Friday, February 22, 2013

Mainstream Media And The Art of Trolling

Imagine this scenario: You receive a call at work, a hysterical voice on the other end of the line screams there has been an accident in the neighborhood, and your child is somewhere on the street..

You rush hysterically from work, reaching your neighborhood you are met with scenes of chaos, emergency vehicles and sounds of screaming sirens fill the entire area, you see body parts on the ground, people are frantically searching in the debris, seems there was an explosion, could be a gas pipe or a vehicle, you are still in a state of shock, when you suddenly notice a small body on the ground with familiar clothes, as you rush towards it, you notice a small pink school bag which you remember very well, your mind is very confused, as you realise, that this is your child laying on the ground, body charred, with limbs missing and covered in blood, gasping as she takes her last few breaths. You see at least a dozen bodies with the same horrific injuries, body parts are scattered everywhere, at the same time several news crews arrive on the scene as one begins filming the area a reporter starts asking witnesses about the circumstances surrounding the explosion and their reactions, people watching this live at home are commiserating with you, when suddenly the TV presenter notices there's a sign on the other side of the street with the words written upside down, turning his focus, the reporter begins asking questions about the sign .. People watching from their homes start laughing, 'activists' on media pick it up and begin sharing it on social media outlets, immediately the main media focus is on the sign, with the massive tragedy already forgotten.

At the hospital with what's left of your child's body, you watch desperate people rush in and frantically ask for names of the deceased and injured, while the TV monitor in the corridor screens images of the “upside down” sign, as the presenters make jokes from their studios. Tell me about your feelings then.

If you think this cannot happen, continue reading below.

Under the title: Misleading Media on Syria - Shaping Public Opinion, I aim to post a few examples of how the NATO aligned mainstream media is used to systematically shape public opinion by fabricating, misleading, dis-informing and deliberately manipulating in order to further the goal of theirs paymasters.


I endeavor to show irrefutable evidence of incidents that occurred while the NATO media was playing a huge role in demonizing the Syrian state, its army, its police & security forces, even normal people who just didn't support the NATO imposed 'spontaneous public uprising' on them. These examples, aired by media channels based inside Syria, have caused these channels to be banned by the same parties preaching Syrians 'democracy' & 'free speech'. On December 05, 2011 the European Union ministers of foreign affairs convened to come up with a decision that will stain their foreign policy & label them hypocrites forever. They decided to ban a number of Syrian based channels, namely Addounia  the privately owned satellite channel, Champress a privately owned website & Al Watan Newspaper a privately owned newspaper. And not surprisingly the Arab League, (a formation representing the governments of the Arab World, with the exception of Syria) issued an order on September 05, 2012 to 2 satellite management companies, Nilesat & Arabsat, sponsored by the League, to take down Syrian State satellite TV, Syria News another state owned satellite channel & Addounia TV the privately owned channel from air, for no publicly stated logical reason. But perhaps this is the real reason:


Exhibit no. 13: Public opinion VS Imperialists 
The Art of Trolling 

Syria has been subjected to an evil plan called the Arab Spring, we discussed this in detail before and you can check one of the tens of posts earlier on this same blog to see how they depended on the stupidity of the Sheeple and they weren't disappointed: The Arab Spring, A Spontaneous Public Uprising, Or Is It?

When the plot failed in Syria to follow the paths of Libya, Egypt and Tunisia and people didn't take to the streets in the 'soft revolution' as was planned, the always ready terrorists were a must to be used, and Al Qaeda was imported from Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, even from Egypt & Tunisia, the project is about to collapse and all the gains are about to vaporize if the plotters didn't react fast, and we started hearing terms like: 'President is killing own people', 'Freedom', 'Massacres', 'Random Tanks Shelling', and all these terms we got used to while the real perpetrators were none else than NATO's most valuable asset: Al Qaeda.


But what is the real plan? Is it really spreading democracy? Out of a sudden and after killing millions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen.. the western leaders want to export their 'wonderful freedom & democracy' to our region? The answer is not as difficult as you think and the goals are so essential: 'Control riches resources and secure Israel'.

The Levant is the next Persian Gulf, lots of riches including vast quantities of natural gas, oil, uranium among others were discovered in between Syria, Lebanon, Occupied Palestinian territories and Cyprus. This is a must have for the western economies. Add to that, the West wants to build the gas pipeline called Nabucco Pipeline, on one hand, and another pipeline (we accurately dubbed 'Camelistan'), on the other hand. The latter pipeline is meant for Qatari oil to get to Europe through KSA, Jordan, Syria then Turkey and from there to Europe thus cutting Russian pipelines feeding Europe now. This network of pipelines has been nicknamed 'Pipelinestan' by Pepe Escobar, a brilliant political analyst.

That's not all, there's another very important goal for the west to achieve in our region which is 'protecting the security of Israel', even if it was on the account of their own citizens, they don't care. Most of the wars in the region including the invasion of Iraq, were having this main purpose on mind, remember dismantling the Iraqi army was the first decision of the US in Iraq? To achieve such a goal there should be a shift in the ideologies of the major armies in the region and namely: containing the Turkish army and dismantling the Syrian and Egyptian armies. While they are very successful on the Turkish front where tens of top army generals either resigned, imprisoned or early retired for no logical reason, read this piece 2 years ago, which was followed by many generals resigning in bulk ore ending their services one way or another: Step by Step to Tayyiban Revolution or Reborn of Rebublic of Turkey?


On the Egyptian front there's a huge success for the western powers now with Muslim Brotherhood in power and I wouldn't want to waste my time here repeating how this terrorist organization was founded, supported and supplied by the west, but now the Egyptian Army is being exhausted in internal issues and being morally weakened to avoid being any threat to Israel.

In Syria, well.. Here is where the western powers are still working hard to 'achieve democracy' in any way they could, even getting their old buddies from Al Qaeda and rebranding them: Freedom Fighters, Rebels, Free Syrian Army, Jabhat Al Nusra.. whatever, just to exhaust the Syrian Army systematically while the mainstream media, NATO's propaganda machines work hard to demonize the army by repeating: Syrian Army killing own people and such silly accusations to engrave it in the conscious of their audience: the Sleeping Sheeple. We reached a point where NATO openly is funding, training, supplying, leading Al Qaeda members in Syria and fighting them in Mali, Afghanistan and elsewhere. A friend of mine sent a comment to newly appointed John Kerry saying: 'We have a problem now, our friends the rebels want to kill our friends in the opposition' and attaching the following video clip to him:

Video with English subtitles, open in YouTube and turn cc on if required

How to secure the 'Jewish State of Israel' and control the resources of this region? Install puppet regimes who would follow orders blindly, but the Iraqi experience taught the west a huge lesson: after 8 years of direct occupation and as soon as Iraq started to get a grasp on its own sovereignty, the country shifted alliance from being a US stooge to the opposite camp. So the plan was keep on dividing the sovereign countries in the region into smaller, controllable sectarian based entities and keep them fighting together as long as possible to wear each other out, or ethnically cleanse the region and fulfill the biblical prophecies by working on establishing the Jewish Empire waiting their king, the anti-Christ, and on the other side support the establishing of an Islamist (not Islamic) state and laugh at the less educated and call it: the Islamic Caliphate.. The Rise of the Caliphate, is an excellent short piece to check.

A brave young man went on a personal journey from the city of Idleb, north west of Syria, into Turkey, the country that is mainly behind the 'spontaneous public revolution in Syria' as if their own Kurdish prosecution is not enough for them, and came back with shocking and disturbing facts he put it in this report: Shocking Facts from Behind Enemy Lines.

There is a major problem facing the western powers when it's coming to Syria, they are not winning for many reasons, one of them is they exposed their own plans very early that the real international community noticed and helped Syria avoid a western intervention to install 'democracy' in the country.


And there's the Syrian Army which is adored and supported by the Syrian people, I know you might feel stupid reading this if it's new for you, but it's about time you wake up: (Syrians Adore Their Syrian Arab Army)

And finally the media is not working out because Syrians have a very long established anti-propaganda powerful genes in their 7,000 years of history accumulated, which arrogant plotters at the Pentagon ignored when they planned for the 'New Middle East' through 'Creative Chaos'.

In order to divert attention of the truth seekers in the west who started realizing what fools they were in supporting this evil plan in the Middle East called the Arab Spring, NATO propaganda turned to what it does best: Trolling.

53 mostly civilians were killed, 238 wounded and the count is still on, was the toll of a deadly suicide car bombing in a Mazraa residential neighborhood in Damascus yesterday. The horrible images from the scene were beyond describing. And instead of focusing on those lives lost and for what reason? And how to help the Syrians fight this kind of terror? Are the western countries doing good in supporting these 'freedom fighters' in the country, well that's not the goal, right? The propaganda machines come to work, and use all the trolling experience it has. There are millions effected from the Syrian Crisis, but there's this one single person let's concentrate on..! Remember the single Chinese blind man activist representing the aspiration of the 1.5 billion Chinese? The Burmese single activist Aung San Suu Kyi, who once her role is over and 'democracy achieved' we started hearing stories of thousands of Muslims being killed in Burma whom were protected previously by the 'evil junta'?

There's a man who is either planted as an infiltrator to discredit the Syrian state media, or he has a personal media appearing desire, who trails the Syrian TV whenever it goes to a scene of a terrorist attack to appear on the screen and express his feelings. This single person is being picked by the mainstream and the 53 killed, hundreds wounded story was dwarfed in exchange. Remember the example this post started with? Imagine yourself in the place of someone who lost a love one in this bombing then check the Lede Blog of the New York Times, the western leading trolling propagandists, they pick on the man and present him in a sarcastic way in a very obvious trolling strategy:


Then comes the other trolls for rescue, other mainstream media would pick on this single person and start spreading this piece of information diverting the attention of the Sheeple to something with a hidden opinion shaping: 'Whatever comes from Syrian State Media is a lie', which the sleeping conscious would apply to the news of those tens killed and hundreds injured then start to look elsewhere.

A propagandist spreading the blog among the Sheeple who picks it immediately
Since when would a correspondent of a one news agency promote posts of another?! How thoughtful! 
And that's not taking sources to build a story, that's mere marketing of another outlet, but the professionalism isn't important at all here, media competition isn't as well, it's destroying Syria which is to achieve at any cost.

28 retweets and 4 favorites in less than an hour then 38 retweets and 9 favorites in less than 10 hours. Don't you love social media? 

Trolls 'activists' make sure to attach the link of the trolling piece on each post talking about the suffering of Syrians
Which is more important? The story of the killed ones or the story of a man who might be an infiltrator by the way, to focus on?! 

Now you get it? I hope so.

WMDs: They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you,
not because they're smart, it's because you're foolable.
I encourage you to visit each link provided in this post if you are a truth seeker, otherwise, 
go back to sleep.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Bolivian President Evo Morales on Syrian Crisis & Iranian Nuclear Program

What the people of the world should listen to, and I put it here for them to read. It comes from the same person who said: "There won't be a coup d'État in the United States because there's no US embassy there".

".. in the Syrian crisis and in Iranian nuclear program problems with America, how do you view those crisis & what advise do you have from your example in Latin America that you may pass on to the people of the Middle East?

Answer: Well first, some powers have no authority, nor ethics, nor moral authority as presidents to speak about nuclear weapons. Secondly, conflicts within countries are provoked by capitalism and then they intervene militarily, and a good example is Libya, and Gaddafi, it was the Libyan oil for some powers, I should say I was in a meeting with heads of states in Europe and I was asking one of the presidents: Well now who is in charge of Libyan oil? And the president said: Don't ask me, ask the other president.. Another European president.

So, with the pretext of social conflict, nuclear weapons, drug trafficking, or weapons of mass destruction, for humanity.. these are all pretext to intervene and take over the natural resources in that country. We understand exactly what's going on: 

Anti-Capitalist governments and anti-imperialist governments are accused of being drug trafficking, and fomenting internal conflict then of course you need an intervention, but ultimately it's not social, it's really about natural resources not social conflict, that's why Bolivia does not believe in war or interventions, nor does it want to discuss that in the United Nations, if there's a democracy or no-democracy in the United Nations. It's not possible that all the countries the United Nations would be subject to the Security Council.. What Security Council?! It's an insecurity council for mankind around the world, that would be another discussion.

So, well, as peoples where need to avoid any social conflict, that's not the issue, without social conflict there would be no reason for intervening, there're groups where conflicts are fostered by the government of the United States, they create conflicts, as they have tried to do in Bolivia and in other places, and then justify a coup de etat as they've done in Latin America as well. And Bolivia after approving a new constitution we have become a peaceful country, pacifists, we don't provoke anyone, but everyone also should be prepared if there's any kind of territorial aggression against us. I come from the culture of life not from the culture of death. I do not share policies or actions around death as been planned by the Security Council, and there we have huge differences of opinion, as a president, as a government and as a country within the United Nations, once again that would be an ongoing discussion in order to make the United Nations more democratic.

Another example is the economic blockade against Cuba, they embargo, 2 or 3 countries rejected, all the countries in the world support Cuba, so why does the United Nations not make the resolutions be complied with? Israel & the United States reject and then all rest of the countries of the world are subject to the will of the United States and Israel.. What democracy?! And we can give many other examples of what happens in the world like that."

Watch the video:


If you don't come to democracy, democracy will come to you.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Why Should Assad Ignore The Opposition Abroad

The question that should be asked by those monitoring the crisis in Syria and following the updates on the ground and the news of the clashes between the state troops and the fanatic Wahhabi Sex Jihadists, is: What difference would bringing those claiming to represent the Syrian opposition abroad make if they have no base on the ground whatsoever? 

The following video clip is a collection of interviews and scenes from Binnish, a calm town in the Syrian Idleb province, north west of Syria near the Turkish borders; it brings you the opinion of those on the ground in what USA, Britain and other western nations and their stooges consider: the sole representatives of the Syrian people, the aspiration of the Syrian people, the legitimate representatives of the Syrian opposition, and other empty definitions and names. 

Hillary Clinton, the founder of the NCS the Qatari Oppsotionists of Syrian State & Syrian People
Watch and enjoy, it's meant to be a gift to those secular figures in the Syrian opposition abroad covering the reality of the 'rebels' and the 'revolution'. Open in YouTube and turn cc on for English subtitles if required: 


After this, can you tell us why on earth should Syrian president and his government talk with those abroad in the Qatari Opposition Coalition of Syria NCS, or in the Istanbul Council of Opposition of Syria SNC, claiming they represent the Syrians and the Syrians aspirations?

Read more about the rise of the Islamist (not Islamic) Caliphate: http://democratic-syria.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-rise-of-caliphate.html 

The Arab Spring

Sunday, February 3, 2013

The Rise of the Caliphate


Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him has mentioned the rise of the caliphates after his death then how the caliphate would collapse and kingdoms would ensue, then after a while a new Caliphate would rise and lead the nation once again.

Enemies of Islam have read this prophecy and understood it quite well to the extent they manipulated many Muslims in following it. New sects of Islam had to be invented, sects which look like Islam but would work against the tolerance religion, again in another Hadith (words of the prophet) it was mentioned: 'My nation would split into few & seventy sects, all are misguided except one which will remain following my preaching'. Wahhabism was invented by the Brits and used since. Salafism was taken by Wahhabism and it grew very strong especially after Abdul Aziz Al Saud used it to gain influence over Arabia and called it after his family's name.

Wahhabism for Islam is just like Zionism to Judaism and KKK for Christianity, if not worse. Every extremism in any belief or ideology would work against the cause of that belief or ideology naturally, so imagine when it was founded to destroy that belief or ideology.

Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him described a group of people he called Khawarij (Outlaws of Islam), he said they'll be looking like Muslims, growing beards but not shaping it unlike Muslims, wearing shorter dresses, while Muslims are only told to wear dresses that do not touch the ground while walking to avoid filth picked from the ground, he added these group of people will recur multiple times, they will be killing Muslims and making allies with enemies of Islam. Does that sound familiar? Look at the Wahhabi clerics and the followers of Wahhabism how close they are in Saudi & Qatar to the Zionist leaders of the west.

The Zionist leaders of the west have used Wahhabi followers to further their goals, the military wing of Wahhabism is Al Qaeda in its different names depending on the region it is, its political wing regionally is called the Muslim Brotherhood and its international movement is under the wing of Hizbul Tahrir. 


Note how in this documentary this Hizbul Tahrir enjoys freedom in practicing its call for establishing the Caliphate which is supposed to unite Muslims and control their huge nation which naturally should be a threat to the Zionist hegemony, but by organizing it into this system: Al Qaeda fighters, Muslim Brotherhood political parties and Hizbul Tahrir international body, the Zionists dream of keeping the control on the inevitable coming Muslim Ummah (nation) and its leader the Caliph.
This might explain the dream of the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan of becoming a Caliph over Muslims, and the cancerous Muslim Brotherhood parties in the countries falling into the well designed Arab Spring ,or as Condoleezza Rice put it: 'Creative Chaos'.
They fool you, they keep fooling you & they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart,
it's because you're foolable.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Misleading Media on Syria - Shaping Public Opinion - 12


Under the title: Misleading Media on Syria - Shaping Public Opinion, I aim to post a few examples of how the NATO aligned mainstream media is used to systematically shape public opinion by fabricating, misleading, dis-informing and deliberately manipulating in order to further the goal of theirs paymasters.


I endeavor to show irrefutable evidence of incidents that occurred while the NATO media was playing a huge role in demonizing the Syrian state, its army, its police & security forces, even normal people who just didn't support the NATO imposed 'spontaneous public uprising' on them. These examples, aired by media channels based inside Syria, have caused these channels to be banned by the same parties preaching Syrians 'democracy' & 'free speech'. On December 05, 2011 the European Union ministers of foreign affairs convened to come up with a decision that will stain their foreign policy & label them hypocrites forever. They decided to ban a number of Syrian based channels, namely Addounia  the privately owned satellite channel, Champress a privately owned website & Al Watan Newspaper a privately owned newspaper. And not surprisingly the Arab League, (a formation representing the governments of the Arab World, with the exception of Syria) issued an order on September 05, 2012 to 2 satellite management companies, Nilesat & Arabsat, sponsored by the League, to take down Syrian State satellite TV, Syria News another state owned satellite channel & Addounia TV the privately owned channel from air, for no publicly stated logical reason. But perhaps this is the real reason:


Exhibit no. 12: Public opinion VS Imperialists 
Preparing the Public to Accept Targeting 
Commercial Airplanes 

Targeting or threatening to target a commercial airplane anywhere on the planet is an act of terror, no matter who carries it out, no matter what is the cause, no matter by who, well, except when it comes to Syria, then all international law and human standards are twisted, purposely, and don't be surprised: by those supposed to protect and enforce these standards and the international law: the International Community.


The above video is a show off, the range of the machine-guns they're using is shorter than causing serious harm to the plane in this case, they're not aiming directly at the plane or in front of it but this video is not shot and the act is not played randomly, it's a highly sophisticated act by experts in psychology and warmongering whom manipulate their subjects behaviors by controlling their unconsciousness.

From their own YouTube channels, NATO propaganda media call them 'Activists' 
Most of the crimes committed in Syria by Al Qaeda FSA terrorists couldn't be carried out even by the most sadist criminals in the world, unless the criminal is being incited enough to carry such crimes without any feelings or thinking. Chopping human beings, beheading, lynching, mass murdering.. all cannot be done by conscious humans, they have to be drugged or mentally manipulated, and both techniques are widely reported in Syria especially when examining arrested criminals.

Al Qaeda - Jabhat Al Nusra - Abu Sayyaf - Jamaat Islamiyeh - Boko Haram - 
FSAwhatever you like, they're always there where NATO needs them
Weapons of Mass Deception: 
Weapons of Mass Deception
You, please remove the umbrella:
They fool you, they keep fooling you & they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart,
It's because you're foolable.

Donate

Donate
Donate to Help Us Continue