The Ultimate US Double Standards: Taliban and Other Countries

It takes no genius to realize the vile, sinister, and often costly double standards the USA, its propaganda outlets, and its EU minions and other proxies, this is one small example.

First of all, I'm no fan of the Taliban, they do not represent the true Islam, they drifted to the extreme versions of it under influence of extremists funded by the Saudis, the US allies and the largest buyers of US weapons by far.

The nomination raised the prospect that the Taliban — the violent, extremist Islamic movement that retook power last month as the American-backed government collapsed — would occupy an ambassador’s seat at the United Nations.
The New York Times

The Pentagon's propaganda outlet, aka the New York Times, seems to be worried about the ambassador to the United Nations of the former US-backed government in Afghanistan, the government that its own president fled the country with about 65 million dollars in cash as some reported and the government that is no longer in existence, not in any single ministry in the country.

This would have really been a moral issue for the USA except for the following reasons:

1. The Taliban is a US byproduct in Afghanistan.
2. The Taliban have been negotiating power take-over for months with the USA itself.
3. The Taliban not only came to power with the help of the USA, they were also armed by the USA when the latter left them all sorts of weapons and munition to play with.
4. The USA has done exactly what the Taliban is trying to do now in every country it toppled its legitimate government or still trying to topple its government, Gaddafi was still in the Libyan capital when the US paid millions to his ambassador to the United Nations to flip against him and declared him as the only representative of Libya, the same with Yemen, and tried to pull this with Syria and only managed to get it done in the Arab League where Al Qaeda representatives occupied Syria's seat for one summit and then no more.

For the Pentagon to be concerned, through its propaganda outlet, of the Taliban appointing an ambassador for themselves after taking full power in Afghanistan, this is beyond ridiculous, it's disgusting, to say the least.

After 20 years of unjustified illegal invasion and occupation of Afghanistan tainted with massacre after the other and the last was as the US was pulling out slaughtering 7 children and 3 innocent adults, the USA, its officials, and its media should never open their mouths about what is going on or will happen in Afghanistan, the only time they can say something is how much they regret the war crimes they committed in that country, and how much they are planning to pay the Afghani people in compensations? Other than that please USA STFU while your empire sees its final days.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

Western Mainstream Media Propaganda at its Best - Russian Opposition 'Leader'!

 

Russian opposition leader? Based on what exactly? The number of YouTube views which might be mainly by viewers in the west including the same mainstream media journalists trying to hype his story up?

If Navalny is the leader of the Russian opposition and he could barely get less than 1% on his side, Putin is very lucky.

https://twitter.com/3arabiSouri/status/1350872250988302337

But to be frank, this is not out of style for the western MSM, look at other places: In Syria for example, they tried to prop up some figures as Syrian opposition leaders to drop them very fast when they discovered most of them were linked to Al Qaeda, then they tried to find some from the opposition figures abroad and they couldn't come up with a single individual who claims he has support among the Syrian people or can stand any chance against the Syrian President Assad in any elections who enjoys the support of at least 16 million Syrians inside Syria not to mention people like myself abroad and we're the majority among the Syrians just look at the last elections in Lebanon how 400,000 Syrian refugees voted for Assad because unlike what the western MSM feeds you these people fled the terrorists not the government; the western MSM couldn't even get the support of the people under the occupation of Al Qaeda in regions they claim they have support in.

In Venezuela, it gets much clearer with the US and its European puppets trying to make a president out of Guaido who had quite good support inside his country and managed to snap the seat of the parliament speaker but lost most of that support when he tried to carry out a bloody coup, several times and was helping foreign countries starve his own people, where is he today?

And this applies to their attempts in every country they targeted to 'export their surplus of democracy', especially the surplus of the US democracy (US democracy LOL), but they don't have any issues with countries that do not oppose them and which they can 'milk' like what Trump used to say about the Saudi king, for instance. Where's their support for the Saudi opposition? There are no Saudi opposition figures? Qatari? Ukrainian? Sudanese after they accepted to establish ties with Israel? No opposition? Not a single one? Despite the mass beheadings in Saudi and the prolonged prison sentences in Bahrain and Qatar, and the unrest in Sudan?

Navalny knew he will be arrested upon arrival as there's a criminal case against him, who sent him knew he will be arrested, but that's exactly what was needed, building the Russian NordStream2 gas pipelines supply to Germany is resumed and in its final stage and the US wants to sell Germany its much more expensive shale gas, what's better than using this 'Russian opposition leader' to get a new round of sanctions against Russia, the country of 146 million people who do not agree nor support Navalny and who were harmed by western sanctions which also harmed thousands of farmers in the European Union itself, btw, but who cares about those, 'let's export the surplus of our democracy to Russia'.

I'm not Russian and I don't even speak the Russian language and surely the Russians can address this farce far better than me and they're doing so but not on western mainstream propaganda outlets, on the platforms that matter which are followed by their people not western people, it's the western hypocrisy which killed and harmed and continue to kill and harm millions of my people that I'm highlighting.

Why Is This Even a Story: Russians Allegedly Paid Afghans to Kill US Soldiers?

The New York Times is pushing this story, denied by Trump and his war ministry the Pentagon and his ‘intelligence’ services publicly, that Russia is running a plot paying bounties to Afghan recruits of Taliban and others to kill US troops in Afghanistan.

What were the Afghan Taliban and most of the Afghan fighters doing all the past 19 years exactly? Maybe distributing flowers to the US occupation troops who were giving them chocolate in return!

The New York Times Breaking News on an alleged Russian bounty to Afghan fighters to kill US troops.
This comes after Trump made some vague announcement on troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.

That’s one side, what if Russia actually paid Afghan fighters to kill US soldiers? What’s wrong with that? Didn’t the US overtly arm the same Afghan fighters to kill Soviet troops in Afghanistan including with surface to air missiles paid for by the Saudis and the US taxpayers to shoot down Soviet planes and copters killing Russians?! Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/why-is-this-even-a-story-russians-allegedly-paid-afghans-to-kill-us-soldiers/

To help us continue please visit the Donate page to donate or learn how you can help us with no cost on you.
Follow us on Telegram: http://t.me/syupdates link will open Telegram app.

‘Syrian Civil War’: British Terrorists, US Troops, and Western Hostages!

Syrian Civil War, for more than 8.5 years the Western pundits paint the crisis in Syria as a civil war, really? See how it could be anything else except a civil war.

A Civil War is ‘a war between citizens of the same country.’ Google’s Dictionary says.

Wikipedia puts it like this: ‘A civil war, also known as an intrastate war in polemology, is a war between organized groups within the same state or country.’

Merriam Webster defines ‘Civil War’ as: “A war between opposing... Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/syrian-civil-war-british-terrorists-us-troops/

---

Sponsored Ad

Start with US$ 100 account and make more than US$ 1 each day, 

Click Here to Learn More