Thursday, November 1, 2012

Misleading Media on Syria - Shaping Public Opinion - 7

Under the title: Misleading Media on Syria - Shaping Public Opinion, I aim to post a few examples of how the NATO aligned mainstream media is used to systematically shape public opinion by fabricating, misleading, dis-informing and deliberately manipulating in order to further the goal of theirs paymasters.

I endeavor to show irrefutable evidence of incidents that occurred while the NATO media was playing a huge role in demonizing the Syrian state, its army, its police & security forces, even normal people who just didn't support the NATO imposed 'spontaneous public uprising' on them. These examples, aired by media channels based inside Syria, have caused these channels to be banned by the same parties preaching Syrians 'democracy' & 'free speech'. On December 05, 2011 the European Union ministers of foreign affairs convened to come up with a decision that will stain their foreign policy & label them hypocrites forever. They decided to ban a number of Syrian based channels, namely Addounia  the privately owned satellite channel, Champress a privately owned website & Al Watan Newspaper a privately owned newspaper. And not surprisingly the Arab League, (a formation representing the governments of the Arab World, with the exception of Syria) issued an order on September 05, 2012 to 2 satellite management companies, Nilesat & Arabsat, sponsored by the League, to take down Syrian State satellite TV, Syria News another state owned satellite channel & Addounia TV the privately owned channel from air, for no publicly stated logical reason. But perhaps this is the real reason:


Exhibit no. 7: Public opinion VS Imperialists 
FSA Fighting Israel or For Israel? 

There's not a single time an opposition figure supporting the 'revolution' imposed on Syrians by the NATO organization and not keep on repeating the same sick lie, among the other lies: 'They're fighting the Assad's regime because it didn't fire a bullet against israel to retrieve the Golan Heights'. Why the Syrian state didn't launch a war directly against israel to retrieve the Golan Heights since the October 1973 war we discussed in our previous post: Why Didn't Syrian Army Attack israel Since 1973 War? Although huge battles were fought between the Syrian Army and both israel & the US in Lebanon, however, the NATO agents built their entire revolution on fake purposes to justify destroying the country, one of their lies exposed by the above clip aired by their own friends in the israeli media where one of their leaders Abdallah Tamimi speaks out frankly about themselves. Let's add the loads of israeli made weapons the Syrian authorities are confiscating after raiding FSA hideouts and headquarters throughout the country. Not to ignore the fact that their main supporters are non else than NATO member states especially USA, UK, Turkey and France the biggest supporters of israel and the backers of the Zionist regime there..! So are the FSA (aka Al Qaeda) fighting the Syrian 'regime' because it didn't fight israel or they're fighting it so there would be nobody to fight or even pose a threat against this cancerous murderous entity in the region?
israeli made shells confiscated by Syrian Army from an FSA depot
And if they are planning to remove the Syrian regime because it's stopping them from fighting israel, then why did they attack an advanced Syrian Army listening post near the Golan Heights? (video clip of it) Then why they are attacking Syrian Army ANTI-air defense barracks? To serve who exactly? They state they want to establish an Islamic Caliphate in the Islamic countries, obviously it'll be the one that would serve as a puppet in the hands of the international Zionism with their criminal aim to create a New World Order with a One World Government, ran by them, and everybody else would be a One World Citizen.. Read for yourself: Islamic Caliphate - Hizb uTahrir
They fool you, they keep fooling you & they enjoy fooling you, not because they're
smart, it's because you're foolable.

1 comment:

  1. Wait a second, don't the FSA get most of their weaponry from the SAA, whether from infiltrators or raids?

    ReplyDelete