Western Mainstream Media Propaganda at its Best - Russian Opposition 'Leader'!

 

Russian opposition leader? Based on what exactly? The number of YouTube views which might be mainly by viewers in the west including the same mainstream media journalists trying to hype his story up?

If Navalny is the leader of the Russian opposition and he could barely get less than 1% on his side, Putin is very lucky.

https://twitter.com/3arabiSouri/status/1350872250988302337

But to be frank, this is not out of style for the western MSM, look at other places: In Syria for example, they tried to prop up some figures as Syrian opposition leaders to drop them very fast when they discovered most of them were linked to Al Qaeda, then they tried to find some from the opposition figures abroad and they couldn't come up with a single individual who claims he has support among the Syrian people or can stand any chance against the Syrian President Assad in any elections who enjoys the support of at least 16 million Syrians inside Syria not to mention people like myself abroad and we're the majority among the Syrians just look at the last elections in Lebanon how 400,000 Syrian refugees voted for Assad because unlike what the western MSM feeds you these people fled the terrorists not the government; the western MSM couldn't even get the support of the people under the occupation of Al Qaeda in regions they claim they have support in.

In Venezuela, it gets much clearer with the US and its European puppets trying to make a president out of Guaido who had quite good support inside his country and managed to snap the seat of the parliament speaker but lost most of that support when he tried to carry out a bloody coup, several times and was helping foreign countries starve his own people, where is he today?

And this applies to their attempts in every country they targeted to 'export their surplus of democracy', especially the surplus of the US democracy (US democracy LOL), but they don't have any issues with countries that do not oppose them and which they can 'milk' like what Trump used to say about the Saudi king, for instance. Where's their support for the Saudi opposition? There are no Saudi opposition figures? Qatari? Ukrainian? Sudanese after they accepted to establish ties with Israel? No opposition? Not a single one? Despite the mass beheadings in Saudi and the prolonged prison sentences in Bahrain and Qatar, and the unrest in Sudan?

Navalny knew he will be arrested upon arrival as there's a criminal case against him, who sent him knew he will be arrested, but that's exactly what was needed, building the Russian NordStream2 gas pipelines supply to Germany is resumed and in its final stage and the US wants to sell Germany its much more expensive shale gas, what's better than using this 'Russian opposition leader' to get a new round of sanctions against Russia, the country of 146 million people who do not agree nor support Navalny and who were harmed by western sanctions which also harmed thousands of farmers in the European Union itself, btw, but who cares about those, 'let's export the surplus of our democracy to Russia'.

I'm not Russian and I don't even speak the Russian language and surely the Russians can address this farce far better than me and they're doing so but not on western mainstream propaganda outlets, on the platforms that matter which are followed by their people not western people, it's the western hypocrisy which killed and harmed and continue to kill and harm millions of my people that I'm highlighting.

A Syrian Opposition Abroad Is An Enemy to Syrians

Just a small reminder of one of the main reasons why Syrian Opposition figures abroad do not have any right to claim they care for the Syrian People:

If you live in the USA and before you receive the US citizenship you must take an oath in a special ceremony, the oath says: 

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."


Now, keep in mind that Syria is not a US ally, on the contrary, it's one of the US main foes especially when it comes to the Middle East region affairs, and we should remember the following important notes:


1) US then Undersecretary of State (don't know what he was doing under her though!) then John Bolton gave a speech on May 6, 2002 entitled "Beyond the Axis of Evil" and included Syria in that axis, and it wasn't removed after. (See why he included Syria but try not to laugh).


2) Syria is in an official state of war with israel, israel is the illegal child of NATO, and NATO is run by the USA rendering the USA as a foe state for Syria. Now as funny as it may sounds, but Syria lifted the state of emergency the US criticizes it for on April 20, 2011, although it's still in a state of war with israel, while USA is under Emergency Law since 2000 and it's not in any state of war, last extension for one year was on June 20, 2011.!


3) USA directly fought wars with Syria over and in Lebanon 1982, preached Syria's sovereignty in 2008 and droned a house of a family mistaking it for a terrorist camp (of course FoxNews sees any of the others as a terrorist), continues to supply israel, even at the account of its own citizens, with the latest advanced weapons, technology, money, total support in international organizations to the extent that if you need to become a president of the USA you need to compete with giving it the most. (Obama: No other administration in the US history "has done more in support of israel's security" than his).


4) USA was and still involved in covert operations in Syria including backing oppositions abroad and inside the country to topple the existing government (an act of war of course, and imagine the opposite!!) with US Tax Payers money even when it faced the worst economic crisis recently.


For the few reasons mentioned above and so many others like sanctions, media distortion campaigns, assisting in assassinating Syrian army officers, and so on, a holder of a US passport doesn't practically have any right to interfere in Syria's policies, politics, lifestyle, interests... at all.