So apparently, NATO member states, especially the main ones, do not like other superpowers to install or plot to install puppet regimes in other countries, even if that will come by a popular demand without a military invasion!
How hypocrite is that?
But The hypocrisy is not what the western mainstream media is concerned about, do you remember what they called the uniqueness of the laws only applicable for the USA? The American Exceptionalism, to help preserve the 'exceptionalism' of the American (the USA only), Britain, better known as the US lapdog, spews its hypocrisy on the US's behalf.
Let's take a couple of examples of the hypocrisy of NATO, especially of the USA and its lapdog Britain:
In April 2003, most of my critics here were not born yet or do not remember that era, the USA formed the so-called 'Coalition of the Willing' and invaded Iraq, toppled and killed its president, destroyed the country's infrastructure, segregated it into sectarian and ethnic parts (Kurds in the north, Sunnis in the central regions, and Shia in the south), dissolved the Iraqi army, wrote, yes the USA and Britain wrote Iraq's constitution, and in the process killed and maimed well over a million people including half a million children ('The price is worth it' - Albright), displaced 4 million others, all of that was based on a first lie that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction, and when the UN inspectors failed to find anything where the US officials pointed to, the warmongers said they're invading Iraq because of the September 11 attacks which were carried out by 19 individuals 11 of them were Saudis so they invaded Iraq!
Prior to the invasion of Iraq, the USA not only helped dissolve the USSR, they 'installed' the first Russian President Yeltsin, and the same mainstream media celebrated installing their man in the Kremlin! Compare that with the hysterical baseless accusations of the Russian interference in the US elections, proved totally false.
Let's bring you closer to our days, in 2011 and after the Libyan leader helped the French President Sarkozy in his elections based on promises to forge better relations with Europe and after he gave up his arsenal of chemical weapons which was used as a deterrent against foreign intervention, Sarkozy, along with Cameron of Britain and Obama of the USA invaded and destroyed Libya, killed its leader Gaddafi, stole its resources and the hundreds of billions of dollars of the Libyan's money, and refuse to leave the country even after splitting it into halves and installing their puppet anti-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood regime in Tripoli! By the way, also based on lies.
In the same year of killing Gaddafi, the US 'intelligence' agencies along with their other NATO and Gulfies stooges were actively working to destroy Syria, invade it with tens of thousands of terrorists from all sides of the planet, killed and continue to kill hundreds of thousands of its people, displace millions of others mostly internally, steal its oil and wheat, refuse to leave because 'mission is not yet successful' as they couldn't yet kill its leader, Assad. Yeah, and also based on lies and continue to lie about Syria.
Are the above examples of US, British, French, Turkish, and other NATO members worked, working, and plotting, not only planning, to install puppet regimes in other countries enough? You can find further others like Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Panama, Serbia, UKRAINE, YEMEN, Sudan, Tunisia, Egypt, IRAN.. to count a few, and all based on lies.
So, what is upsetting Britain today? Russia is attempting to install a Russian puppet president who the Russians are plotting for him to come by popular demand who would be very much acceptable than the current neo-Nazi regime installed by NATO back in 2014 after ousting the legitimate president of that country.
One can only wonder: are the peoples of NATO member states that ignorant they cannot see the lies and hypocrisies of their regimes to defend those policies and hypocrisies or more plausible: do they fully agree with these hypocrisies and the war crimes resulting from them against people of other countries who never harmed them? Let that sink in.
NATO is anything but a defense pact of peace-loving countries, at least its history does NOT support this claim, neither does its present acts, nor its future plans from what is already made public.
https://twitter.com/3arabiSouri/status/1485177858326921216
----
Your objective comments are always welcome.
No comments:
Post a Comment