Syria’s First Family Visits Al-Souda Church in Tartous

Syrian President Dr. Bashar al-Assad, Syria's First Lady Mrs. Asmaa al-Assad and their children Hafez, Zein and Kareem paid a visit to a small town in northwest Syria to greet its people on Christmas.

Yes, the town they visited, like most of Syria, is a mixed of all religions, the mosaic of Syria, and it's not out of custom for the Syrian president to greet all Syrians on their occasions.

The people were more than happy, their joy cannot be hidden in the videos taken there.

More in this video report: Syria’s First Family Visits Al-Souda Church in Tartous

First Lady Asma Al-Assad Visits Pediatric Cancer Center on Eid Al-Adha

Syria's First Lady Asma'a Al-Assad visits pediatric cancer center on the first day of Eid l-Adha.

Syria’s First Lady Mrs. Asma Al-Assad visited children in the cancer ward of Beroni Hospital, on this first day of blessed Eid Al-Adha.  The First Lady visited the children with members of the Basma Association, the Syrian-based organization which helps provide physiological, medical, and financial support to these children and their parents. This work is especially important during this ongoing period of illicit sanctions against the Syrian Arab Republic.

Mrs. Asma Al-Assad brings balloons to children being treated for cancer.

“Basma” is Arabic for “smile,” and First Lady Asma’a Al-Assad brought many... Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/asma-al-assad-visits-cancer-center/

Syria’s First Lady Asmaa Assad Begins Treatment for Breast Tumor

The media office at the Syrian Presidency announced on Wednesday that Mrs. Asmaa al-Assad began the initial stage of treatment of a malignant breast tumor which was discovered in its early stage.

“Strongly, confidently and faithfully, Mrs. Asmaa al-Assad started the first stage of treatment of a malignant tumor in the breast which was discovered in its early stage,” the office.... Continue reading: https://www.syrianews.cc/syrias-first-lady-begins-treatment-for-breast-tumor/

Syria's First Lady's Shoes and The New World Order

Feeling Boiling with Syria's First Lady's Louboutin Shoes?

Media aligned with NATO worked hard over the past 15 months plus to come up with any piece of information that would harm the Syrian state by any way, whether that is at the political, community, security, military, officials personal level or any level they can tangle the feelings of the Sheeple and direct them in the propaganda war they waged against this country, not for anything else except this small Middle Eastern state dared tell the United States of America NO in its face. Not only saying NO to the super power when it was in its heights of ego, but dared working hard to fail any US hegemony plans in the region, if not affecting the worldwide New World Order altogether.

Can you imagine that in part of the ongoing planning and plotting to make happen the criminal thought of a one government world that would rule the entire human race under the guise of using slogans that totally are opposite to this daemonic goal, slogans like: Spreading Democracy, Promoting Free Speech and Securing Human Rights; can you imagine that the Syrian first lady's 'shoes' were part of their master plan?!

Don't be surprised, we as Syrians have witnessed all kinds of low propaganda from targeting all our national symbols from our flag in an attempt to replace it with another one, to targeting the Syrian map by showing maps with divided ethnic based tiny states, targeting the Syrian army by having terrorists posing in its uniform  and committing crimes to frame it in unverifiable youtube video clips, all other low propaganda that targeted the head of the Syrian state with all his family members, not ending with his wife of course, even her shoes.

An article dated Monday 19 March 2012, the Guardian appeared with an interesting, disconnected, totally out of touch article titled: Is Christian Louboutin toast now that we know his overpriced shoes are the favourite footwear of Asma al-Assad?

Based on the funny story of fake Syrian president's personal emails leaked and out of discoveries of western intelligence agencies combined their efforts to discover the shopping habits of the Syrian first lady from again her personal emails. We won't discuss the email story itself because having it hosted at a small commercial hosting company in Dubai while the Syrian presidential palace has its own servers and the Syrian Information Society, a public corporation owned by the Syrian government and headed once by the Syrian president himself, can offer much more secure and realistic option to host the Syrian first family's personal emails.. But what we will discuss is the craze of the yellow western media to serve the only goal: demonize the Syrian state's head in order to fail the state to further destroy it, install puppet regimes in place to serve the ultimate goal: New World Order.

In the Guardian article mentioned above there's a cheap way in demonizing the Syrian first family by trying to imply to the readers that an owner of a VIP brand worldwide would have 'his career ended' just because one of its pair of shoes was bought by the Syrian first lady! Just in case Asma Al Assad did buy that pair of shoes from this brand.

Go through the article and sense the ugly language of one of the UK's dirtiest newspapers known for its pro-NATO wars. 

Now keep in mind that the UK is not having its very best economical times, and the Queen is supporting an austerity measures.

If however you did get appalled by the 'crime' the Syrian first lady committed in buying a pair of shoes, again if this story had any bases, maybe you should read the following article, where it's not a problem that the UK's crown prince's son's wife that she buys from an expensive brand a dress from Alexander McQueen worth £1,195, it's the problem that Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton has wore a dress that was wore before by another celebrity, Kim Kardashian in New York last year.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/kate-middleton-copies-kim-kardashian-861201

Are you boiling?

* They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, it's because you're 'Foolable'

Syria's First Lady in a 'Rare' Public Statement, How Rare?

Huffington Post posted an article titled: Asma Assad, Wife Of Bashar Assad, Speaks Out, as if she didn't speak before and then clearly indicates that this is a 'Rare Public Statement', we will see how rare and why NATO mass media is twisting facts in a comment we posted to the same article online and we quote here:

No clue from where you get your news, but I think the Syrian first lady appeared in public during the past 11 months in Syria much more than the US first lady since her husband took office in the USA, as a start.. Maybe not a press interview or an email to a newspaper, but how many first ladies do such a thing?

As for the 'poor timing', all timings are poor if you like or rich if you want, depends on your personal opinion which doesn't matter during war times.

Shelling of Homs is being a fact in NATO and allies media like yourselves, but by whom? You directly state that it was by government forces, I'd very much would like to see your evidence and how you reached to that conclusion when there's as all your media say: Defection in the Syrian Army, so it means that defected soldiers wearing government uniforms using artillery and tanks they took with them when defecting! so it's more likely that they might be those shelling the city and since you can't prove it I wonder how you state it as a fact?! 

War propaganda is a very sophisticated psychological science and especially when you are targeting people of the oldest civilization who taught the world how to write the alphabet, I was expecting much more hard work by you when warmongering so you don't expose yourselves so obviously, look again at the article above and look right beneath it to the picture of the 1st lady appearing in public and listening to her husband's speech in public less than 1 month before this date! 

Your strategy might still work with masses who believed that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction WMDs back in 2003 to justify the invasion and destruction of Iraq and slaughtering over a million Iraqi in order to spread 'democracy' there, the same 'democracy' your OWS 'Occupy Wall Street' movement much needs; or the fantasy of 11 cavemen planning in a Tora Bora cave how to take down two major towers in thousands of miles away avoiding all defence technology the world's number one superpower has and succeeding in taking the two towers down! Not only that, a third tower decides to go down in solidarity with its mates! just to again justify the invasion, destruction of Afghanistan and slaughtering of thousands of Afghani civilians in order to spread 'democracy' in their tribal country; or the undoubted mass media information that Gaddafi, the former ruler of Libya was 'planning' to kill 5,000 civilians in Benghazi so you decided to save them from Gaddafi so you can get to kill them along with over a 125,000 more to justify the invasion and destruction of Libya and get your hands on its vast reserves of oil and gas. Not to mention Somalia and the famine there caused because of the USA siege on the country and inciting conflicts between warlords there..

Yet, there you go again, but wait.. Why this time it's different? Why until now NATO hasn't moved in directly like it did elsewhere? Didn't all your media resemble Syria to Libya continuously? And now without any prior notice your media discovers Syria is not like Libya? If they tell you Syria is not rich with oil and gas like Libya, well that might be true, but there's countries who volunteered to cover the cost, so why didn't NATO interfere in Syria? There's only one reason: the potential danger on israel, and israel is what moves US politicians who mentions it continuously with every speech especially during election times. There's an imminent danger on israel should Syria be directly attacked by NATO, Syria's army is still intact, it even carried out huge drills a couple of months ago, it has missiles that one of them was tested and launched from a Syrian location and landed in Iranian desert with the Iranian cooperation hitting its presumed target with a 100% accuracy which US 'smart bombs' doesn't have. So why messing with Syria directly? Let's tell the public opinion that the president there is 'killing his own people', 'shelling peaceful protesters' by tanks, and use this new 'lie' to justify 'supporting the aspiration of Syrians by all means' to 'topple their own regime' without having to deal with a regional war.

"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me"; how about keep fooling me? Isn't it because you are so 'foolable'?!