Venezuela Suffering from Floods and Electricity Outages

A natural disaster striking Venezuela, heavy rains in the western regions caused strong flooding which resulted in devastation all across the regions affected with about 20,000 families losing their homes.

Massive outages in electricity, food, and water were reported, farmlands with their crops and cattle were swept away, and no help from abroad is offered.

On the contrary, this is a chance long-awaited by the USA and its allies to add further suffering to the people of Venezuela after stealing their gold and foreign reserves, and imposing an inhumane embargo on the country and especially its oil extraction and export, if it's not controlled by US and British corporations then it's not going to flow.

More in this report: Venezuela Floods: Massive Natural Disaster Displacing 20,000 Families.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

Yemen Army Bombs a Saudi Strategic Base Killing and Injuring 35 Saudi Officers

Can someone try to convince the Saudi decision-makers to stop their genocidal war on the poorest Arab country? Not for any moral reason, obviously, it won't work, tell them they are on the losing side already.

The latest bombing of the Suadi strategic 'Al Wajib' military base in Jizan with ballistic missiles fired by the Yemeni Army, the one with its headquarters in the Yemeni capital Sana, should be another wake-up slap, a hard one and not less powerful than the bombing of the Aramco oil fields which halved the Saudi economy, this would require someone with the least knowledge of military to explain it to them.

On Wednesday, the Yemeni army fired 5 ballistic missiles into the heavily defended Saudi military base targeting the base's headquarters during a meeting of its commanders, one of the missiles targeted the hangars of the Apache helicopters in the base, and the weapons depot, all targets were hit with accuracy and as a result, 35 Saudi officers were either killed or injured, effectively, they are all out of duty.

After 7 years of constant aggression by a large, now shrinking, coalition led by the Saudis, theoretically, with the US, UK, Israelis leading from the backseat, the Yemeni Army is delivering one severe blow after the other to the Saudis and their mercenaries, not only inside Yemen, which one would think the Saudis think these are collateral damages that can be discarded, but hitting directly into Saudi territories and Saudi strategic military and economic targets.

More about this latest development and the Saudis response in this report: Yemen Army Neutralizes 35 Saudi Officers in a Ballistic Missile Strike.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

British Forces 'Highly Likely' Killed in the Bombing of Al Tanf in Syria

British soldiers training an ISIS remnant group in the depth of the Syrian desert were among the casualties of the bombing a day earlier that targeted the US illegal military base, many reports confirmed.

On the night of the 13th of October, Israeli fighter jets fired missiles from over an illegal US military base on Syrian soil inside the Syrian Arab Republic on the joint borders with Jordan and Iraq, the US allowed the bombing from over their heads. The bombing killed and injured Syrian troops and their allied forces who are fighting ISIS remnants in the Syrian central desert area. The Syrian allied forces vowed to avenge.

On the night of the 20th of the month, 5 kamikaze drones loaded with bombs struck the US illegal military base in the Al Tanf area in the Syrian southeastern desert, there were grad missiles fired at the base simultaneously.

The Pentagon admitted its heavily barracked base was struck and said 'it reserves its right to retaliate', it also said 'there were no immediate reports of casualties' from this attack, the British war ministry remained silent.

1. The Pentagon is not known to tell the truth about anything, at all, from its own financial spending and missing trillions of dollars on the eve of 9/11, to mysterious missing weapons and munition, to its black ops, and not the least its casualties. Its British buddies are not better in this field, in the matter of fact, they master deception and lies.
2. 'No immediate reports of casualties' means there will be later on reports of casualties.
3. The Iranian bombing of the US largest military base Ain Asad in western Iraq early last year is an example of the Pentagon's lies. The US president said 'all is well, nobody hurt', we said up to 108 US and British troops were killed and wounded, the Pentagon was believed by the MSM and we were ridiculed, a few days later, reports started emerging of US soldiers having 'headaches' from the sounds of the explosions, and then the 'headaches' were so severe that some of them died.

Whatever the US officials try to lie, the main fact is: the US and the UK have no mandate to deploy troops in Syria, their invasion of Iraq allowed terrorist groups to emerge from areas near their bases there, their presence in Syria only help destabilize the country, their particular presence in the Al Tanf area protects an ISIS affiliate called 'Maghawir Thawra' and they're not denying it. The US Army spokesperson even confirmed they carried out a military drill with these terrorists!

We will never know the real number of the British casualties, and those of the US, in the US regime change wars across the globe, maybe 30 years later unless some whistleblowers are brave enough to reveal this and go into hiding from the US and British 'law systems'...!

More in this report: Elizabeth the 2nd Forces Highly Likely among the Casualties in Al Tanf Bombing.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

When a Comedian Helps Expose the BBC Lies

The BBC, the British public propaganda service to justify the wars carried out by the regime of Elizabeth the Second, have been lying about Syria for long, actually, since its inception, the BBC that is, bringing on opposition members of other countries to expose internal matters from time to time does not earn you credibility unless you are accepting to do so when you do so when a whistleblower in your country does the same against your regime's narrative, the BBC fails miserably on that, at least in all the crimes its employer has committed around the world.

We've been exposing the BBC lies on Syria since the early days of the US-led war of terror and war of attrition started against the Syrian people in March 2011, some of you know it as the so-called 'Arab Spring' - Syria Crisis.

The lies of the BBC, which are in the same line as all the Pentagon's propagandists in western mainstream media have reached levels of disgust that are beyond comprehending and it's costing the lives of tens of thousands of innocent people in Syria on a daily basis where many westerners think they're doing us Syrians good by helping the aggressors continue with their war crimes against us buying in the narratives of the likes of the:

1. BBC,
2. Washington Post,
3. New York Times,
4. this topped them all: CNN, et al.

Why the BBC now and what happened recently, well it's a report by the BBC itself saying that 'its reporting on the infamous gas attack in Douma in Syria, the chemical attack hoax, had some flaws in it' which means it was a lie and mostly a fabrication to justify the bombing of the Syrian people by then the USA, the UK, and France, another war crime added to their extensive list.

The above video by comedian Jimmy Dore brings in investigative journalist Aaron Maté talking about the BBC's confession to lying, or if you want: deviating from the truth, or 'having flaws in their reporting' with an added explanation by Aaron about the incident and the smear campaign he has endured to help us Syrians expose this hoax by the mainstream media propagandists.

In the USA, comedians have a good business mainly attacking the politicians from the other party of their employers in shows like The Daily Show by Comedy Central, The Late Show, Late Night... etc. Some of them do good reporting on the opposite political parties of their employers, and rarely one of them would do balanced truthful reporting when it's really needed.

----
Your objective comments are always welcome.

Were Those Who Resisted the US Occupation of Iraq Insurgents or Terrorists?

Does anybody have any doubt still that the USA and its UK minion invaded, destroyed, plundered, and occupied Iraq based on lies and without any legal base? If yes, please stop reading this post and turn on to your favorite mainstream media show.

If the US occupation of Iraq was illegal, and it was, then those who fought the illegal occupation were insurgents or terrorists? Western mainstream media confuse their audience sometimes calling them insurgents and at other times call them terrorists, why so?

A member of Quora, the wiki Q & A social media platform put up a question in this regard, I'm copying my answer to the question on Quora here to preserve it from the platform's heavy censorship, they instantly blurred the image below as 'sensitive', and also to share the answer with the readers of this platform, here's the question and my reply:

Q: If the factions fighting against the coalition during the Iraq war were considered an 'insurgency' why were they also labeled as 'terrorists'? Isn't an insurgency selective while terrorism is indiscriminate?

A: Western mainstream media mastered the art of propaganda, they use the terminology to serve their purpose, an example:

We had to do a special taxology listing with the different definitions to unconfuse our readers when comparing our posts with what they consume in western MSM: Moderate Rebels | Syria News.

By constantly bombarding their audience, we call Sheeple, with the same narrative around the clock and in a synchronized way across their large number of media platforms owned by 7 corporations only who happen to be all of the same agenda, they made their Sheeple think that those who fought the US invasion of Iraq in Iraq were sent by Syria and then came back to Syria because they’re terrorists and terrorism is indiscriminate, as you rightly said.

Syria overtly supported the Iraqi resistance against the US and UK occupation of Iraq, the USA and its UK partners in the crime created local terrorist groups and imported foreign terrorist groups to fight those fighting them.

All evidence on the ground and documented facts, confession of terrorists arrested, and declarations of former western officials and soldiers prove beyond any doubt that the USA and the UK used Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq to ignite a sectarian war between the major two sects of Islam in the country they occupied, the dream of Henry Kissinger: The 100 years war between Sunni and Shia Muslims.

Here’s a background: ISIS: The US Boogyman.

You can also take it from the horse’s mouth: 2 US secretary of states one confirming the USA created Al Qaeda in an official Congressional hearing and the other confirming in a leaked audio recording that the US used ISIS to threaten the Syrian President Bashar Assad into concession, he outsmarted them and invited Russia instead: The Pentagon Threatening to Revive ISIS.

To understand their techniques see how many times they rebranded Al Qaeda in Syria: Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda Levant, Al Qaeda in Syria and Iraq, Al Qaeda Nusra, Nusra Front (Jabhat Nusra), The Levantine (Jabha Shamiyeh) Front, HTS - Hayat Tahrir Sham (Levant Liberation Authority)… and for the most of the first 7 years of the US-led war of terror against Syria, they were considering them as part of the Free Syrian Army. If a massacre was exposed to be committed by the FSA then instantly they accuse the Al Qaeda Levant; if they could hide the culprits they’d accuse the Syrian Army with it even though the victims are families of the SAA personnel; if the massacre was not that heinous: not many children killed in it, they’ll call it a ‘battle by the FSA against the ‘Assad Forces’, and when only civilians can be clearly seen as the victims they’ll call them ‘Shabbeeha’ - thugs.

There’s not a single western mainstream media outlet that is not involved in this propaganda spanning from Reuters to the BBC going through all other publications and TV channels, you name it they were involved directly with mastery in the art of disguise. When there are no actors on the ground to carry out crimes to satisfy their news agenda, the ‘journalists’ themselves would carry out the act: When CNN Crew Blew Up the Oil Pipeline in Homs.

We have better terminology: Those who resist foreign occupation are ‘resistance groups’, they’re mainly locals with help from others; those who work for the foreign occupation or other foreign agents are ‘mercenary terrorists’; those who carry out terrorist attacks based on ideology or their radical belief, like the Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabis are ‘terrorists’. See, simple terms derived from the types of their own acts.

Don’t let the masters of propaganda machines deceive you.

End of my reply on Quora.

---

Your objective comments are always welcome.