Friday, April 27, 2012

Nations Led By Criminals Are Doomed to Failure

It's appalling when a convicted criminal accuses others of crimes, it's more appalling when this same criminal can run away with his crimes while the criminal image is painted against the accused.

Just 2 days ago, the entire world relived the horrific moments over 1.5 million Armenian civilians lived before they were brutally massacred by the Ottoman empire during its last days, another 500,000 Syrians were massacred by the same criminal entity, Syrians commemorate this crime on the 6th of May every year in a day named the Martyrs Day, when the majority number of intellectuals were hanged by the Ottoman ruler of Damascus & Beirut in the year 1916.

Just 2 days after the remembrance of such a crimes which the criminal refuses to admit till date even after almost a century, the Turkish foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu speaks before the Turkish parliament to defend the new Ottoman dream reviving in his sick mind and his government of an extremist fanatic party the AKP live for achieving. The Turkish government was carried away with its achievement in supporting NATO interference in some Arab countries to replace current regimes with NATO stooges and puppet regimes that serve their Zionist commands without any objection, the Turkish government's new Ottoman dream faced a thick and very firm wall when it reached Syria. In Syria, they saw their dream endangered and can sense if nothing major happens (a war) their dream is vanishing and the counter effect might cost them their entire political lives.

“A new Middle East is emerging and we will continue to lead this. Turkey will pioneer this order of peace. … The Turkish people of 74 million are [standing] next to the Syrian people and will continue to be so,” Davuto─člu said.

First, who appointed Turkey to lead a new Middle East? What type of a Middle East they want to lead where  their fanatic party, the Muslim Brotherhood, is branching in some Arab countries namely: Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, while plans for Algeria, Mauritania and Yemen were delayed for some time? A New Middle East that comes out of 'Creative Chaos' is a plan mentioned by the infamous US former secretary of state Condoleezza Rice and now we know it was named: the Arab Spring

Then, didn't the Turkish foreign minister read the results of the latest Turkish parliamentary to see that he doesn't speak of the 74 million Turks, he could at least see the same venue where he was talking to see how many seats his party lost 15 seats to the Turkish opposition. And in case he was still blind, some opposition deputies interrupted him to remind him that he doesn't speak for the 74 million Turkish people.

Finally, which Syrian people he stands next to? The SNC created in Istanbul, Turkey mostly of exiled Syrian opposition figures including a majority of the same fanatic outlaw group the Muslim Brotherhood? Or those 200 Syrian opposition members mostly with dual citizenships occupying the sphere of western backed mainstream media? Obviously not the Syrian people who voted overwhelmingly in favour of the new Syrian constitution and who filled the Syrian squares rejecting foreign intervention in their internal affairs.



"The foreign minister also said Turkey had warned Syrian President Bashar al-Assad even before the beginning of the Arab Spring to implement reforms, but Turkey began to openly criticize Assad only when he “began to turn cities to open air prisons, punished cities en masse and bombed mosques.”"

They openly launched an attack on Syrian president in midst of Hama events when the city was ran by Turkish sponsored terrorist group duped FSA, the umbrella which Al Qaeda and other fanatics take cover under it.. At that time this same minister Davutoglu visited Damascus and met with Syrian president, offered him to dismiss the Syrian govt and replace it with one that has over 50% of it from the outlaw other terrorist group: the Muslim Brotherhood - Syria branch (Ikhwan Muslimeen), which the Turkish govt party is their Turkish branch, and when the Syrian leadership refused this unexpected interference in their internal issues, Davutoglu left Damascus angry and the Turkish propaganda was unleashed along with western backed Zionist media, Hama was cleansed within 48 hours of that infamous visit and Erdogan went from a mad leader to a mad dog leading a great nation as he was seeing his dream of becoming an empire vanish before his eyes.. read what the FM says: "A new Middle East is emerging and we will continue to lead this. Turkey will pioneer this order of peace" who appointed them to lead the new Middle East? last time they led it they imposed ignorance and illiteracy on the region for over 400 years..


The Turkish FM then says: "The culprit is the Baath regime, which orders shooting at people who took to the streets with demands for freedom."

To understand why launching an attack by all NATO stooges on the Baath party when the Syrian leadership is formed by a coalition of parties called The Progressive Front that has more than 6 parties in it, while Turkish govt itself is ran by a single dominating party:

Baath party is the fierce enemy to the Ottoman Empire dream, it calls for the Unity of Arab Nations and Freedom of any colonization and to lead a Socialist state, its ideology is in its slogan: Unity, Freedom, Socialism (the socialist community in Syria is an upgrade of the Socialism that was in the Eastern bloc, it is based on a sharing of responsibilities between merchants, state and national societies in leading and managing the nation). All 3 principals are the foes of an new Ottoman dream. 

This cheap propaganda is laughable by the Syrian people as no one knows their community more than themselves and they have an ultra sensitivity towards foreign interference in their internal issues especially when it's coming from former occupiers such as France, or former and current occupiers as Turkey which till date occupies a very dear portion of Northern Syria: Kilikia including the Iskandaron Strip.

Turkey hosts armed terrorists duped Free Syrian Army, an umbrella of extremist Jihadist fighters from many Arab and non Arab countries including Al Qaeda, it created refugee camps weeks before any sign of a humanitarian crisis that requires any refugee camp across the borders, it finance, promotes and train terrorists then send them to Syria to fight, it even airlifted Libyan Al Qaeda terrorists to the Turkish Syrian borders, later on, the same Turkish government cries of a single incident that Syrian border guards were chasing some of those terrorists who crossed the borders without any Syrian soldier crossing the border line! Davutoglu government doesn't only cry, it threatens Syria as it was doing continuously since the open criticism mentioned above, and this time asks NATO to apply Article 5 to of their charter and tries to involve the entire coalition of criminal states in another bloody conflict, Erdogan, the Turkish Prime Minister said during an official visit to China on April 11“NATO has a responsibility to protect Turkish borders”, signalling that Turkey may officially ask NATO members to apply Article 5 of the NATO Charter, which says an attack on any member shall be considered an attack on all if the situation in Syria becomes a serious enough threat to Turkish national security.

The biggest hypocrisy of the Turkish FM comes in his words: "We support the valid demands of the Syrian people, regardless of their religion, sect and ethnicity".. now check again above what does the real Syrian people on the streets of Syria want, not the 200 opposition members abroad in Istanbul, Paris, London and Washington hotels wants.

“They may be stronger in space, but we are stronger on the ground. Still, we want to win on the ground and in space” These words by the Syrian president Bashar Al Assad on the day of the referendum of the new constitution explains it all. The 'space' he mentioned in Arabic means the virtual space they created in media and the 'ground' is reality of events inside Syria.

And as I always say: "They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, it's because you're 'Foolable'".


You can read again my post: WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception to measure the level of deception you were subjected to.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception

mainstream media logos

I'm sorry if I missed some in the above banner, there are so many of them and don't have time nor space for all of them, but the above are the leading worst of the rest.

"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed" Mark Twain.

Shock and Awe, your enemy won't have time to grasp their breaths, so does your citizens, keep moving them from a conflict to another and they will keep supporting you. The Shock and Awe doesn't only apply on your enemies as you see, it applies on your people, your allies, foes, and no thanks to the mainstream media propaganda which keeps you on your feet awaiting to hear achievements and victories without questioning the credibility or source of information you are fed 24/7 non-stop.

Let's guess who controls the mainstream media? Well, let's not guess, it's all over the net now. I invite you NOT to read this article (Controlling Most US Media), it's a bit outdated but nevertheless the info it contains has barely changed. 


Do you believe in Conspiracy Theory? Of course you don't, you are not stupid, this is only for the silly, naive and shallow people, you are much more sophisticated than such stuff and you don't want to look dumb among your friends, nobody believes the Conspiracy Theory because the world is only led by the good people and nobody ever plans anything, especially in Free Media (you won't click the link under Free Media because you don't believe in the silly Conspiracy Theory thing). But maybe you should spend 20 minutes reading what's in this article and comparing to your surroundings: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Now back to our story, when the Shock and Awe fails and the conflict takes more time, people will start thinking, they're not supposed to, but what to do, it's a human nature, and you have to deal with it, in this case the only solution lies with Mainstream Media, you control it, or those who control it are your allies, ask them to intensify their propaganda, each news bulletin should have at least a line or two in its headlines about your cause, analysts should be available to discuss your point of view, you can accept some criticism but make sure those criticizing you don't have the last words, bring someone to ridicule their replies and carry on, reports should be available, and if you don't have news: create some for God sake.. Your plans will fail if the public starts asking questions.

With the introduction of social media and then citizen journalists who needs to verify credibility, so many blogs I personally wrote about the use of these tools to carry out the media campaign to justify the cause of demonizing your enemy then justifying their killings. The audience when they keep flipping from one news outlet to another to find the same news of such: "dictator killing own people' and 'public uprisings brutally oppressed by tyrants' they'll have no other choice but to buy such stuff, nobody would care to search for the other side of the story, so many sides your friends in mainstream media are providing, and if you don't believe it there're plenty of Youtube videos to prove it, and it just happens that all these videos (over 64,000 in the case of Syria) are so much filling the pattern: shaky videos from mobile phones, breathless citizens running across the streets, so much blood everywhere, sounds of explosions, and if that's not available make it! 

Some examples in the Libyan case were the so many times Saif ulislam Gaddafi was arrested before he was actually arrested, and his brother Khamis was so many times killed before he was actually killed, or maybe not..! The anti-Gaddafi protests and rebels reaching Bab Alaziziya in Benghazi and Doha in Qatar that looks similar to the real one in Tripoli, Libya.. and so on. Al Jazeera's Fake Green Square. (for example)

Al Jazeera tried to do the same in Syria by building miniatures similar to known sites in different cities of the country and fake demonstrations near it, their infamous try was with the miniature of the Clock Tower in Homs which some real activists blew the attempt when comparing the real Clock Tower with the fake ones that kept appearing on this NATO mouthpiece.

And here is where the Shock and Awe failed, the prolonged conflict in Syria gave time to many to revise and compare news aired on mainstream media with the actual ones, and the same Al Jazeera in coordination with its sister channel Al Arabiya exposed themselves when they were given information that the Zero hour in Syria is imminent and simultaneously both channels started broadcasting on an early Friday news of tens of thousands of anti-Assad protesters fill two mains squares in Damascus city, the Abbasid and Ommayad squares, thinking by this they're giving the signal to NATO stooges to flood these two squares and at the same time to push those curious to go there to see for themselves then there will be ready planted 'activists' who will be filming any crowd, airing the same via satellite connections on those two pathetic channels who in turn will magnify the picture same like what they did with the initial Tahrir square (the article was manipulated later by Al Arabiya & the link image mentioned in it that shows stitching of several images to give impression of huge crowds, the image was removed for unknown reason), they failed because those plotting are not Syrians and not aware of so much of reality not starting with the laziness of Syrians on a Friday morning that nothing would move them other than bringing Foul or Fattah ingredients, no politics, no NATO and nothing else would cause a Syrian to gather anywhere on a Friday morning, then the main punch to their plot was the fact that the Syrian state tv's head quarters is in the centre of Ommayad Square itself, overseeing all 7 main roads branching from the square from a single angle, and that on Friday morning there's a live tv programme, and the fact that all Syrians know this pushed them to switch from Al Jazeera & Arabiya channels immediately to Syrian tv to see from the studio how that lie was exposed, furthermore, the presenters were notified of the fake news aired on those two pathetic channels, and the presenters would look over their shoulders onto the square to see how normal lazy Friday morning cars are moving that time, and the TV crews were immediately dispatched to the streets of both squares to interview people who ridiculed that step, a final punch to the two stations credibility.
What's left of the original image on the net, the original one was hundreds of times bigger than this




Another pathetic attempt was by the French France24 channel that cut a live cross talk show to announce the resignation of the Syrian Ambassador to France Ms. Lamia Shakkour because of the 'brutal oppression by president Assad's regime' as they put it, then to receive a fake phone from someone claiming to be Ms. Shakkour, just like a drama show, and at the end had to deny the story after receiving a harsh criticism by Ms. Shakkour in a press conference and the ambassador's threats to file a legal case against the channel. This pathetic attempt was meant to embarrass the ambassador and encourage, as they thought, other ambassadors to resign worldwide, such attempt didn't live more than 20 minutes (Al Jazeera channel insists on the resignation while the ambassador was on phone with Syrian state tv denouncing such news as cheap). And just for the record, this attempt was on June 8, 2011 and  till date there's not a single resignation of any Syrian ambassador worldwide, nor any diplomat to the level of 3rd secretary in a consulate!


Shocking propaganda isn't limited to cheap channels receiving such crap, digesting it and feeding the digested crap to their Sheeple audience, when there's no crap to broadcast they create it! It's difficult to believe because who would risk credibility for propaganda? Not when the prize is destroying Syria and not if they thought they can get away with it, and intelligence agencies informed them that the Syrian 'regime' would fall in few days so they went for the plot to the extent that a prominent US news channel actually plotted destroying oil pipelines in Homs in direct coordinating with terrorists to accuse the Syrian army of shelling them to punish the people. This channel, CNN, was defaced by the Syrian state tv and I discussed in an earlier post (CNN Knew About September 11 Attacks 16 Hours Earlier). 


A reporter for Al Jazeera using high-tech satellite devices spies on the Libyan Army communication in this report and brags about it, remember that Colonel Gaddafi was demonized a long while ago and therefore it's fine to spy on his forces by a 'Journalist' who shares the information with 'freedom fighters', then don't wonder why such reporters become targets in retaliations by regular forces tracing the spying devices: 


The role such mainstream media plays is vital for NATO, they're spies, they can reach places without suspicion, can smuggle communication devices to insurgents duped 'freedom fighters' and contributes to the military aggression. Their role is not only to demonize foes, but moved into an uglier phase of actually contributing to the military actions and sabotage.

You can understand the decision of Syrian government to expel foreign reporters from Syria at the beginning of riots in the country last year and then allowing selective reporters to enter, even those who entered based on pressure on the Syrian government by the UN and non-governmental organizations (other NATO tools), those reporters manipulated reports, interviews, and even when sending unbiased reports to their stations, the stations do not broadcast their reports, the same thing that happened with Al Arabiya reporter Hanna Houshan several times and was scolded by Syrian Foreign Minister Mr. Moallem on several occasions for the same. 

Yet, the most alarming interview distorted by a foreign prominent news channel was the one ABC News reporter Barbara Walters did with president Assad himself and doctored, edited, distorted the whole interview before was forced to air the original full unedited interview after the Syrian Foreign Ministry spokesperson showed them that they have a copy of the same interview in full..! (Check it here).


The BBC had its share in Syria's crisis and again put its credibility at risk just for the sake of promoting propaganda on Syria, despite willingly and fully knowing the level of deception it's involved in, but still takes accounts of terrorists and their lies at its shows with no shame and no responsibility and no respect to its own image and the sacrifices of many of its own reporters in shaping that image. In an earlier post I explained how the BBC Promoted a Terrorists to a Victim


The Guardian has proved to be a mouthpiece for the criminals, you can see interviews with convicted criminals on it criminalizing others, who usually are the subject of the demonizing policy, and if you as a reader try to point out the fact that the interviewed is a convicted criminal they delete your comment, ban you from further comments and sends you a nasty email reminding you with their Community Standards! This happened with me personally when I commented once on an interview with Ali Sadr Al Din Bayanoni, a convicted terrorist and head of an outlaw terrorists organization (as per the records of his native country), who named the sitting Syrian president Bashar Al Assad with all bad names he could dig from his vocabulary he learned from his gangs including calling the Syrian president a criminal and a thug and other bad words, they deleted my comment and reminded me that it's against their community standards to call a writer of their articles a criminal!!


Reuters reporter on Syria, a Jordanian citizen Mr. Oweis was arrested by Syrian authorities at the beginning of the riots in Syria for faking a report on the events and putting words in an injured soldier's mouth to show him as saying that he was shot by fellow officers for refusing to shoot at peaceful protesters when the injured soldier was shouting with the loudest faint voice he could that the shots he received were from the protesters side he's facing and not from his back. The reporter's bad luck was when a Syrian tv reporter was next close to him and recorded the incident on his own camera, and when all news houses taking reports from Reuters aired the doctored interview where the soldier's voice can't be heard clearly and only the reporter's voice is heard putting words in the soldier's mouth, the Syrian TV aired the film recorded by its own staff showing the Reuters reporter and the real dialogue that happened! ABC News of Australia learned a lesson after airing a Reuters report on Syria and here is what they had to say:



There's nothing called Free Media, whoever pays for the media house either by shareholders contribution or by advertisements controls to a very large extent the strategy of these media houses. Do you think social media is more credible as unbiased free speech supporters providing you with a platform to voice your opinion? Think again. At least with the Syrian issue where we see and been seeing Facebook deleting continuously a page dedicated for a real Free Speech supporting Syrian youth group calling themselves The Syrian Electronic Army over 150 times by now and as soon as the page appears back again, accusing them of showing disturbing images, while they keep another page called 'The Syrian Revolution Against Bashar Al Assad' which shows bodies slashed into pieces, beating by terrorists in army uniforms to accuse the Syrian army, and so on, this is not of course, in their scale, against their community standards. They once deleted a picture I posted of a US Army soldier bragging on top of a dead boy's body in Afghanistan claiming it 'violates Facebook's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities', again while they keep supporting the same page that is working to demonize the Syrian president:


Link to Facebook Wall Photo
The Weapons of Mass Deception have much more damaging effects than those of Mass Destruction, they destroy the brain in addition to animalizing the human or in better words: producing the Sheeple audience.


We Warned You

Monday, April 9, 2012

"Syria Scuttles"


Just a small post to give you a hint on how media consumes, digests and passes the crap to the audience in just 2 words.
Today, I was looking for news on Syria and suddenly I kept seeing the same words repeated in so many places: "Syria scuttles" and when I searched for these exact 2 words, this is what I found:
11,400 results in the past 24 hours for "Syria Scuttles"

Yes, that's typical for Google search engine, but shouldn't be typical for journalism, it's not NEWS, it's an interpretation of a news, the news should go as: "Syria demands written 'guarantee' from armed groups" and if you go by the official Syrian government narrative it goes: "Syria Agreed to Annan's Plan as it Respects its Sovereignty" then adds "Syrian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mr. Makdessi added that Annan's speeches at the UN Security Council were interpreted that Syria has pledged to withdraw troops from cities on April 10th, affirming that it is a wrong interpretation, especially that Annan has not offered written guarantees to the Syrian government that the armed groups agreed to stop violence, nor has he offered guarantees that Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey will commit to stop funding and arming terrorist groups." (Check the source here)
And here is how some news agencies have reported it: 
33,400 results for "Syria Demands" in the past 24 hours

That's only to show there's negativity on behalf of the Syrian government and not to show that the 'rebels ACTUALLY rejected to give guarantees' because they're NATO's angels on the ground, and that they would stay outlawed and they'll continue to fight government's police, security and army posts & personnel, take a look on how many search results returned for 'Rebels Rejected': 
143 results for "Syrian rebels reject" - note the titles of the articles

You shouldn't know that the rebels rejected, and in case someone had to highlight this news they'll not give it to you as it is, they have to play with the title to give you an impression that 'rebels' had to 'reject' to keep undermining the Syrian state's legitimacy.
Don't laugh while you take a look at the below image showing the positive news that Syrian government ACTUALLY agreed to Annan's plan and requested written guarantees, then concentrate on Huffington Post's title how it doesn't mention Syrian government agreement and includes it in the body of the article only: 
51 results in the past 24 hours for Syria Agreed (check the last one though: "Has Syria agreed..?"!!

Did you get it?
"They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, but because you're 'Foolable'"
We Warned YOU

If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed. Mark Twain

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Why Didn't Syrian Army Attack israel Since 1973 War?


The Friends of israel Syrian oppositions keep asking the same question time and again whenever they're cornered with their special relations with NATO member states & their stooges in the region especially Turkey: If the Syrian regime as it claims is against israel, why didn't its army attack israel since the 1973 war? And why is the Golan Heights the calmest front for israel in 40 years? 
This particular argument is a multi-level deception and failed propaganda, and to be honest with you, so many Syrians fall short of noticing both.
Firstly: The argument is put by those same individuals who are anti-Syrian regime and claim to be anti-israel as well and working under the NATO shield to undermine the Syrian state. Aren't those same NATO sponsored, Turkey based, Gulfies financed opposition members of the same opposition that vowed to cut ties with Iran, Hizbollah and HAMAS when the only parties in the region that actually resist israel's aggressions are Syrian existing regime, Iran, Hizbollah and HAMAS? Needless to say that Syrian army actually fought directly with israelis army in more than a war in many field battles in Lebanon, and Sultan Yaqob battle is just an example in 1982. The continuous support of the Syrian army to the Lebanese resistant movements led to the israeli withdrawal from Lebanon in the year 2000. While Hizbollah stood up to an israeli all out war in 2006 and managed to preserve the sovereignty of Lebanon then in addition to creating a fear balance with the israeli army, and don't forget when we mention the israeli army that means the entire US arsenal is under their hands in addition to billions of US Dollars every year. HAMAS when it was a resistance movement before shifting to its mentors in the radical Islamic movement the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan), stood along with its fellow factions in the Palestinian resistance to a brutal israeli aggression in the year 2008 against a besieged, highly dense, populated Gaza strip, and managed to fight back. Iran also fights a continuous covert battle with israel since the Islamic revolution took out the Iranian Shah from power. None of those parties would have  managed to win their struggle without the support of the current Syrian 'regime'.
Yet, those who vowed to break this alliance between Syria, Iran, Hizbollah and HAMAS, though they managed to take out HAMAS which now is replaced with 'Islamic Jihad' faction, those are the same blaming the current Syrian 'regime' of not being anti-israel enough by not waging a direct war from the Golan Heights.
Secondly, they try to give an impression that it's the Syrian people not the Syrian 'regime' that are resisting israel's aggressions, which is a very ridiculous and shallow concept taking in consideration that Egyptians count about 3.5 times as the Syrians, yet their former and now existing regimes was blocking Gaza strip and holding a humiliating 'peace treaty' with israel called the Camp David treaty. How come the Egyptian people didn't support Gaza and the Palestinian cause like their counterparts in Syria? Isn't it because the 'regime' in Syria is the one supporting the Palestinian cause in addition to the people and unlike elsewhere in the Arab world?
Thirdly, to wage a direct war with a nuclear state you need a nuclear shield, this shield existed during the 1973 war and that's why the Syrians along with the Egyptians launched the war then after securing the former Soviet Union nuclear shield. Of course before the Egyptian president then Sadat betrayed his Syrian ally late Assad senior and started negotiations under the table with israel while the Syrian army was still fighting on its front, along with an air-bridge by the USA, the israelis moved their entire focus to the Syrian front since they had nothing to fear at the Egyptian front, and even then the Syrian army fought an honourable war of attrition.
Fourthly, to launch a war you need an economy that can afford the direct cost of the war and can stand consequences of the war's aftermath. Without this cover no wise country can launch a war unless the war is forced against it, and since israel and its sponsors didn't launch a direct war over that period and the Syrian 'regime' managed to dodge a war with NATO Turkey over the PKK sponsorship in 1998, Syria wasn't forced to fight a defence war. Syria does not get any support from any ally except in small mutual agreements and tiny financed projects with interest, comparing with the overwhelming financial aid israel gets from USA, Germany and other Western countries. In the 1973 war, Syria and Egypt got the backing of some Arab countries' leaders including late Sheikh Zayed of UAE and assassinated late king Faisal of Saudi. While we noticed the current Saudi regime's reaction to the 2006 war between Hizbollah and israel and which sides it took along with other members of the Arab countries. 2008 israeli aggression on Gaza is another example.
Fifthly, Syria never grasped its breath during its history, it was pushed from one confrontation to another by Western & israeli plots, from ending the Lebanese civil war, to the israeli invasion of Lebanon that lasted from 1982 to 2000, in addition to the previous one in 1978. Plus the hostility from Iraq and Jordan during Saddam and late King Hussein of Jordan, and just for the history, both backed a similar conflict inside Syria that we are witnessing now, by supporting terrorist radical Muslim Brotherhood movement 1976 - 1982. Then there was the 8 years of war between Iraq & Iran that kept all the region on its feet during that period, since Syria was the only Arab state that supported Iran and earned the hatred of all its Arab brothers for that before they realized that Syria's stand was the correct one after Iraq invaded Kuwait, and then Syria contributed in the liberation of Kuwait! Then came the US led invasion of Iraq and the presence of quarter a million NATO troops at the borders and all the negative consequences all these events had on the Syrian economy including the influx of refugees: almost half a million Palestinian since 1948, 1967 and 1982 till now; over 1.2 million Iraqis in 2003 till now, to thousands of Lebanese during the many Lebanese conflicts till now and on.
Despite all of the above, the Syrian 'regime' didn't waste an opportunity and managed to modernize and beef up its defence capability with a well equipped, well trained, mobilizable, fast, effective army, and by securing self-sufficiency in food and necessities, which led to minimal effects of the huge sanctions the country's facing since 1956.
Give Syria a nuclear shield with an economic backing and it'll retrieve the Golan Heights within 2 hours. Without those two shields and with the continuation of plotting by the brothers before the enemies against Syria, it'll be difficult for the Syrians to launch such a war unless forced into it in defence, and that's why the Syrian leadership kept reminding its foes that if it's attacked it would have no other choice but the Samson option, as once late Assad senior said: "If we were forced into a war with israel both of our states will be sent back 100 years in history, (due to the devastation), but 100 years ago there was no israel".
Do you know now why the Golan Heights were the calmest during the past decades? In case you didn't get it yet, let me know in the comments below and I'll explain further, but make your inquiries direct to the point.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Blackwater's Mercenaries Training Syrian Insurgency

And you'll find some who call it: a 'spontaneous public uprising' and part of the 'Arab Spring' that must be fulfilled:



God Bless Syria & all the other free people from the imperialism, Zionism hegemony.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Journalism or What’s Left of It


3 different verifiable trusted sources, if you don't have them don't air the story; if you have to air the story with less than 3 different verifiable trusted sources just make sure you mention it in the disclaimer at the beginning and at the end. Sounds familiar? That was the old days of professional journalism, not any more.
A shaky mobile video with low camera resolution, some sound effects, and lots of movements, by a 'somebody', could be a 'citizen journalist', an 'eye witness', an 'activist', just 'anybody' as far as it serves the purpose; this is the replacement of journalism today.
Reliable and well established news houses would refer to the first option above to preserve their professionalism and their credibility, but the price sometimes is much more worth than credibility, if you don't add drama and action to your stories, people would shift to where they can find it, people want to see blood, atrocities, crimes, the highest watched are the most violence, some very few would still want to hear good news.
To add some spices to your news, bring on 'analysts' to discuss from their point of experience what's really happening to the audience who are too lazy to work their brains to analyse themselves and would prefer a fast meal of junk news, then ask to recruit some people of public desire like celebrities, clerics even fortune tellers so your story gets more attention and more talks, who cares whether it's true or not? People want action and fiction so just give them what they want.
First, I'll advise you to take a look at how journalism is supposed to be based on by reading the Society of Professional Journalists: Code of Ethics. Then when you are ready, come back here and check the following example.
The following is just one example out of tens of thousands that are polluting our environment with propaganda in a systematic way just to serve the same parties, those who ignite strife amongst 'rogue nations' citizens, then cry because of the bloodshed, then interfere to stop the bloodshed by shedding much more blood than would ever occur by its own, then crying again to get the rebuilding contracts. 
He tweets: "#Syria Statistics 383 Days: Killed:12,460 Children:882 Females:773 Soldiers:1,089 Missing:+65,000 Tortured to death:491 Arrested:+212,000" and he's literally nobody, but has 4,826 followers as of now, and this 'tweet' gets 50+ retweets (Twitter doesn't count beyond 50 retweets, this figure could be hundreds) then this is followed by another tweet: "The source of the Syrian casualty/ arrest stat is an independent Swedish journalist SyrienNyheter"

Then someone smarter would ask: "and what are his sources? i mean, is that independent journo in Sweden or Syria?"  

Reply: "He's done the count himself. He's been covering it since beginning."! 
And who is this super journalist that can count by himself: "12,460 killed out of which he was able to identify 882 children and 773 females (I assume adult females), 1,089 Soldiers (killed by who?), he also counted over +65,000 missing, 491 tortured to death and over 212,000 arrested"? Let's assume he did all this counting in 383 days, where is he doing the counting and who is this super independent Swedish journalist? 
http://twitter.com/#!/SyrienNyheter
He's anonymous, and if an independent Swedish journalist being an anonymous is not credible enough, from where is he sourcing his information and statistics? Don't guess much, he stated it on his own profile, it's from Bassam Al Baghdadi, an Iraqi writer living in Stockholm, Sweden and counting the Syrian casualties! 
If you find the above not stupid enough to base your news thus judgement on, take a look at the following image: 
It's a Top Tweet by a guy sitting in Kabul, Afghanistan!
A nobody sitting in his tent in Kabul, Afghanistan with let me assume, some NATO technology to stay connected from there, reporting news about Syria, basing his reports on an 'independent Swedish journalist' who happens to be another nobody sitting in Stockholm, Sweden who did the counting of casualties himself by sourcing his information from an Iraqi writer living in Stockholm, Sweden! There you have your 3 credible sources. Go ahead and shoot it at the public.
Wait, before you leave, you need to make it public attracting, and you need a celebrity. There's plenty of them, here's one: 
https://twitter.com/MiaFarrow/statuses/188063897553608704


I'm sure Mia Farrow is not involved out of her sudden love to the Syrian people, otherwise she would have done something to stop the unilateral sanctions imposed on the Syrian people by the same powers crying for the Syrian people.
There is killing in Syria, there is a crisis there, but the questions everybody should ask are: Who is doing the killing? Who are the victims? How can over 3,000 soldiers be killed and by who? Surely not by some chants of 'peaceful protesters'. Who did the many suicide bombings Al Qaeda style in Aleppo and Damascus? Who benefits from the killings in Syria? Should we accept that NATO destroys Syria like they did in Libya, devastate the country, kill tens of thousands of Syrians like they killed over 120,000 Libyans (Libya's population is 9.6 million or was living on over 1.75 million square kilometres comparing with 24 million Syrians living on 185,000 sq. kms) to come one year later and say: "No Evidence That Gaddafi Fired On His Own People"
Or like the Iraqi case still looking for those Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction that caused the deaths of over a 1 million Iraqi, displacement of 4 million internally and across the borders, and sending the country to pre-Stone age.
As I say always: They fool you, they keep fooling you and they enjoy fooling you, not because they're smart, it's just because you are 'Foolable'. 
We Warned You

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Iranophobia

'Iranophobia' is becoming more like an epidemic than a symptom by Westerns no thanks to their politicians and their mainstream propaganda media that lost its glare once earned for unbiased and professional reporting.

An article appeared on The Atlantic by Max Fisher on March 29, 2012 titled 'Iran's Female Ninjas File a Lawsuit: Not Every Iranian Is Out to Kill Us' trying to shed a light on the mistrust between Iran and the West.

The author proved to be what he criticizes, he suffers from 'Iranophobia'!

What the author says and how he fell unintentionally or maybe intentionally in the same propaganda line:

- "Iranian women do not have it very easy in life, which is maybe why 3,500 of them decided to learn the martial art of ninjutsu"- the author states that Iranian women do not have it very easy based on the fact that 3,500 of them out of over 35 million of them decided to learn a martial art technique. I'm sure the author has never met a single Iranian woman who most of them are much more comfortable than the majority of their Western counterparts, and I met quite a number of them from different levels of society.

- "PressTV is notoriously unreliable (ironically, their story uses stolen Reuters photos)" - so Iranian PressTV is "notoriously unreliable" because their story "uses stolen Reuters photos" but when 'The Atlantic' steals the same photos they say "His photos (which we also ran)"!

- "so why are its Iranian subjects taking it so seriously that they'd want to open a lawsuit?" then adds "This seems like a bit of an overreaction." - If I got this right: defamation of 'subjects' & accusing them of being terrorists shouldn't be taken seriously because the 'subjects' are Iranians! Let me imagine for a second if it was a Western 'subject', how many millions of $'s would be the lawsuit worth? And because the subjects are Iranians, it's an 'overreaction' to open a lawsuit for being defamed on a major news providing agency that had its story 'ran' in most news & social sharing outlets..

- "Maybe if we in the West could find a way to not be terrified of every back-flipping Iranian, and if Iranians could not assume an anti-Iranian conspiracy behind every Western movement, we might get along a little better." Now this is disturbing in the use of hidden conception: if the writer's intention were good, he'd not individualize "every back-flipping Iranian" as a cause of terrifying Westerns, while generalizing "every Western movement" as "anti-Iranian conspiracy" especially that we all know that every Western 'government' movement towards Iran was always an anti-Iranian conspiracy!! Instead of concluding the article with a good closure, the author played the same brainwashed "Jazeeratized" Iranophobia Western media-fed propaganda again.

Just a side note: we Syrians had also our share of defamation by Western media & especially Reuters during the ongoing riots: not every Syrian is against his country, on the contrary, those carrying the NATO flag in Syria are quite a few magnified by the Western media, and definitely none of Syrians against NATO operation duped The Arab Spring are 'Assad thugs/ loyalists/ Shabeeha/ defenders of killers..' We support our government against NATO because we don't want to end like Iraq or Somalia or Libya or Afghanistan or...
Jazeeratized
We Warned You
Iranian Female Ninja (we 'ran' this photo)
Iranian Female Ninja (we 'ran' this photo)

SiteGround

SiteGround
We Recommend SiteGround for Web Hosting