Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Who is Winning and Who is Losing in Syria?


Syria, the ongoing conflict that NATO member states has started by inflicting strife among societies in sovereign nations using old style techniques and covert operations, in order to justify invading new countries for the goal of exporting devastating worrying and pressing internal economic crises at home, this crisis is now backfiring on those who started it, and benefiting those who are opposing it, how come? Let's read the current situation away from propaganda:

Those who planned the Arab Spring have worked hard in details of every movement to be carried out basing their plans on previous successes in other countries like Yugoslavia and Ukraine and just did a copy paste into selected MENA (Middle East and North Africa) countries in an order that was supposed to take out 7 countries also didn't go as planned because planning on paper is something and how events evolve on the ground is something different. 

What happened now is the order didn't go as planned, some countries came into the spotlight instead of others, therefore there was a huge failure in anticipating what to do at the higher levels of policy making in NATO countries and you all remember how they tried to support Ben Ali in Tunisia then they had to call for his ouster when it went out of hands, then what happened when they tried to the very last minute with Mubarak and then the same thing happen because Egypt was not supposed to be in the first wave, it was supposed to start later, Libya was within the plan and therefore they went in full speed even against UNSC and against all odds, Gaddafi was just a month before an honourable guest by all NATO leaders and a friend in many then out of a sudden he's a dictator and should be killed! Syria was supposed to fall for the 'Arab Spring' but things didn't turn out the way planned, because they didn't read Syria and the Syrian people properly, they just copied and pasted and that's why we are now witnessing exactly what they tried to avoid for a very long time: the demise of the west hegemony on the international arena and the rise of the BRICS (Brasil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) countries on the west's account and here is the list of who is winning now and who is losing based on those who are involved directly now in the Syrian case:

1. Syria: Despite the death of several thousands of civilians, army personnel and security staff, damages to the infrastructure and a squeeze to the economy, Syria gained a lot and here is a count of few gains:
a.  Instead of losing tens of thousands by pulling the legs of the Syrian army to face the armed terrorists in full scale and thus justify a NATO invasion using their puppets in Turkey, the Syrian army and security has chose to handle the insurgency with caution and extra care by surgical operations that leads to taking out the terrorist at the least cost on the civilians side. In Libya over 160,000 feared to have lost their lives due to NATO strikes and ensuing civil war, in Iraq over 1 million Iraqi lost their lives for the same reason.
b. NATO agents have been planted inside Syria and others were recruited over a span of several years, spies sent and terrorists were embedded in remote communities, the current crisis has flushed all of these and hundreds of them are now kept away or liquidated.
c. The current crisis gave president Assad the motive he needs to push on political, economical and social reforms he was implementing with fierce resistance from layers of corrupt officials slowing it for years, now within less than a year the country has a new constitution and a number of long awaited laws including lifting the Emergency Law, cancelling the State Security Court, a new multi-party law and a host of other new laws.
d. Now Syria knows exactly who are its foes and who are its friends on the international arena, and especially those in the region.
e. Sanctions should push the country imposed on to be creative and innovative, therefore the Syrian economy that suffered from a lengthy unjustifiable bundle of sanctions has managed to be self-efficient, and when its economy was opened in a hastily way, this crisis worked as an awakening to depend on self resources instead of imports.
f.  Syria and Turkey has signed a number of mutual treaties that were n favor of Turkey and its economy on the account of the Syrian economy, as Turkish extreme Muslim Brotherhood government under Erdogan went too far in its hostility towards Syria, the latter managed to cancel all such treaties and get back on track of development.

2. Russia: As a rising super economy at the same time the United States economy is facing its worst days along with its western allies, gave Russia a push to be reinstated as a super power, this was practiced twice politically by the double veto at the UNSC with China and economically by speeding its South Stream Gas pipelines while Nabucco the project the west was planning to transfer gas by pipes excluding Russia and in a direct hit to strangle it, now it’s in the past and Russia is strangling its foes.

3. China: As Russia has benefited from proving its heavy weight on the international scene and after decades of silent and sometimes negative policy and became a dynamic player in many regions starting with its experience in Syria after the first double veto at the UNSC with Russia in November 2011 and then the second in February again with Russia putting an end to the hegemony of the single polar and hegemony of the USA on the entire world.

4. Iran: The decades age alliance between Iran and Syria has proven to be the most viable, most trustworthy, most valuable alliance among all alliances in the history of countries’ relations. Instead of isolating Iran after removing Syria then targeting it directly, the failure of the plot in Syria has boosted Iran’s ability to maneuver more freely and take further precautions.

5. Iraq: Was supposed to extend the US occupation of this country, but because the plot didn’t succeed in Syria, and the steadfast position the three countries: Iraq, Iran and Syria the team has managed to lead to a complete US army withdrawal in the shadow of night in a very humiliating way. Iraq is back to its regional positioning instead of being an attachment to the United States.

6. USA: Since it couldn’t extend the occupation of Iraq due to the failure of its plot in Syria, USA started the retreat move and back to its normal size. Its economy will not get the boost it was hoping for by stealing others wealth, and the retreat will not be limited to Iraq, but will cover the entire MENA within a very short period of time.

7. Other NATO members: France and UK in particular after they won the invasion of Libya faced their defeat in Syria, now instead of planning for long staying in Libya and other areas in the region, they’ll be planning to steal as much as possible at the shortest time because when Syria finishes its crisis, the cleansing will be spread and the dominos will flip the other way back. France has proved it’s a helpless country and its economy will fail in a faster and more hurtful manner. USA, France, UK and to a large extent Germany had their military toys get exposed and from super powers which dictates orders to smaller countries to countries begging their victims to protet their troops in Afghanistan and US president begging Iran to return the spy drone the latter managed to control.

8. Qatar: Was having its days in rising as a regional player and a respectful role among Arabs, it was defaced because of its roles and the consequences of having spilling blood in Syria and Libya mainly will be very hard, Qatar should think seriously and very fast who to present as scapegoats to retain its geography or else.

9. Saudi Arabia: Was silent for most of the time but lately had shown that it was also a player side by side with the Qataris. When you push others for democracy you will have to be ahead of them and lead by example, so the democracy infection is hitting Saudi very fast and it’ll be very violent unless they recalculate very fast and change their entire way of living before their public think for a second why they’re pushing for democracy abroad when they lack the basics of it inside the country?!

10. israel: The biggest loser from the entire crisis in Syria, watching the real power of the Syrian Army and the coherence of the integral Syrian governmental establishment based on secular democracy rather than the sectarian false democracy the Zionism that is running the baseless regime of the occupiers in Palestine.

11. Others: The world is witnessing a new world order, not the way the neoconservatives in Washington wanted, but a balanced one where every country will be exercising its powers within its power limits. The Arab countries will wake up to the sad story that the Arab Spring was a fake revolution and this fake revolution has failed miserably leading them from a secular dictatorship to an extremist dictatorship, the developing countries now can stand up in front of conditions proposed by the USA and its sisters in crimes France and UK, toothless Germany and the barking Canada and Australia.

A lot more will come out especially when Syria finishes its crisis and cleanse its land from the NATO agents, these to come are for the good of the world and for the dismay of the criminals, not that they’ll give up, but their venom will be less effective.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Short Video Clip Documents NATO Media Propaganda



Syria
The Real Story


REAL journalism does exist

There are journalists that want to provide the world with teh TRUE accounts.

This video is an example of this.



Webster Tarpley (Author, Historian, Journalist): “There are death squads, there are terrorist commandos that had been brought in by the world’s specialists in death squads and terrorists commandos, that is the CIA and NATO intelligence. Think of what you know about Argentina, think of what you know about Central America. Death squads, right… this is what’s actually happening, and when you get these accounts right from Al Jazeera or any number of other authorities about children being killed or how many people got killed? Ask yourself: who’s doing the killing? And it turned out in a very large numbers of these cases, it’s these snipers.”

Eric Margolis (Author, Journalist): “The situation in Syria remains incredibly murky and complex and opaque as when we last discussed it. - Oh Really? The Western media makes the situation seem so simple: Isn’t the Assad regime simply cracking down and targeting protesters? That is what we are intended to believe.”

Thierry Meyssan (Author, Journalist): “RT’s Sara Firth asks him Q: Can you tell us what are your perceptions of the situation?
A: It begin with some armed groups entering inside the country, and making big troubles, trying to create Islamic emirates on the borders first near Jordan.

He says “On the border near Jordan”

Nizar Nayouf (Syrian Journalist): “Nizar Nayouf confirms the fact that troops are organizing on the Jordan border:
James Corbett (from the corbettreport.com) asks him: as I understand we have a developing new story at the moment, it seems that foreign military forces are amassing on the Jordanian borders near Syria, so what information can you give us about this story?
A: Information I received about foreign (strangers) moving between some villages (Jordanian villages) near the Syrian border… There are many hundreds of troops, they are not Jordanian, not Arabs… They decided to make something like a command center in the village of Al Housha, it is near Al Mafraq, about 5 kilometers or more, Al Mafraq is only 10 Kilometers from the Syrian borders… now we can say that troops who were moving between the Syrian borders are Americans and not from another nationality..”

Webster Tarpley: “In Syria unfortunately we have to do, we are dealing with a betrayal of good neighborly relations by the main four countries Turkey, Jordan, Iraqi Kurdish Entity and also by Lebanon.. We have 4 places where a rebellion has been tried some months ago, and each one is peripheral, they’re all at the edge of Syria, not in the middle, they’re at the edge, and it simply shows you when you look at the map that this is being done from outside the country.”

Eric Margolis interviewed on Antiwar Radio – December 2012: “yes, there are outside forces, they’re armed groups, some of them are Salafist Islamic hardliners, some are just mercenaries, some of them are Lebanese fascists from the Phalange party, coming in from Lebanon being financed and armed by the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia.. in attempt to promote Civil War and Overthrow the Government.”  

This may sound a bit familiar:

Thierry Meyssan compares the West’s actions in Libya to the situation in Syria:
“RT’s Sara Firth Q: You were also on the ground in Libya, in what ways you can do a comparison to the situation happening now in Syria?
A: The way to act for NATO is exactly the same, they do exactly the same way to create the file in the United Nations first the Geneva Council on Human Rights and after in the Security Council, they try to manipulate the Arab League exactly in the same way in the Libyan case, they organize a big story in front of the General Council on Human Rights, they said there are 5,000 people killed by the security forces, of course it’s absolutely wrong; there are a lot of people killed but a very few by the security forces, most of them are killed by this armed groups they put inside the country, and they’re the same armed groups they use in Libya, and now you have some different solution.. there are some 600 people coming from Al Qaeda in Libya who are now in Syria, especially the head of the military government of Tripoli, Libya is now in Iskandaron in Turkey to organize all the fight inside Syria, and he leads the Tripoli Brigade which was the people from Al Qaeda and now responsible for the security in Tripoli, they are now all of them inside Syria and the famous Spanish reporter who was first in Libya recognized them here inside.. at the top of this so called Free Syrian Army, but it is not Syrian.”

Webster Tarpley: “They eventually began to recycle the killers and terrorists who were active in Libya during the summer, the Al Qaeda and Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood tasks who were there, they’re been recycled back into Syria. We then went on to visit the home of a guy who got killed, they invited us, the local people said: here you have to go and talk to this family, and this guy was a taxi driver and we get into the ethnic stuff, he was an Alawite taxi driver, he was kidnapped and murdered by a group of these terrorists, so we got to visit his family, and the family were Assad supporters, they had pictures of Hafez Assad and the current president in their homes.. I would just say the difference between the Latin American death squads and the Syrian death squads as far as I can see is the following: the Latin American death squads was very carefully targeted, was kidnapping and murder and if you were a communist or if you were a trade unionist then you were a fine target, but in the case of Syria it’s just killing, they told us men, women and children, you could be a Sunni, you could be a Shia, you could be an Alawite, you could be a Christian, you could be a Druze, you could be a Kurd, this didn’t matter, so it’s not the targeted you know knock on the doors in the dead of night and then you’re kidnapped and you disappear, it’s more you’re walking along the street at 3 o’clock in the afternoon and you get killed by a sniper. So this I think is the reality of Homs.”

“You arrive at a situation, you arrive at a scene where a half an hour ago somebody got shot, and 30 minutes later people are crossing very normally the street, me crossing the street, I’ve been feeling basically, literally I’ve been feeling that somebody is aiming, the sniper is aiming at me and it’s up to him if he’s going to pull the trigger or not.

I came to this junction, and I realized that somebody wanted to cross the street with a huge bag of cigarettes, so I could hear the snipers shooting and he was unable to cross the street and the bag of cigarettes was in the middle of the street, so it was again one of this very impressive scenes where people have been very happily and almost like a sports challenge to get the cigarettes bag out from the snipers range, and they’ve been happy when they could.”

“We need to cross the street to buy bread and other food, but the snipers have surrounded this area, it’s a huge danger”

“And they started to throw the bread because they were not able to cross, so everything they needed on the other side they throw it over the streets”

Webster Tarpley: It’s blind terrorism, random killing, a kind of uncontrollable massacre of people, and let me just be specific about what I mean by this: If you read these crazy Western media, they will tell you that Homs is the great center of this rebellion here, the civil war in Syria.. Well, when we got here, with the delegation I was with, we went right to Homs, within 24 hours of the coming we went to Homs, and not only did we go to Homs, we went to Zahra, we went to the neighborhood that supposedly thee center of all agitation, and when you get there what you see is first of all empty streets and then eventually we saw 500 people in a public square and they were agitating somehow, they were having a demonstration of some kind, we were a little bit frightened because we thought these were the people armed and .. so we get down on to the street, we leave our bus, and go on to the street, and here are these people, the number one issue for them it’s not what you think, it’s ‘Mazoot’, they’re concerned about fuel oil, and they’re concerned about the fact that it’s getting cold and the winter is here and they need to heat their homes, and there’s not enough fuel oil and they have criticisms of the governor of the province whom we also met, who seems like a good guy to me, but they say that he doesn’t do enough to get the ‘Mazoot’, now, as soon as you are talking about ‘Mazoot’, there are two things: one is there’s already economic sanctions by NATO, there’s economic warfare that influences the availability..

Economic sanctions forced upon Syria by NATO and The Arab League has devastated the population. Yet most Syrians continue to have faith in their leader.”

Thierry Meyssan: “At the beginning of the sanctions it destroyed different parts of the economy, of course all the tourism is totally destroyed, but during the winter you have no more fuel, there’s also problems with different imported goods, but I think this is now changing because there’re new agreements between Syria, Iran and China for that, they try now to impose Arabic sanctions and it could really be a disaster for this country but they discovered very quickly that it will be also a disaster for the other Arab countries around, so they have to stop these sanction. So now Syria is able to resist for a very long time this pressure from NATO.”

Webster Tarpley: “The other thing is I’ve been told that various of these terrorists, the death squads, they specifically target the trucks that carry the fuel oil ‘Mazoot’, they hijack the trucks and try to take them to Turkey where they can sell at a better price, and Lebanon, so we got to see these people demonstrating, so the question is: what is the political coloration, they’re pro Assad..”

A huge pro-Assad rally in Damascus shown.

Eric Margolis: “I would guess at least half or maybe more in Syria who support the government, like Syrian Christians, Syrian Kurds, minority groups, Armenians.. and the business community, and people in the big cities who want stability and calm.”

Webster Tarpley: “The interesting thing was their criticism of Assad was not that he was a tyrant or that he did too much, but that he was too soft, he was too concerned about international public opinion, he was too concerned about having people abroad think that he was cracking down, these people were basically begging for a crackdown, they said: where is the Syrian Army? Indeed, when you drive in, you think wow, if it was a hot neighborhood there’ll be a tank at every corner, there’ll be troops in the streets, no, there was not this stuff.”

Thierry Meyssan: “Since for the last 10 years in the Middle East, the imperialistic system is pushing the division between the communities, to reshape the great Middle East diving the people in different sects.”

Webster Tarpley: “It doesn’t matter who you are? Whether you’re a man, woman, a child, you can be a Baathist, a communist, that doesn’t matter, they’ll kill you anyway. You can be Christian any kind, Greek Orthodox, whatever, Assyrian, you can be Sunni, Druze, Kurds, you can be anything, and they’ll kill you. So it’s an equal opportunity killer.

That is, I think, an extremely dramatic proof that the story, I just saw one of the presenters on the BBC say: and of course Homs is the center of this rebellion, I’ve been there, I’ve been with people all around me, they couldn’t wait to tell their stories, then you ask them: what should happen? What is the answer to this? What are you demanding? And they’ll say: we want the Syrian Army to come in large numbers, we want more soldiers here, what should they do? They want the soldiers to climb on the roofs of the houses and stay there and patrol and make sure that the snipers can’t come and start killing people.”

Eric Margolis: “Since the days of the Bush Administration, the US Congress has been funding subversion in Syria to overthrow the government, and now that movement has accelerated because before there was cautions, who would take over? If the Muslim Brotherhood is going to take over if we overthrow the government, now we don’t care.. it’s just a way to get the Iranians.. let’s just Bomb, Bomb, Bomb those Iranians.”

Scott Horton (Host of Antiwar Radio): “Well, as you say all of this is just done with Iran in mind because they just figured if they can take the Assad regime to fall and Syria to come apart that it’ll provoke enough of a reaction out of the Iranians and they can finally maneuver them to fire the first shot supposedly and the next war.”

Eric Margolis: “There’s that and there’s Iran will be seriously weakened by the loss of Syria, its most important ally, Hizbollah will be cut off, the israelis will be delighted, the Palestinians will be left without Syrian supporters, Syrian base, so it will be seen as a big victory by Washington.”

What exactly is happening?

Webster Tarpley: “The basic situation is that there’s a hysterical demagogic public relations campaign by NATO intelligence, the CIA, MOSSAD, MI6, DGSE  and other NATO forces against Syria, and this is a destabilization, the goal is to overthrow the government and to smash the existing political arrangements, to smash the STATE.”

How are we being fooled?

“And their thesis is that there’s a civil war in Syria, that there’s a mass political movement of most of the population against president Assad and against the Baath party that the Syrian Army under the orders of the Baath party and Assad have responded to this by killing 3,000 or 4,000 people. And the striking thing is that when you get here you see this is a complete fiction. It is a fantastic invention.”

We have reached a critical time in history. Imperialist propaganda is at it’s peak.

Webster Tarpley: “This is not a civil war, there’s no civil war.”

We must be aware and educate ourselves.

Webster Tarpley: “There’s no mass killing of civilians by the army.”

For, we are living in an age where the decisions of very few will affect millions of lives…
For generation.

Webster Tarpley: “A divergent of reality and propaganda.”

“By the skillful and sustained use of propaganda, one can make a people see even heaven as hell or an extremely wretched life as paradise. Adolf Hitler

Webster Tarpley: “It’s really a political analyses that has no roots on this planet, maybe on another planet, but not this one.”

The time is now to stand up.

Webster Tarpley: “The reality that you find is absolutely the opposite in the most striking way I think in recent years anywhere in the world. It’s a complete negation.”

“All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume”. Noam Chomsky

Annotations:


Webster Tarpley - Author, Historian, Journalist
On Guns and Butter | KPFA 94.1 FM Berkeley
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/76242

On Syrian Addounia TV -
http://tarpley.net/media-interviews/?id=SyriaTV-20111121#SyriaTV-20111121
Pro-government rally -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is_DYXolAeM

Thierry Meyssan - Author, Journalist
RT interview -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfbzDZmtSL4

Eric margolis - Author, Journalist
Antiwar.com Radio With Scott Horton -
http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/12/13/eric-margolis-59/

Nazir Nayouf - Syrian Journalist
US Troops Deploying on Jordan-Syria Border - The Corbett Report
http://www.corbettreport.com/breaking-us-troops-deploying-on-jordan-syria-bor...


PROOF of Aljazeera's lies -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GwRqyGe42I&feature=related

Intro and Outro song -
He got game - Public Enemy

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Read the News About Syria From a Different Angle

Some of the news regarding Syria that occurred during the past 24 hours & you didn't read it correctly:

1) Sarkozy, the French president confesses: "we cannot have a revolution 'against the Syrian govt' without the Syrian people".
Who were you supporting then you stupid moron if the people aren't revolting?! & since you don't have the 'people revolting' what were you telling your people all this time? And why are you so aggressive against the Syrian government if its people aren't revolting? Who is really killing people there?

2) James Clapper, US Spy Chief confirmed Al Qaeda is fighting Syrian govt & carrying terrorist attacks against it. So Syria isn't allowed to fight Al Qaeda now since it is a US ally against Syria! Wasn't Al Qaeda created, supported, planted, trained, equipped and financed by the CIA? & who released over 400 ex-Qaeda members from Iraqi jails before the US Army withdrawal from there & dispatch them to Syria?! Who airlifted between 600 & 900 Al Qaeda members from Libya to Turkey's borders with Syria? Who brought hundreds more to Jordan, south of Syria, again from Libya, for 'recreation'?! Who really controls Al Qaeda & who really fights it?!

3) Russians intel revealed a plot while listening to conversations that the FSA, the umbrella which all 'rebels', 'freedom fighters', 'Salafis', 'Ikhwan', 'Al Qaeda' and 'thugs' work under, was intending to use chemical weapons & commit a massacre then blame it on the Syrian army to cause discontent among the Syrian public, use it as a political card & maybe justify a swift military intervention. Then earlier today a NY Times prominent reporter Anthony Shadid embedded with an FSA group 'dies' at the borders inside a military closed zone of an 'asthma attack' as his employer stated & added he was allergic to horses! Aren't the symptoms of an 'asthma attack' very similar to inhaling a poisonous chemical gas?! Just wondering because his body was carried by a cameraman alone and under barbed borders in a very tense high heated border area, unless the cameraman is some kind of a superman!

4) A prominent Sunni Sheikh 'cleric' was assassinated in front of his house in a Damascus suburb with 5 gun shots (hatred) just a week after his Khutba 'Friday sermon' was aired live by State TV asking armed militias to lay down their weapons & join the reform process peacefully. All NATO aligned media labeled him: a 'pro-Assad religious leader' in an ugly way first to hide the fact that he was a Sunni sheikh, then to justify his killing as if he deserved to be killed for his opinion not to carry out terrorist attacks against civilians & infrastructure!!

5) A vetoed UNSC resolution was carried to the UNGA to condemn the Syrian govt for acts of violence against own people, of course beside all the above, we should note that this precedent opens the road to carry about or more than 60 vetoed UNSC resolutions condemning israel for its barbaric acts in Palestine against Palestinians. All vetoes were by the USA alone against the will of the other 14 members of the UNSC & latest was last week!!

Friday, February 10, 2012

To The TIME For Their New Cover Story

You are trying your best to demonize the Syrian govt to justify foreign intervention while terrorists supported by NATO are bragging with their crimes all over the net..

I'm afraid I have to break this sad news for you: in case you succeed in convincing your countries' masses & public opinion by fooling them time and again, from Afghanistan and the fictional story of cavemen who took down USA's twin towers & the 3rd that went down in solidarity bypassing all intel & forces, to the WMD's in Iraq not found till date (9 years & counting) to the Libyan leader (your close friend) decided after 40 years to kill 5,000 of his own civilians so you rushed to slaughter over 120,000 including him... And every time your masses are fooled because they're 'foolable', well I have to break the bad news for you: such lies don't find believers amongst our people and every time you come up with a new lie you make the people in the MENA hate you more and find salvation in their own leaders..

Now that you've targeted Syria with your stupid lies, this is where it get back at you, in the comparison of societies Syria is at least 7,000 years ahead of you in civilization and exactly how Syrians taught you how to write when they invented the alphabet 7,000 years ago, they'll teach you this time a very nasty lesson in intelligence, manners and punch you right straight in your bulldog face to reshape it and allow some humanity to enter to your brains through the holes we'll create.

Link to the TIME's tweet & sick attempt: https://twitter.com/time/status/168001656519274496

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

A 'Dictator' Who Has 'Advisers'!


Behold, a revelation has been uncovered: Assad has advisers.

For years we were fed by all western media (NATO and Friends) that the Syrian 'Regime' first is a regime and not a government and second it's a dictatorship, a one man show, a person who takes decisions by self and enforces its application on all state officials thus people.

Didn't seem to be the case especially after the current events unveiled the thick veil so many in the West cover their eyes with when looking at the MENA region. Now there's an urge to look back at those using such terminology to see whether they themselves understand the terms they use?

A Dictator: Is generally known to be a leader of a country who 'dictates' his vision and orders on his subordinates.
A Regime: The term itself is widely being used to demonize a government that is not obliging to orders by the USA or whoever supports the mainstream media in order to justify attacking it.

Bashar Al Assad is nothing near a dictator, how? Let's see..

A hacker claims to have breached the Syrian 'presidential' email system, and as many of you don't know, the presidential establishment in Syria is combined of a minister, advisers, office (bureau) manager, secretariat divisions as well as the guards. That seems to be very organized, but not our story here, this hacker who breached the email system of the Syrian presidential palace and put his hands on secret email correspondences that took place between the president office different staff came to a conclusion that president Assad before his interview with ABC Walters in Damascus quote "About 10 days before the interview, Sheherazad Jaafari - a press attache at the Syrian mission to the United Nations - sent a long email to former Al Jazeera journalist Luna Chebel, who now works in Assad's bureau. She also sent the email to an aide of Shaaban's. Jaafari, who was involved in arranging the interview with Walters, also happens to be the daughter of the Syrian ambassador to the UN, Dr. Bashar Jaafari."

quote: "Jaafari Jr. wrote: "The major points and dimensions that have been mentioned a lot in the American media are: The idea of violence has been one of the major subjects brought up in every article. They use the phrases 'The Syrian government is killing its own people,' 'Tanks have been used in many cities,' 'Airplanes have been used to suppress the peaceful demonstrations,' and 'Security forces are criminals and bloody.'""

And goes on.. What the west media is trying to show is the president of Syria is weak, what they fail to show is the fact that president Assad did his interview without referring to notes, fluently in English, straightforwardly answering questions, some of which were improvised! Furthermore, what we can get out of this claimed 'email leak':

  • Syrian government is nothing as we were meant to understand: it consists of coherent establishments and apparatuses all constitutional and all are like most western 'democracies' if not exceeding many of them.
  • Advisers do their job in advising without fear of repression, send notes openely and straightforwardly.
  • So many are involved in policy making in Syria including: Officials, Advisors, Media specialists, University professors, Surveyors, and Allies.
  • Assad advisers and government officials are doing one heck of a job assisting him in maintaining the sovereignty of the country in the face of a vicious media and PR campaign waged against Syria for over about 11 months now and more before (2000, 2003, 2005, 2006..), and in face of NATO state members and its allies, keeping in mind the size of Syria and its limited resources vs its foes. On the other hand, the advisers of world leading countries such as the USA, have driven their countries in crazy adventures abroad criminalizing their country in killing millions of innocent civilians under the guise of 'protecting them' and 'spreading democracy', and collapsing the country's economy and the welfare of own people!.

  • Brilliance is not an exception in Syrians, it runs in the blood of Syrians. Jaafari and his 'daughter' example.
  • 3 ladies involved in one hacking breach (which by itself is illegal and immoral) which means the Assad is more modernized than most leaders out there and appreciates women role and don't use them for media polishing, like so many others do. Not to mention other roles women take in Syria even in the current government they lead ministries like the minister of tourism (Lamya Assi) and ministry's departments of countless examples.
  • All correspondences have a high level language of respect and politeness, they're short and direct to the points and can only come out of educated, civilized and diplomatic officials. Unlike the Syrian opposition figures abroad embedded by NATO countries and imposed on Syrians as future leaders!
  • Assad during the interview with Walters, as well as all other interviews never had a paper and was answering questions directly even using terms referred to by advisors.
  • The Assad-opponent camp on the other side are either very silly, stupid or thinking the public are silly or stupid and can be manipulated like before, especially when it comes to what they feed mainstream media and how they control it and notably in the USA, UK, France and some Arab 'Gulfies'


Now compare what we learned about Syria and its ruling system with what is there in the USA for example, don't compare it with the UK or should we call it UQ since they didn't have a K for a decades and a Q was there before I was even born, in addition to having a monarchy in the first place whether it has any role in ruling or just a parasite on the account of UQ (UK) tax payers.

A smarter than usual opponent would hint to how Assad came to office as so many tend to do, but if this smarter than usual opponent was at least smarter than ordinary, then would find that Bashar Al Assad wasn't elected as the president of Syria back in 2000, rather he was selected to be a president of Syria by a ruling apparatus that not only got the consent of Syrian people and the Syrian People's Assembly (Parliament) and acceptance by the Army and Security, it also got the consent of worldwide leaders; and we shouldn't miss a very important point that there was no contender to him then, after his first term and even till now after almost 11 months of rioting not a single person came out and said he can be par with president Assad in leadership, politics understanding or handling a complicated country like Syria. Keeping in mind that by constitution a president in Syria term is 7 years and 2 consequtive presidencies are 14 years which in the case of president Assad we should witness a presidential campaign in the year 2014, as what the constitution of Syria says.


So, what kind of a 'dictator' who has advisers supporting him in his job, a government that is intact over 11 months of riots and amidst a huge manipulation of facts by NATO and allies mainstream media, his country's army is intact and remarkably very loyal, his ambassadors worldwide never saw a single defection not even at a 3rd secretary level despite huge pressures, and over all of that enjoys the support of the vast majority of his people?




or in another square:


Or we should believe those analyst in the Pentagon who lied at us in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and almost everywhere and when before and not believe the above millions?

Syria's First Lady in a 'Rare' Public Statement, How Rare?


Huffington Post posted an article titled: Asma Assad, Wife Of Bashar Assad, Speaks Out, as if she didn't speak before and then clearly indicates that this is a 'Rare Public Statement', we will see how rare and why NATO mass media is twisting facts in a comment we posted to the same article online and we quote here:

No clue from where you get your news, but I think the Syrian first lady appeared in public during the past 11 months in Syria much more than the US first lady since her husband took office in the USA, as a start.. Maybe not a press interview or an email to a newspaper, but how many first ladies do such a thing?

As for the 'poor timing', all timings are poor if you like or rich if you want, depends on your personal opinion which doesn't matter during war times.

Shelling of Homs is being a fact in NATO and allies media like yourselves, but by whom? You directly state that it was by government forces, I'd very much would like to see your evidence and how you reached to that conclusion when there's as all your media say: Defection in the Syrian Army, so it means that defected soldiers wearing government uniforms using artillery and tanks they took with them when defecting! so it's more likely that they might be those shelling the city and since you can't prove it I wonder how you state it as a fact?! 

War propaganda is a very sophisticated psychological science and especially when you are targeting people of the oldest civilization who taught the world how to write the alphabet, I was expecting much more hard work by you when warmongering so you don't expose yourselves so obviously, look again at the article above and look right beneath it to the picture of the 1st lady appearing in public and listening to her husband's speech in public less than 1 month before this date! 

Your strategy might still work with masses who believed that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction WMDs back in 2003 to justify the invasion and destruction of Iraq and slaughtering over a million Iraqi in order to spread 'democracy' there, the same 'democracy' your OWS 'Occupy Wall Street' movement much needs; or the fantasy of 11 cavemen planning in a Tora Bora cave how to take down two major towers in thousands of miles away avoiding all defence technology the world's number one superpower has and succeeding in taking the two towers down! Not only that, a third tower decides to go down in solidarity with its mates! just to again justify the invasion, destruction of Afghanistan and slaughtering of thousands of Afghani civilians in order to spread 'democracy' in their tribal country; or the undoubted mass media information that Gaddafi, the former ruler of Libya was 'planning' to kill 5,000 civilians in Benghazi so you decided to save them from Gaddafi so you can get to kill them along with over a 125,000 more to justify the invasion and destruction of Libya and get your hands on its vast reserves of oil and gas. Not to mention Somalia and the famine there caused because of the USA siege on the country and inciting conflicts between warlords there..

Yet, there you go again, but wait.. Why this time it's different? Why until now NATO hasn't moved in directly like it did elsewhere? Didn't all your media resemble Syria to Libya continuously? And now without any prior notice your media discovers Syria is not like Libya? If they tell you Syria is not rich with oil and gas like Libya, well that might be true, but there's countries who volunteered to cover the cost, so why didn't NATO interfere in Syria? There's only one reason: the potential danger on israel, and israel is what moves US politicians who mentions it continuously with every speech especially during election times. There's an imminent danger on israel should Syria be directly attacked by NATO, Syria's army is still intact, it even carried out huge drills a couple of months ago, it has missiles that one of them was tested and launched from a Syrian location and landed in Iranian desert with the Iranian cooperation hitting its presumed target with a 100% accuracy which US 'smart bombs' doesn't have. So why messing with Syria directly? Let's tell the public opinion that the president there is 'killing his own people', 'shelling peaceful protesters' by tanks, and use this new 'lie' to justify 'supporting the aspiration of Syrians by all means' to 'topple their own regime' without having to deal with a regional war.

"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me"; how about keep fooling me? Isn't it because you are so 'foolable'?!

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

BBC Promotes A Terrorist to a Victim

I'm not going to discuss biased media especially NATO aligned warmongering mouthpieces, I'll just put a small example and leave the readers to decide.

BBC has built credibility over decades of hard work by its earlier journalists and anchors, but when the battle is about Syria the credibility is worth risking for the BBC, even if it was earned with blood, sweat and lots sums of monies. 

In this example the BBC presents a young guy, a holder of UK passport from Syrian origin, it adopts his story without any reasoning because he accuses the Syrian government security of shooting him while he was standing by during a 'peaceful protests' against the president of Syria, Dr. Bashar Al Assad.

On September 7, 2011 the BBC News posted an article titled UK Citizen Describes Being Shot in Syria, and here is what BBC wrote and I quote exactly the description:

"Danny Abdul Dayem who is a British citizen of Syrian descent was shot in Homs 10 days ago.

He and his family fled Syria arriving in the UK last night.

Forces loyal to the Syrian dictator, Bashr al Asad are said to have killed 14 civilians on Wednesday.

As ever, the details are very hard to come by, since foreign observers are banned from the country.

The attack came in Homs, which is Syria's third city and has been under attack for days." end quote.

You can watch the video clip of the 'victim' shot by "Forces loyal to the Syrian dictator" by clicking the link above under the title of the article or on Youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxzgF6xVF2A (Note the title of the video uploaded by an opposition figure).

That might sound fine, but why would BBC put its credibility at stake for such a weak story? There's no other evidence except what the 'victim' says, and how do we know if what he says is correct or he might not have been shot during a street fight between gangs on a suburb street in UK for instance?

The same person however surprisingly appears in Homs one more time, and in a hot zone talking to CNN and describing what he personally witnessed the 'Khalidiya Massacre' by his narrative which totally contradicted with all logic and proved false-flag as how can victims of an artillery shelling be piled up, naked, handcuffed to the back, slaughtered in a similar pattern and no shrapnel traces? Watch his testimony on Youtube again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y47eqKqxtBE. (Now he's an 'activist' and not a standing by tourist). 

In the same area where this UK citizen of Syrian dissident is staying again in Homs, Syria, 300 rockets have landed in the just same area he is but miraculously all of them has missed him, must have a real link with some sort of a superpower that saves him every time! Watch but don't judge, not yet at least: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16902819 [You might need to scroll a screen downwards for his interview over the net]. 

If the story doesn't convince you what kind of a 'victim' or a 'tourist' or an 'activist' this person is, maybe you need to take a look at him bragging about his role in killing Syrian government soldiers and capturing a Syrian army troop carrier on his Facebook account and posts this photo:


His mother "Helen Dayem" said on Friday 3rd February; "I know u said u had a new car, but this is ridiculous".

I just want to know what exactly is the role of BBC in this? Did they send him back at their responsibility to send them 'citizen journalist' reports from within? Did they know in the beginning who he is and what's his real role in the terrorism and riots happening in Homs among real civilian citizens who are the real victims of such criminals? 

This is just one example of one terrorist dubbed 'freedom fighter', 'citizen journalist', 'peaceful protester'.. whatever, the fact is that people have died, others lived hell times, so many wounded and the majority were from civilians whom didn't riot, because if you want to start a revolution you don't do that against your neighbours or other civilians, if you have grievances of whatsoever kind and you are not a criminal whom attacks police stations or army bases and you do not explode oil and gas pipes and you do not torch court houses and other vicious crimes, you protest and when you are not allowed you sit quiet and in case you want to carry out an armed revolution, you go to where the decision makers are to avoid spilling of innocent civilian bloods in cities where there's no military significance.

Australian ABC Media Watch once uncovered how they fell for a big mistake in reporting a fake video of an event that occurred in Tripoli, Lebanon as happening in Syria [watch here], but they were brave to apologize and smart to learn, will BBC be as brave and smart? 

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Who is Helping Assad?


The question that the public are fed with carefully selected answers to give an impression that the Syrian president Bashar Al Assad is isolated and only is supported by a country or two which their leaders share something not appreciated by the public with Assad, so Who is Helping Assad?


In a recent survey conducted by 'YouGov Siraj' commissioned by Al-Jazeera’s Doha Debates, which are funded by the Qatar Foundation (foes conducting a survey for Assad's popularity) they found that president Assad enjoys more than 55% of the Syrian population's support! So the people of Syria in mass majority support their president.


The Syrian army and the Syrian security forces amounting to more than 600,000 troops are obviously united in full behind president Assad. And these are not imported from somewhere else, they are Syrians.


We add a small fact that the major riots over the past 11 months were in remote villages near the borders with neighbouring countries and that the following major cities didn't see a single riot against president Assad: Damascus & Aleppo (over 11 million alone out of 23 million), then add Latakia, Suwaida, Rigga, Hasaka, Tartous and Qunaitra out of the 14 main provincial centres in Syria.


All that inside Syria, and we move to the international support, the NATO and allies try to focus on two parties: Iran and Russia, while using Iran in an ugly 'ethnic and religious' way while keeping Russia as they 'might change their minds' or 'bargain and sell their ally as they did before' and such hysterical methods.


One should draw the following remarks: 
1. Iran is ruled by Shia leaders obviously because Iran is composed of vast majority of Shias elected democratically.
2. Russia is ruled by a political party reached to power through democratic elections, and in case you'd like to doubt how democratic the elections were, keep in mind they're much more democratic than those held in the USA and for an example: in 2004 presidential elections Al Gore won the elections and George W. Bush took the office. In Russia, there are 7 main political parties with 4 of them are represented in the Duma (the Assembly) with seats between 56 and 238 members, while ask yourself: how many political parties are there in the USA? And how many of them are represented in the Congress?!


So Iran and Russia support president Assad and each one speaks a different language, have different religions, history, political establishment and maybe their differences are much more than what's in common between them and they differ totally with Syria.


Now add:
China: A totally different political system, religious and language.
India: The biggest democracy in the world, again different political system, religions and languages.
Brasil: A major democracy in South America with different religion and different language.
South Africa: A major democracy in Africa with different religion and different language.
ALBA group of countries: 9 self-efficient South and Central America states.
Some of the heavyweight Arab countries like: Algeria, Iraq, Sudan and Mauritania.




All these countries, successful, wealthy, self-efficient with no major public or international debt, combining more than half of the world's population, support president Assad against the failing economies of the NATO group and their failing democracies allies. So, ask again: Who is supporting Assad?


Donate

Donate
Donate to Help Us Continue