep fooling you & they enjoy fooling you,
not because they're smart, it's because you're foolable.

The Top Ten Myths about the Arab Spring of 2011 - Or Facts?

Under the above subject a professor Juan Cole talks about what he thinks are the 'myths' of the Arab Spring in a view to confirming what he saw in NATO-aligned news channels like foxNews and al Jazeera, we try to discuss each of the 'myths' to see where he was biased and where he might touch the truth.


"1. The upheavals of 2011 were provoked by the Bush administration’s overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq Bzzt! Wrong answer. None of the young people who made this year’s revolutions ever pointed to Iraq as an inspiration. The only time Iraq was even brought up in their tweets was as a negative example (“let’s not let ourselves be divided by sectarianism, since that is what the Americans did in Iraq.”) Americans are so full of self-admiration that they cannot see Iraq as it is, and as it is perceived in the Arab world. Iraq is not a shining city on a hill for them. It is a violent place riddled with sectarian hatred, manipulated by the United States, and suffering from poor governance and dysfunctional politics. I did interviewing with activists last summer in Tunisia and Egypt. The youth do not want to be like Iraq! They want to be like Turkey, or, now, Tunisia."


Under the first 'myth', the author talks about the crazy war the US former president George W Bush & his UK ally in crime Tony Blair waged on an independent sovereign country abbreviating the entire invasion of Iraq in 'overthrowing the leader of that country'. Obviously such a start is not promising one if you are seeking reality vs warmongering, however, we can tell the author that the invasion of Iraq was part of the NATO plan to take out 7 Middle Eastern countries starting with Iraq and including: Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran, a plan which was put in place 9 days after 9/11 and guess what? After the very high cost of invading Iraq and after the funds started drying up the NATO led by USA reverted to plan B which was already in process, a public revolution or uprising by the citizens of countries opposing NATO hegemony instead of directly getting involved, such revolutions were taking place in former USSR states and what was known as the Eastern Bloc of countries dubbed 'Colored Revolutions'. Lebanon worked in 2005 and they had to facilitate or for the time being we'll use the term 'abused' the assassination of a former Lebanese Prime Minister to ignite the 'Revolution'. Somalia was a huge stain in the memory so instead of invading they besieged the country till a famine was in place then fueled many sides who took arms against each other, till date. Libya, no need to remind the author that a 'Responsibility to Protect' 5,000 civilians from an alleged claim that the Libyan leader then Gaddafi wanted to kill, so they invaded the country and slaughtered over 60,000 civilians (& counting). The plan in Sudan was not that different from the one of Somalia where NATO fueled Southern Sudanese rebels and Darfour Rebels and even rebels to the east of the country under so many names and one reason 'Spreading Democracy', but no invasion was needed because the leader accepted the defeat and signed a deal to split one/third of his country and gift it to NATO agents. The biggest fails were Iran and now we're witnessing Syria. Iran 'Spring' was in 2009, and didn't work out in favor of NATO wishing because it's simply a founded civilization of thousands of years vs unfounded civilization of few decades, so deeply rooted intelligence won the battle and still fighting the war, and Syria now is almost the same redo of Iran. Of course Egyptian Mubarak was more dangerous because the guy was over 83 years of age, was very sick and wanted to pass the presidency to his son which would cause a huge chaos that might go out of hands so the USA orchestrated the 'ousting' of Mubarak to keep things under the control of their allies in the Military Council 'SCAF'. And the same goes for Tunisia Ben Ali, who was old and very weak in leadership or in other words: his political role expired; if you knew that he was selected by Italian intelligence to replace the former president Habib Bourguiba you'll know who controls his expiration date.


"2. President Obama was wrong to ask Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to step down. This position has been taken by Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. It is a crazy thing to say. Mubarak could not have stayed in power, with nearly a million people in the streets and order breaking down in the country. If anything Obama was far too slow to act, and there was danger of Egypt turning seriously anti-American if he had not stepped in when he did. Trying to keep a dictator in power who has worn out his welcome is always a big mistake on the part of a great power, as was seen in the case of the shah of Iran."


Read our previous comment re the visit of Egyptian Chief of Staff to the USA to know how and who orchestrated the ousting of Mubarak, and who has the right to ask for it, keeping in mind that Mubarak refused to leave when asked by his friends in KSA and israel as well as he refused the calls by his people, he only left after Obama asked him! And just to prove how less informed the author is re the millions in the streets we refer him to this youtube video illustration (by the way, the entire post on gigapan.org was removed later for unknown reason - reduce the volume in the video and watch the doctoring of the photo that starts at 0:33 minute of the video).


"3. Muslim radicalism benefited from the revolutions in the Arab world. So far, at least, the beneficiaries of the upheavals have been both secular, left-leaning dissidents and Muslim religious parties. Neither is violent. In Tunisia, the new president, Moncef Marzouki, is a staunch secularist. The al-Nahda (Ennahda) religious party got about 40 percent of the seats in parliament. But neither sort of movement is radical or violent. Likewise, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is now peaceful and talks moderately, and is attacked for it by the radicals such as Ayman al-Zawahiri. Muslim radicals have not been able to take advantage of these largely peaceful movements in the way they could of George W. Bush’s invasion and occupation of Iraq, which really did fuel the spread of violent extremism. Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman of Yemen argues that if democracy can be achieved in the Arab world, it will finish off violent extremism, which only flourishes under dictatorship."


In reply to this argument or 'Myth' as the author call it, we'll just point to his own point number 10 in the very same blog post where he literally says: "While it is true that the Muslim religious parties coming to power in Tunisia and Egypt are more sympathetic to the Palestinians than were Ben Ali and Mubarak, the issue is more complex than that." trying to justify the stance towards israel the author contradicting himself, as in Tunisia the president he's referring to has less power than the govt ran by radical Islamist's now, and in Egypt it's the Military which is still in power although as he confirms that about 40% of the parliament seats are taken by the Muslim Brotherhood..! So did they benefit or they didn't, Mr. Author?! By the way, I think the author forgot to mention Libya which have a very radical Islamic rulers now with an extremists radicals controlling the rebels..


"4. Muslim religious groups spear-headed the revolutions. This allegation is made by Iran from one side and Western conservatives from the other. It is for the most part incorrect. Leftists, secularists, workers and students made the revolutions. The Muslim forces had often been devastated by government persecution and were weak (Tunisia) or had been made a junior partner in governance and were reluctant to risk entirely losing that position (Egypt). In Egypt, the revolutionaries are referred to in Arabic as the thuwar, and they are contrasted to the Muslim Brotherhood and other forces. In Egypt, it is these secularists and leftista who are are still calling for demonstrations in Tahrir Square. The most effective revolutionaries in Libya, the Berbers of the Western Mountain region and the urban street fighters of Misrata, were the least fundamentalist in orientation. While the Muslim religious parties may be good at organizing to win elections and so are perhaps the main beneficiaries of the revolutions politically, they did not make the revolutions themselves."


The term 'spear-headed' is so true the author used in denying it, because they were not planning it, but they were the tool behind the movements in financing it and in demonizing the govt to fuel the crowds by committing crimes under the guise of govt forces, their role is being uncovered in Syria where the Muslim Brotherhood branch had to carry out the jobs publicly and unashamedly because all their initial plots failed. Watch this interview with Dr. Webster Trapley reporting from Syria. 


"5. The uprising in Bahrain was merely a manifestation of sectarian tensions between Sunni and Shiite. The protesters in Bahrain included reformist Sunni Muslims. And the conservative forces pressuring the king to crack down on the crowds included the country’s great merchant families which comprise both Sunnis and Shiites. The struggle in these islands, like that elsewhere in the Arab world, was over authoritarian forms of government versus popular democracy, accountability and transparency. The king’s constitution allows him to over-rule both houses of parliament, allows him to appoint the upper house, and allows it to over-rule the lower house. The Shiite protesters were upset that these arrangements, along with gerrymandering that reduced Shiite representation, preventing the majority from asserting itself (Shiites are about 58% of the population). But the discourse was about constitutional monarchy, not about Shiite rule or an Iran-style Shiite theocracy, with some small exceptions." 


& 


"6. Iran was behind the uprising in Bahrain. There is no good evidence for this allegation, which is the basis for the Saudi and United Arab Emirates military intervention on behalf of the Sunni Arab monarchy. Bahrain’s Shiites are Arabs and probably a majority of them belong to the conservative Akhbari school of jurisprudence, which rejects ayatollahs in favor of the ability of laypeople to interpret the law for themselves. Bahrain Shiites of the Usuli school, prevalent in Iran and Iraq, are more likely to look for leadership to Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani in Najaf, Iraq, than to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. Bahrain’s Shiites claim educational and workplace discrimination, and dispute a constitution and electoral system that disadvantages them. They are not agents of Iran."


The author here writes with conscious because the fact in this case cannot be covered although he kept the last doubting words: "with some small exceptions"! However, we would like to thank him for unwillingly proving our first reply above that the plot is to demonize Iran among the other countries then to make it a target for radicals to attack, same thing that happened with Gaddafi's will to kill his own people, Mubarak and his $70 Billion as well as his ruthless oppression on peaceful protesters, and now president Assad of Syria whom they claim is shelling 'peaceful protesters with tanks' without providing a single proof, although there are over 65,000 video clips uploaded to the social networks, not a single one out of all of them  actually shows a tank shelling anywhere, let alone protesters although again they show you so many tanks on roads.. well, thankfully it's not flying tanks. You can apply a small logic thing: a bullet can wound or kill a human being, a tank projectile can down a whole building, so imagine if one tank projectile was fired on thousands of 'peaceful protesters' flooding the streets!! 


"7. The Arab Spring is a Western plot. This allegation was made by the Qaddafis in Libya and is currently asserted by many in Syria’s Baath Party. Nothing could be farther from the truth. It is quite clear that the upheavals in the Arab world came as a surprise to the G8 nations, and were mostly at least initially unwelcome. France’s minister of defense offered help with police training to Zine El Abidine Ben Ali’s Tunisia once the demonstrations got going last year this time. The US initially signalled support for Hosni Mubarak during the rallies against him of late January. Hillary Clinton said she was sure that the Mubarak regime was “stable.” Vice President Joe Biden was constrained to deny that Mubarak was “a dictator.” Obama only saw the writing on the wall with regard to Egypt at the last minute, and was starting to be a target of protest posters in Tahrir Square. The US was reluctant to lose an ally against al-Qaeda in Yemen such as Ali Abdullah Saleh, and still has never sanctioned him for killing hundreds of innocent protesters. Washington was likewise unhappy with the uprising in Bahrain, and at most urged the king to find a compromise (the US Fifth Fleet is headquartered in the capital, Manama, and so the US did not feel itself in a position to support the protesters strongly). Obama was famously reluctant to get involved in Libya. There is substantial ambivalence over the upheaval in Syria, and so far the main form of intervention is targeted financial sanctions. If there is anything that is already clear as we catch history on the run here, it is that the uprisings were spontaneous, indigenous, centered on dissatisfied youth, and that and presented the status quo Powers with unwelcome challenges." 


We refer you to our reply on point number 1, add to it the role of CANVAS Camp in Serbia and its heavy role in the 'Arab Spring' events and other colored revolutions as briefly explained here about Revolution U article in Foreign Policy Magazine and if we know that this camp is affiliated by many USA think tanks and we know the links of such think tanks to policy makers there.. we get a great idea how "spontaneous" and a "surprise to the G8 leaders" was the 'Arab Spring' and how it's away from being a "Western Plot". If you are familiar with Arabic or Turkish languages we ask you to visit our previous post to see an in-depth report on the role of CIA, US Think tanks, CANVAS and the 'surprising spontaneous public uprisings'. 


"8. The intervention of NATO in Libya was driven primarily by oil. European sanctions on Libya began being dropped in the late 1990s, and US sanctions were lifted in 2004. Western oil companies had sunk billions into the Libyan petroleum sector by 2011, and it is highly unlikely that they would have wanted to risk instability there or the advent of a new government that might not honor their bids. The oil majors suffered substantial losses because of the loss of Libyan production last spring and summer. The conservative government of David Cameron in the UK and that of Nicola Sarkozy in France allegedly feared that if Qaddafi were allowed to crush the Libyan reformers by main force, he might drive them into the arms of al-Qaeda, as had happened in Algeria in the early 1990s. And, they may have feared that Qaddafi would provoke a big exodus to Europe at a time when European economies are poorly situated to absorb such immigrants in large numbers. Sarkozy may have felt the need for a quick victory to bolster his position in the polls ahead of next year’s presidential elections. Cameron, as a conservative, may have sought to rehabilitate the use of military force to enforce international order, which had been tarnished in UK public opinion by the Iraq disaster. Those who say Europe would not have intervened in the absence of the petroleum factor forget the Balkans, which presented similar challenges of massive violence on Europe’s doorstep. Likewise, oil isn’t everything; Bahrain has very little, and so it cannot explain Washington’s reluctance to lambaste the monarchy there. To argue that Western Europe had interests in Libya that drove its intervention is common sense. To peg everything to oil is vulgar Marxism." 


Well, not only oil, you can add gas, you can read this article in NY Times for the race for Libya's oil, add to it the war on gas and the failure of the Nabucco Gas Pipeline project and the fact that Qatar has bought the Libyan oil for the coming 5 years at a fixed $80 a barrel to cover the cost of war, while at nowadays the barrel of oil is $99 & $107 at the time of writing this post, and the fact that Libya's share can reach 1.7 million barrels per day! France which was the 'spear head' for the NATO intervention in Libya secured third of Libya's oil production. So if it's not about oil and gas, was it really about the 'Responsibility to Protect' civilians from their dictator who wanted to kill 5,000 and they ended up killing over 60,000 of them?!


"9. The Arab dictatorships now overthrown or tottering were better for women than their likely Islamist successors. The postcolonial Arab states often pursued what my friend Deniz Kandiyoti of the School of Oriental and African Studies has called “state feminist” projects of female uplift. But because these policies were pursued by unpopular dictatorships, they created a male backlash. The Muslim Brotherhood’s patriarchal pushback against the upper class feminism of Suzanne Mubarak was a feature not of 2011 but of 1981-2010. The massive trend to veiling among Egyptian women took place in the past 20 years, not all of a sudden today. That is, “state feminism” often backfired because it was felt as intrusive and heavy-handed. Women’s progress was tainted, moreover, by association with hated dictatorships. Nor was Hosni Mubarak exactly Germaine Greer. Two of my Ph.D. students had their projects initially rejected by the Egyptian authorities because they included a focus on feminist issues, which were increasingly controversial in Mubarak’s dictatorship. If Tunisia and Egypt can now move to democratic systems, women will have new freedoms to organize politically and to make demands on the state. Nor can outsiders pre-define women’s issues. Their actual desires may be for social services, notably lacking under Mubarak and Ben Ali, rather than for the kinds of programs favored by the old elites. In any case, while women’s causes may face challenges from conservative Muslim forces, it is healthier for them to mobilize and debate in public than for faceless male bureaucrats to make high-handed decisions for women."


The first decision taken by the new Libyan ruler, who ironically was the justice minister under Gaddafi, his first decision when he 'celebrated the killing of Gaddafi' was to introduce Polygamy! and you can read this news article for some of such black fun. As for the Egyptian case you can read this article in The Stonegate Institute which we quote "There is no mistaking the Wahhabi foundation of the Nour Party's politics. Its male leaders and candidates affect the untrimmed beard cultivated by Wahhabis, in an alleged imitation of Muhammad. They claim to have a single real candidate: Muhammad. In an obvious mimicry of past Saudi-Wahhabi restrictions on women, the Nour Party relegated women candidates (whom Egyptian law required be included) to the bottom of their list to prevent any from being elected. The Nour Party's leader, Yasser Borhami, denounced participation by women in parliament as "corruption."" In Tunisia women might have a leverage over the other countries because the former president was more liberal to the extent that he prohibited any head scarf for women years before some European countries introduced the Burqa Ban covering only the face!!


"10. The Arab upheavals are an unmitigated disaster for Israel. This position has been argued by Netanyahu and others. While it is true that the Muslim religious parties coming to power in Tunisia and Egypt are more sympathetic to the Palestinians than were Ben Ali and Mubarak, the issue is more complex than that. The Syrian National Council that is opposing the Baath Party in Syria has said that it will cease supporting Hizbullah and Hamas if it comes to power. The National Transitional Council in Libya is not anti-Israel. Moreover, you cannot gauge whether the changes are good or bad for Israel only by whether they might affect Israeli policy toward Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. Dictatorships such as that of Mubarak were politically pathological, pursuing policies advantageous to the Israeli Right wing that were deeply unpopular with the Egyptian people. A democratic Egypt that actually represented public opinion would not necessarily be militant (no Egyptians want a return to a war footing), but it would be honest in its dealings with Tel Aviv. Israel has not been benefited by its denial of statehood to the Palestinians, by Mubarak’s corrupt collaboration in right wing policies, nor by the Syrian Baath Party’s cynical deployment of Palestine as a domestic issue. In a politically healthy Middle East, when Israel steals Palestinian land and water, it would get regional push back of a political and economic nature (as has finally started happening with regard to Turkey). That isn’t apocalyptic, it is politics. What has been wrong with Israel’s relationship with its Middle Eastern neighbors has been a lack of politics in favor of bribed sycophancy or ginned-up militancy, which has bred terrorism on the one side and arrogant hawkishness on the other. The changes in the Arab world, if they lead to more democracy, could well normalize Israel and Palestine in the region. It wouldn’t be the end of disputes, but it might be the beginning of the end of pathological politics."


This point by itself contradicts point number 3 as we explained above but if we think of the 'Arab Spring' as a product of NATO and US think tanks as we also explained above, this might be the only 'Myth' among the 10 the author mentioned, and it's exactly why the public and the majorities of Arabs were and still opposing the 'Arab Spring' and that's why we see it failing in Syria as we saw it failing in Iran where the stance against israel is very high because of the latter's continuous crimes and aggressive behavior towards the states in the region, its apartheid policies towards the Palestinians and its possession and development of weapons of mass destruction and mainly the nuclear ones.


We're sorry to point out that 9 out of 10 'myths' of the 'Arab Spring' the author tried to market were actually facts he tried to conceal in a method of taking over the minds of less informed readers who consists of the masses in the west in order to get their support towards completing the plan of controlling a region with rich resources and in the interest of israel only even if that would be at the cost of US & European citizens by using their tax money to commit crimes in their names and create enemies for their children.


Fortunately, the plot failing in Syria will have a huge counter effect and would correct all mistakes that the 'Arab Spring' has committed and to pass the same Spring onto those who invented it. We refer you to our post Is Obama Regime Next? for a future insight on how the USA is going to collapse into few states or blocs of states in the same way the USSR has collapsed, and how the EU will cease to exist as it is and hopefully such huge events will have less effect on the global scene than its real face value is.

Turkey - Mission Impossible in Syria

Turkey up to its ears in killing Syrians, over 40 Turkish officers arrested inside Syria were among a big group of terrorists imported from Libya recently. News leaked that some negotiations are being conducted to exchange them with terrorists based in Turkey like the case with Hussain Harmoush a runaway officer who was handed to Syria in exchange with 2 Turkish officers arrested in Syria.

Turkish officials gone mad because all their efforts in removing Syrian president failed miserably, they used and trying to use all their cards starting with training terrorists, facilitating their movements, supplying logistics, weapons and finance, to threatening with sanctions to literally shouting threats in media, trying to push Kurdish ethnic minorities inside Syria to riot.. all in vain, on the contrary, all of their efforts back-lashed against Turkey itself with more harm than ever thought.

For that Turkish Muslim Brotherhood (a terrorist organization based on extreme transliteration of Islam) govt, put all their odds with the removing of Syrian president, if they eventually fail, and most likely they're going to, they are out of the political life in the area and might have consequences throughout the countries that the USA had led changes in and installed Muslim Brotherhood puppet govts in (Libya, Tunisia, Egypt [still trying though they won a majority n Parliamentary elections with a more extreme movement Salafists..) and the tremor most likely wouldn't stop there.

As soon as Turkish officials slapped economic sanctions against Syria, the latter retaliated with using Turkey's face as a training bag for slapping sanctions hitting Turkish economy very hard that added insult to the injury for Turkish PM & his team. Syria cancelled a free trade agreement signed in 2004, applied customs tax on Turkish imported good up to 30%, transit fees reinstated against Turkish trucks transporting Turkish goods to most of the Arab countries, esp in Lebanon, Jordan and the Gulf countries.

Turkish officials tried to play down the effects of sanctions by talking about alternate routes for its trucks but the fact is now they have only 2 other options, first through Iraqi's dangerous hostile Kurdish territories adding also 5 days at least in roads, or through sea adding more days and both ways adding high costs.

No alternative for Turkish existing extremist govt except removing Syria's Assad even if they have to go on suicide missions inside Syria, personally! The role given to Turkey by NATO and it accepted thinking it will be resurrecting the dead Ottoman Empire was much bigger than its capabilities, a dream that will become a nightmare soon; therefore, it's Mission Impossible. 


Note: It's worth mentioning that the measures taken by Syria against Turkey are far beyond what Turkish govt expected especially the cancellation of the Free Trade Agreement signed in 2004, yet we see most media allied with NATO covers the issue as Turkey was the one to cancel the agreement. This link to a Turkish prominent newspaper is a conclusive evidence that Syria cancelled the agreement before 5 days of Turkish announcement of cancelling the same agreement, which falls in line with most of the media-misconception reporting Syrian events: 
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/Default.aspx?PageID=238&nID=8385&NewsCatID=338

باحث ياباني يحذر من أخطار مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة

البروفيسور ن. ج باحث وعالم ياباني في علم الاجتماع والسلوك البشري في دراسة حديثة له من ٣٥٤ صفحة قطع متوسط يحذر من مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة. 

الباحث يتكلم بشكل عام عن قنوات الإعلام الموجه والغريب تركيزه على قناة الجزيرة حيث تدعي أنها قناة الرأي والرأي الآخر! 

الدراسة قيد الطباعة وسنحاول توضيح بعض ما جاء فيها حسب الناشطين الذين عملوا مع البروفيسور ن ج. وما سمح باستخدامه.

لمتابعة قناة الجزيرة دون سواها عدة مخاطر سواء كانت نفسية، اجتماعية وحتى صحية وعملية بناء الرأي هي أبعد ما تكون عن سياسة القائمين على القناة فهم لا يعمدون لطريقة تؤدي إلى بناء رأي للمشاهد طبقاً للمعطيات التي تقدمها القناة الإخبارية، إنما على العكس تماماً فهي توجه المشاهد لتلقي جرعات المعلومات والمعطيات التي تصب بمطلقها باتجاه واحد فتتحول قناة الجزيرة ومَن على شاكلتها من محطة أخبارية إلى محطة إخبارية يعني من نقل الأخبار إلى إخبار الأخبار، والفرق بينهما كما يقول البروفيسور ن ج كبير جداً حيث يضيف: 

محطات الأخبار مهمتها نقل الأحداث وصياغتها بطريقة خبرية تترك للمشاهد بناء رأيه الخاص ومن ثم الحكم، أما المحطة الإخبارية فتقوم باجتزاء الخبر أو إضافة أجزاء إضافية معدة مسبقاً إما للتشكيك براوي الخبر أو إعادة الصياغة وهذا يبطل عمل الدماغ التحليلي حيث يعطي المشاهد المتلقي المعلومة جاهزة كما تريدها المحطة وليس كما حدثت!

يضيف البروفيسور ن ج والذي راقب قناة الجزيرة منذ العام ٢٠٠٣ أنها تقوم الآن بقطف ما زرعته خلال الفترة الماضية من ترسيخ لمصداقيتها عند الجمهور الأوسع وعدم اكتراثها بالنخب حيث كانت تخاطب العامة عن طريق دغدغة المشاعر العاطفية والغرائز القبلية والمجتمعية وحتى الدينية من خلال برامج إثارية وابتعادها بشكل مطلق عن برامج تحليلية أو وثائقية.

استطاعت قناة الجزيرة بذلك زيادة نسبة مشاهديها من العامة على حساب الخاصة ليتم استخدامهم فيما بعد عند الحاجة لهم كما أثبتت الأحداث الأخيرة في بعض دول منطقة الشرق الأوسط وشمال إفريقية.

الغباء الاجتماعي: 

إن قيام قناة الجزيرة بعرض الخبر والتحليل والاستنتاج أدت لاعتماد المشاهدين عليها بدلاً من التحليل الذاتي للمعلومات، حيث يشاهد المتلقي الخبر على شكل شريط عاجل في وسط الشاشة وبطريقة مثيرة ثم يعاد عدة مرات في شريط الأخبار المتحرك ثم يقوم المذيع بقراءة الخبر ومحاورة أحد المختصين الذين يعطون التحليل والاستنتاج جاهزاً للمتلقي، وعبر ترسيخ هذه الظاهرة لعدة سنوات لم يعد المتلقي بحاجة سوى أن يتابع المحطة لمدة أطول حتى يحصل على التحليل من قبل الخبراء ما يؤدي إلى استغناؤه تدريجياً عن ميزة التحليل المنطقي والذاتي للأحداث ليصل بالنهاية لمرحلة خطيرة في أموره الحياتية اليومية والتعامل مع الآخرين بحيث ينتظر فيها أي شخص يدعي أنه خبير ليعطيه الحل المناسب للمعطى الذي يواجهه، فيسيء التصرف ورد الفعل مقارنة بمن لم يعتمد على أحد آخر ليفكر عنه. 

متابعة قناة الجزيرة تسبب البدانة: 

في دراسته قيّم البروفيسور ن. ج بسؤال 3500 شخص مناصفة بين ذكر وأنثى حول أوزانهم كل شهر اعتباراً من شهر شباط ولغاية أول شهر أيلول وبمقارنة ساعات مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة توصل لنتيجة خطيرة وغريبة: كل ساعة مشاهدة لقناة الجزيرة أسبوعياً تزيد من وزن الرجل 1 كلغ شهرياً ووزن كل امرأة 1.3 كلغ شهرياً وتتناسب طرداً بنسب أقل كلما زادت ساعات المشاهدة لتصل إلى 3 كلغ زيادة للرجل كل شهر و 4.6 كلغ زيادة للمرأة في حال كانت المشاهدة لمدة ساعتين يومياً..!

يرجع البروفيسور ن. ج هذه الزيادة لسبب ارتياح دماغ المشاهد من التحليل واتجاهه للخمول والتسليم بما يشاهد ويتلقى من المحللين والخبراء الذين تحضرهم الجزيرة بالإضافة إلى تنويهه أن الجزيرة تعتمد سياسة خطيرة من حيث توزيع أوقات البرامج الإثارية وأوقات إعادتها حيث لا تتم إلا في أوقات متأخرة بالنسبة للمنطقة العربية فيضطر المشاهد للجلوس أمام الشاشة في أوقات قيلولته أو بعد وقت العشاء بدل ممارسة أي نشاط يحتوي رياضة ولو كان مشياً أو التفكير..!

ازدياد العدائية:

لاحظ البروفيسور ن. ج أن العدوانية أو العدائية قد زادت بشكل ملحوظ لدى مشاهدي قناة الجزيرة وتتناسب طرداً بعدد ساعات المشاهدة الأسبوعية حيث تزداد العدائية بشكل خطير عندما يشكك أحد ما بخبر ورد على قناة الجزيرة وربط الباحث الياباني ما قامت به قناة تلفزيونية سورية (قناة الدنيا) بضرب مصداقية الجزيرة بشكل كبير بازدياد حوادث عنفية لدى مدمني مشاهدة الجزيرة في محيطهم العائلي أو في محيط العمل.

في نهاية البحث ينصح البروفيسور ن. ج بالتالي لمعالجة عوارض مشاهدة قناة الجزيرة:

1) محاولة الابتعاد قدر الإمكان عن المشاهدة أو على الأقل تقليل ساعات المشاهدة الأسبوعية وألا تزيد عن ساعتين إجماليتين أسبوعياً.

2) محاولة اجتناب البرامج الإثارية والتي تحاكي الغرائز الدينية أو الطائفية أو العرقية أو المناطقية قدر الإمكان لأنها الأخطر حسب وصف الباحث الياباني.

3) إذا كان المشاهد أعزب فهو بالتأكيد ليس لديه أي علاقة زمالة أو صداقة مع الجنس الآخر بسبب عدوانيته فلذا الأفضل زيارة الأقارب والأصدقاء بحيث يكون المجتمعون خليطاً من الجنسين.

4) إذا كان المشاهد متزوجاً فالأفضل وللحفاظ على العلاقة الزوجية أخذ إجازة من العمل والسفر بسياحة داخلية أو خارجية قدر الإمكان.

5) لمن يضطر لمشاهدة قناة الجزيرة أو القنوات التي على شاكلتها من محللين إخباريين أو مراقبين أو صحفيين فعليهم مشاهدة القناة بطريقة تحليلية حيث يقوم بكتابة الأخبار ومراجعتها لاحقاً.

6) على المشاهدين لقناة الجزيرة المشاهدة بطريقة تشكيكية لكافة الأخبار حيث يقوم المشاهد بتكذيب الخبر قبل المشاهدة أي تحضير الدماغ لتلقي الخبر حتى ولو كان صحيحاً ثم مقاربته للواقع.

7) المشاهدة الصباحية أفضل من المشاهدة في أوقات القيلولة وقبل النوم حيث تكون الجملة العصبية متنبهة وحاضرة للتحليل.

8) شرب أي نوع منبهات طبيعية قبل المشاهدة بمدة لا تقل عن 10 دقائق ولا تزيد عن نصف ساعة كالشاي أو القهوة مثلاً.

كما ذكرنا سابقاً ما ورد أعلاه هو فقط ملخص سمح البروفيسور الياباني ن. ج بنقله عن طريق بعض الناشطين الذين ساعدوه في دراسته سيتم نشر كامل الدراسة فور انتهاء مراجعتها مع طلاب البروفيسور من الدراسات العليا حيث أنها مشروع تخرج لعدد من دارسي الإعلام الاجتماعي والنفسي.

نتمنى لمشاهدي قناة الجزيرة الشفاء العاجل